Risk, Technology, Health and Everyday Life

  • Qiaolei Jiang


Chapter  1 presented a research overview of this book. This chapter offers an overall review on the relevant literature of this research, a theoretical framework and the research questions are proposed based on the related literature reviewed.


  1. Adam, B., & Van Loon, J. (2000). Introduction: Repositioning risk; the challenge for social theory. In B. Adam, U. Beck, & J. Van Loon (Eds.), The risk society and beyond: Critical issues for social theory (pp. 1–31). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adams, J. (1995). Risk. London: UCL Press.Google Scholar
  3. Alexander, A., Kang, S., & Kim, Y. (2006). Cyberkids: The influence of mediation and motivation on children’s use of and attitudes toward the internet. In L. H. Turner & R. West (Eds.), The family communication sourcebook (pp. 315–334). Thousand Oaks: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. American Psychiatric Association (APA). (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5). Arlington: American Psychiatric Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ball, D. J., & Golob, L. (1999). Diverse conceptions of risk prioritization. Risk Analysis, 2(3), 243–261.Google Scholar
  6. Baym, N. K. (2002). Interpersonal life online. In L. A. Lieverouw & S. Livingstone (Eds.), Handbook of new media: Social shaping and consequences of ICTs (pp. 62–76). London/Thousand Oaks: SAGE.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London/Newbury Park: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  8. Beck, U. (1997). The reinvention of politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  9. Beck, U. (1999). World risk society. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  10. Beck, U. (2000a). The brave new world of work. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  11. Beck, U. (2000b). Risk society revisited: Theory, politics and research programmes. In B. Adam, U. Beck, & J. Van Loon (Eds.), The risk society and beyond: Critical issues for social theory (pp. 211–229). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Beck, U. (2002a). The terrorist threat: World risk society revisited. Theory, Culture and Society, 19(4), 39–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Beck, U. (2002b). Ecological politics in an age of risk. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  14. Beck, U. (2009). World at risk. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  15. Beck, U., & Beck-Gernsheim, E. (1995). The normal chaos of love. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  16. Beck, U., & Beck-Gernsheim, E. (2002). Individualization. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  17. Beck-Gernsheim, E. (2000). Health and responsibility: From social change to technological change and vice versa. In B. Adam, U. Beck, & J. Van Loon (Eds.), The risk society and beyond: Critical issues for social theory (pp. 122–135). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Bickham, D. S., Wright, J. C., & Huston, A. C. (2001). Attention, comprehension, and the educational influences of television. In D. G. Singer & J. L. Singer (Eds.), Handbook of children and the media (pp. 101–119). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  19. Buckingham, D. (2002). The electronic generation? Children and new media. In L. A. Lieverouw & S. Livingstone (Eds.), Handbook of new media: Social shaping and consequences of ICTs (pp. 77–89). London/Thousand Oaks: SAGE.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Burchell, G., Gordon, C., & Miller, P. (Eds.). (1991). The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
  21. Burgess, A. (2002). Comparing national responses to perceived health risks from mobile phone masts. Health Risk and Society, 4, 175–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Byun, S., Ruffini, C., Mills, J. E., Douglas, A. C., Niang, M., Stepchenkova, S., Lee, S. K., Loutfi, J., Lee, J., Atallah, M., & Blanton, M. (2009). Internet addiction: Metasynthesis of 1996–2006 quantitative research. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 12(2), 203–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Castel, B. (1991). From dangerousness to risk. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, & P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality (pp. 281–298). London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
  24. Chou, C., & Hsiao, M. C. (2000). Internet addiction, usage, gratification and pleasure experience: The Taiwan college students’ case. Computers & Education, 35, 65–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. CNNIC. (2018, March 5). The 41st statistical survey report on the internet development in China (in Chinese). Retrieved May 3, 2018, from China Internet Network Information Center website:
  26. Conrad, P., & Schneider, J. W. (1992). Deviance and medicalization: From badness to sickness. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Culpitt, I. (1999). Social policy and risk. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. CYIA. (2010). Research report on internet addiction among Chinese adolescents: 2009 (in Chinese). Retrieved April 25, 2010, from China Youth Internet Association website:
  29. Dean, M. (1999). Governmentality: Power and rule in modern society. New York: Sage.Google Scholar
  30. Denney, D. (2005). Risk and society. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  31. Douglas, M. (1978). Implicit meanings: Essays in anthropology. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  32. Douglas, M. (1986). Risk acceptability according to the social sciences. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  33. Douglas, M. (1992). Risk and blame: Essays in cultural theory. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Douglas, M., & Wildavsky, A. (1982). Risk and culture: An essay in the selection and interpretation of technological and environmental dangers. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  35. Durkheim, E. (2001). The elementary forms of the religious life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Durkheim, E., & Mauss, M. (1963). Primitive classification. London: Cohen and West.Google Scholar
  37. Flynn, R. (2006). Health and risk. In G. Mythen & S. Walklate (Eds.), Beyond the risk society: Critical reflections on risk and human security (pp. 77–95). Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Flynn, J., Slovic, P., & Kunreuther, H. (2001). Risk, media and stigma: Understanding public challenges to modern science and technology. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  39. Foucault, M. (1982). The subject and power. In H. Drefus & P. Rabinow (Eds.), Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics (pp. 208–226). Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Foucault, M. (1991). Governmentality. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, & P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality (pp. 87–104). London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
  41. Gabe, B. (2004). Ulrich Beck: A critical introduction to the risk society. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  42. Giddens, A. (1990). The consequences of modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  43. Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  44. Giese, K. (2003). Internet growth and the digital divide: Implication for spatial development. In E. R. Hughes & G. Wacker (Eds.), China and the internet: Politics of the digital leap forward (pp. 30–58). New York: RoutlegedCurzon.Google Scholar
  45. Goldberg, I. (1995, March 16). Internet-addiction-support-group for those with acute or chronic internet addiction disorder. Retrieved May 3, 2009, from Heidelberg University website:
  46. Griffiths, M. D. (1996). Gambling on the internet: A brief note. Journal of Gambling Studies, 12, 471–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Griffiths, M. D. (1998). Internet addiction: Does it really exist? In J. Gackenbach (Ed.), Psychology and the internet (pp. 61–75). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  48. Griffiths, M. (2000). Does internet and computer “addiction” exist? Some case study evidence. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 3(2), 211–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Grohol, J. M. (2007). Video games no addiction for now. Retrieved May 3, 2009, from Psychcentral website:
  50. Gyllensten, A. L., Ekdahl, C., & Hansson, L. (1999). Validity of the body awareness scale-health (BAS-H). Scandinavian Journal of Caring Science, 13, 217–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Heyman, B. (1998). Introduction. In B. Heyman (Ed.), Risk, health and health care (pp. 1–23). London: Arnold.Google Scholar
  52. Heyman, B. (2004). Risk and mental health. Health Risk & Society, 6(4), 297–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Heyman, B., & Henriksen, M. (1998). Probability and health risks. In B. Heyman (Ed.), Risk, health and health care (pp. 27–64). London: Arnold.Google Scholar
  54. Holden, C. (2010). Behavioral addictions debut in proposed DSM-V. Science, 327(5968), 935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Hood, C., James, B. O., Peters, G., & Scott, C. (Eds.). (2004). Controlling modern government: Variety, commonality and change. Cheltenham: Elgar.Google Scholar
  56. Hughes, E. R., & Wacker, G. (2003). China and the internet: Politics of the digital leap forward. New York: RoutlegedCurzon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Jaeger, C. C., Renn, O., Rosa, E. A., & Webler, T. W. (2001). Risk, uncertainty and rational action. London: Earsthscan.Google Scholar
  58. Jiang, Q. (2014). Internet addiction. In T. L. Thompson (Ed.), Encyclopedia of health communication (pp. 741–743). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  59. Jiang, Q., & Leung, L. (2012). Lifestyles, gratifications-sought, and narrative appeal: American and Korean TV drama viewing among internet users in urban China. The International Communication Gazette, 74(2), 159–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Jiang, Q., & Leung, L. (2015). Internet addiction. In A. Esarey & R. Kluver (Eds.), The internet in China: Cultural, political, and social dimensions (1980s–2000s) (pp. 230–237). Great Barrington: Berkshire Publishing Group.Google Scholar
  61. Joinson, A. N. (2003). Understanding the psychology of internet behaviour: Virtual worlds, real lives. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  62. Jordan, A. B. (2001). Public policy and private practice. In D. G. Singer & J. L. Singer (Eds.), Handbook of children and the media (pp. 651–662). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  63. Jung, J., Qiu, J. L., & Kim, Y. (2001). Internet connectedness and inequality: Beyond the “Divide”. Communication Research, 28(4), 507–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Kemshall, H. (2002). Risk, social policy and welfare. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  65. Kim, K., Ryu, E., Chon, M., Yeun, E., Choi, S., Seo, J., & Nam, B. (2006). Internet addiction in Korean adolescents and its relation to depression and suicidal ideation: A questionnaire survey. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 43, 185–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Komplett. (2010). Internet addict teen ‘beaten to death’ in China. Available at:
  67. Kraut, R., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukopadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Internet paradox: A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? American Psychologist, 53(9), 1017–1031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Kunkel, D., & Wilcox, B. (2001). Children and media policy. In D. G. Singer & J. L. Singer (Eds.), Handbook of children and the media (pp. 589–604). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  69. Lash, S. (2000). Risk culture. In B. Adam, U. Beck, & J. Van Loon (Eds.), The risk society and beyond: Critical issues for social theory (pp. 47–62). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Le Poire, B. A. (2006). Family communication: Nurturing and control in a changing world. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  71. Lee, S., & Chae, Y. (2007). Children’s internet use in a family context: Influence on family relationships and parental mediation. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 10(5), 640–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Lemon, J. (2002). Can we call behaviors addictive? Clinical Psychologist, 6, 44–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Lemyre, L., Lee, J. E. C., Mercier, P., Bouchard, L., & Krewski, D. (2006). The structure of Canadians’ health risk perceptions: Environmental, therapeutic and social health risks. Health Risk & Society, 8(2), 185–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Lenhart, A., Rainie, L., Lewis, O. (2001). Teenage life online: The rise of the instant-message generation and the internet’s impact on friendships and family relationships. Report of the Pew Internet & American Life Project, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  75. Leung, L. (2004). Net-generation attributes and seductive properties of the internet as predictors of online activities and internet addiction. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 7(3), 333–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Leung, L. (2008). Leisure boredom, sensation seeking, self-esteem, and addiction: Symptoms and patterns of cell phone use. In E. A. Konijn, S. Utz, M. Tanis, & S. B. Barnes (Eds.), Mediated interpersonal communication (pp. 359–381). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  77. Lievrouw, L. A., & Livingstone, S. (2006). Handbook of new media: Social shaping and social consequences of ICTs. London/Thousand Oaks: SAGE.Google Scholar
  78. Lin, S. S. J., & Tsai, C. C. (2002). Sensation seeking and internet dependence of Taiwanese high school adolescents. Computers in Human Behavior, 18, 411–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Livingstone, S. (2002). Young people and new media: Childhood and the changing media environment. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
  80. Livingstone, S. (2009). Children and the internet: Great expectations, challenging realities. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  81. Livingstone, S., & Drotner, K. (2008). International handbook of children, media and culture. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
  82. Livingstone, S., & Haddon, L. (2009). Kids online: Opportunities and risks for children. Bristol: Policy.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Lochman, J. E., & Van den Steenhoven, A. (2006). Family-based approaches to substance abuse prevention. Journal of Primary Prevention, 23, 49–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Loges, W. E., & Jung, J. (2001). Exploring the digital divide: Internet connectedness and age. Communication Research, 28(4), 536–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Lubeck, S., & Garret, P. (1990). The social construction of the “at-risk” child. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 11(3), 327–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Lupton, D. (1999). Risk. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  87. Macartney, J. (2008, November 11). Internet addiction made an official disorder in China. Retrieved May 3, 2009, from The Times Online website:
  88. Miller, G., & Holden, C. (2010). Proposed revisions to psychiatry’s canon unveiled. Science, 327(5967), 770–771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China (NHC). (2016). Key information related children within the 2015 version of Chinese public health literacy. Retrieved November 1, 2018, from NHC website:
  90. National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China (NHC). (2018). News Press Conference Record of National Health Commission on 25 September 2018. Retrieved November 1, 2018, from NHC website:
  91. Noller, P. (1995). Parent-adolescent relationships. In M. A. Fitzpatrick & A. L. Vangelisti (Eds.), Explaining family interactions (pp. 77–111). Thousand Oaks: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. O’Malley, P. (2004). Risk, uncertainty and government. London: Glasshouse Press.Google Scholar
  93. Orford, J. (2001). Excessive appetites: A psychological view of addictions. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  94. Paik, H. (2001). The history of children’s use of electronic media. In D. G. Singer & J. L. Singer (Eds.), Handbook of children and the media (pp. 7–27). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  95. Parton, N. (1998). Risk, advanced liberalism and child welfare: The need to rediscover uncertainty and ambiguity. British Journal of Social Work, 28(1), 5–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Peterson, A., & Wilkinson, I. (2008). Health, risk and vulnerability. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  97. Poli, R. (2017). Internet addiction update: Diagnostic criteria, assessment and prevalence. Neuropsychiatry, 7(1), 4–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Rasquier, D. (2001). Media at home: Domestic interactions and regulation. In S. Livingstone & M. Bovill (Eds.), Children and their changing media environment: A European comparative study (pp. 161–177). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  99. Rose, N. (1999). Powers of freedom: Reframing political thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Royal Society. (1992). Risk: Analysis, perception and management. London: Royal Society.Google Scholar
  101. Scheff, T. J. (1984). Being mentally ill: A sociological theory. New York: Aldine.Google Scholar
  102. Schwarz, S., & Thompson, M. (1990). Divided we stand: Rethinking politics, technology and social choice. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
  103. Scott, A. (2000). Risk society or angst society? Two views of risk, consciousness and community. In B. Adam, U. Beck, & J. Van Loon (Eds.), The risk society and beyond: Critical issues for social theory (pp. 33–46). London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  104. Segrin, C., & Flora, J. (2005). Family communication. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  105. Shaffer, H. J. (1996). Understanding the means and objects of addiction: Technology, the internet and gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 12, 461–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Shek, D. T. L., Tang, V. M. Y., & Lo, C. Y. (2008). Internet addiction in Chinese adolescents in Hong Kong: Assessment, profiles, and psychosocial correlates. The Scientific World Journal, 8, 776–787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Silva, E. B. (2010). Technology, culture, family: Influences on home life. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Skolbekken, J. (1995). The risk epidemic in medical journals. Social Science and Medicine, 40, 291–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Slater, D. (2002). Social relationship and identity online and offline. In L. A. Lieverouw & S. Livingstone (Eds.), Handbook of new media: Social shaping and consequences of ICTs (pp. 533–546). London/Thousand Oaks: SAGE.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Stein, L., & Sinha, N. (2002). New global media and communication policy: The role of the State in the twenty-first century. In L. A. Lieverouw & S. Livingstone (Eds.), Handbook of new media: Social shaping and consequences of ICTs (pp. 410–431). London/Thousand Oaks: SAGE.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Subrahmanyam, K., Kraut, R. E., Greenfield, P. M., & Gross, E. F. (2001b). New forms of electronic media: The impact of interactive games and the internet on cognition, socialization, and behavior. In D. G. Singer & J. L. Singer (Eds.), Handbook of children and the media (pp. 73–99). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  112. Sundar, S. S. (2008). Self as source. In E. A. Konijn, S. Utz, M. Tanis, & S. B. Barnes (Eds.), Mediated interpersonal communication (pp. 58–74). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  113. Suratt, C. G. (2006). The psychology of netaholics. New York: Novinka Books.Google Scholar
  114. Surratt, C. G. (1999). Netaholics? The creation of a pathology. Commack: Nova Science Publishers.Google Scholar
  115. Tao, R. (2007). Internet addiction: Analysis and intervention (in Chinese). Shanghai: Shanghai People’s Press.Google Scholar
  116. Tarpley, T. (2001). Children, the internet, and other new technologies. In D. G. Singer & J. L. Singer (Eds.), Handbook of children and the media (pp. 547–556). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  117. Timotijevic, L., & Barnett, J. (2006). Managing the possible health risks of mobile telecommunications: Public understandings of precautionary action and advice. Health Risk & Society, 8(2), 143–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Tsai, C., & Lin, S. (2001). Analysis of attitudes toward computer networks and internet addiction of Taiwanese adolescents. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 4, 373–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Van den Bulck, J., & Van den Bergh, B. (2000). The influence of perceived parental guidance patterns of children’s media use: Gender differences and media displacement. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 44, 329–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Vandewater, E. A., Park, S. E., Huang, X., & Wartella, E. A. (2005). “No, you can’t watch that”: Parental rules and young children’s media use. American Behavioral Scientist, 48, 608–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Vogler, R. J. M. (1993). The medicalization of eating: Social control in an eating disorders clinic. Greenwich: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  122. Wacker, G. (2003). The internet and censorship in China. In E. R. Hughes & G. Wacker (Eds.), China and the internet: Politics of the digital leap forward (pp. 58–82). New York: RoutlegedCurzon.Google Scholar
  123. Wellman, B., & Haythornthwaite, C. (2002). The internet in everyday life. Malden: Blackwell Pub.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Whang, L., Lee, S., & Chang, G. (2003). Internet over-users’ psychological profiles: A behavior sampling analysis on internet addiction. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 6, 143–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. WHO. (2018, September). Gaming disorder. Retrieved November 1, 2018, from WHO website:
  126. Wilkinson, I. (2010). Risk, vulnerability and everyday life. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  127. Williams, R. (1974). Television: Technology and cultural form. Glasgow: Fontana.Google Scholar
  128. Woodard, E. H., & Gridina, N. (2000). Media in the home 2000: The fifth annual survey of parents and children. Philadelphia: Annenberg Public Policy Center.Google Scholar
  129. Yen, J., Yen, C., Chen, C., Chen, S., & Ko, C. (2007). Family factors of internet addiction and substance use experience in Taiwanese adolescents. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 10(3), 323–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. Yoo, H. J., Cho, S. C., Ha, J., Yune, S. K., Kim, S. J., Hwang, J., Chung, A., Sung, Y. H., & Lyoo, I. K. (2004). Attention deficit hyperactivity symptoms and internet addiction. Psychiatry & Clinical Neurosciences, 58, 487–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. Young, K. S. (1996). Psychology of computer use: XL. Addictive use of the internet: A case that breaks the stereotype. Psychological Reports, 79, 899–902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. Young, K. S. (1997). What makes online usage stimulating: Potential explanations for pathological internet use. Paper presented at the 104th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, Toronto, Canada.Google Scholar
  133. Young, K. S. (1998a). Internet addiction: The emergence of a new clinic disorder. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 1(3), 237–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. Young, K. S. (1998b). Caught in the net: How to recognize the signs of internet addiction and a winning strategy for recovery. New York: J. Wiley.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Qiaolei Jiang
    • 1
  1. 1.Tsinghua UniversityBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations