Advertisement

More About Tolerance Justifications

  • Rivka T. WitenbergEmail author
Chapter
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Psychology book series (BRIEFSPSYCHOL)

Abstract

Another aim of this research was to examine the kind of justifications the older participants use to support their tolerant stance. How tolerance is justified is very rarely examined in the psychological literature. However, as suggested earlier justifications offer an understanding of how tolerance is conceptualised as well as providing insight about ways tolerance can be promoted and protected. How younger students aged between six and seven justified their choices was reviewed in Chap.  4. This chapter deals with the responses of older participants between the ages of 11 and 25 in Australia depending on the specific study in question and nine to 24 in the Israeli study. Based on the research conducted about the kind of justifications used to support tolerance and intolerance, a key set of beliefs that are implicated in tolerance and acceptance have emerged which are more sophisticated than those the young children used. They are fairness (Justice, equity), empathy and reason/logic. In addition, the responses of adults with the average age of 30 years also influenced the overall findings.

References

  1. Applebaum, B. (2001). Raising awareness of dominance: Does recognising dominance mean one has to dismiss the values of the dominant group? Journal of Moral Education, 30(1), 55–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Avery, P. G. (1988). Political tolerance among adolescents. Theory and Research in Social Education, 16, 183–201.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.1988.10505564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baron-Cohen, S. (2011). The Evolution and diagnosis of empathy. The Evolutionary Review, 2(1), 55–57.Google Scholar
  4. Baron-Cohen, S. (2014). Against empathy (Forum). Boston Review, 39(5), 25–25.Google Scholar
  5. Baron-Cohen, S., & Wheelwright, S. (2004). The Empathy quotient: An investigation of adults with Asperger syndrome or high functioning autism, and normal sex differences. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 34, 163–175.  https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JADD.0000022607.19833.00.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Batson, C. D. (2008). Empathy-induced altruistic motivation. Paper presented at the Inaugural Herzliya Symposium on Prosocial Motives, Emotions and Behvior, March 24–27, Herzliya, Israel.Google Scholar
  7. Batson, C. D., Chang, J., Orr, R., & Rowland, J. (2002). Empathy, attitudes, and action: Can feeling for a member of a stigmatized group motivate one to help the group? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(12), 1656–1666.  https://doi.org/10.1177/014616702237647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Breslin, A. (1982). Tolerance and moral reasoning among adolescents in Ireland. Journal of Moral Education, 11(2), 112–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bussey, K., Fitzpatrick, S., & Raman, A. (2015). The role of moral disengagement and self-efficacy in cyberbullying. Journal of School Violence, 14(1), 30–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Butrus, N., & Witenberg, R. T. (2015). Some personality predictors of tolerance to human diversity: The roles of openness, agreeableness, and empathy. Australian Psychologist, 48, 290–298 (Published on line in 2013).  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.17429544.2012.00081.x.
  11. Chung-Voon, S. (2002). Developmental differences in racial tolerance from childhood to early adulthood: An investigation of racial tolerance in 6–7 year old children. Unpublished Honours thesis, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.Google Scholar
  12. Colby, A., & Damon, W. (1995). The development of extraordinary moral commitment. In M. Killen & D. Hart (Eds.), Morality in everyday life: Developmental perspectives (pp. 283–313). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Davis, M. H. (1983a). The effects of dispositional empathy on emotional reactions and helping: A multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality, 51, 167–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Davis, M. H. (1983b). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 113–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dewey, J. (1933). How we think. A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. Chicago Ill D. C. Heath.Google Scholar
  16. Duxbury, N. (2009). Golden rule reasoning, moral judgment, and the law. Notre Dame law Review, 84, 1529–1605.Google Scholar
  17. Eisenberg, N., Carlo, G., Murphy, B., & Van Court, P. (1995). Prosocial development in late adolescence: A longitudinal study. Child Development, 66, 1179–1197.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fiske, A. P. (1991). Structures of social life: The four elementary forms of human relations. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  19. Gallese, V. (2001). The SD manifold hypothesis from mirror neurons to empathy. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 8, 33–50.Google Scholar
  20. Gazzola, V., Aziz-Zadeh, L., & Keysers, C. (2006). Empathy and the somatotopic auditory mirror systems in human. Current Biology, 16, 1824–1829.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gerson, M. W., & Neilson, L. (2014). The importance of identity development, principled moral reasoning, and empathy as predictors of openness to diversity in emerging adults. SAGE Open, 4(4), 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gilligan, C. (1983). In a different voice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Gilligan, C., & Attanucci, J. (1988). Two moral orientations: Gender differences and similarities. Merrill-Palmer quarterly, 34(3), 223–237.  https://doi.org/10.2307/23086381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Goldman, A. I. (2002). Social routes to belief and knowledge (pp. 164–181). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Gu, X., Gao, Z., Wang, X., Liu, X., Knight, R. T., & Hof, P. R.,Fan, J. (2012). Anterior insular cortex is necessary for empathetic pain perception. Brain, 135, 9, 2726–2735.Google Scholar
  26. Haidt, J. (2013). The righteous mind. London, UK: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  27. Hamlin, J., Wynn, K., & Bloom, P. (2007). Social evaluation by preverbal infants. Nature, 450, 557–559.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Helwig, C. C. (1998). Children’s conception of fair government and freedom of speech. Child Development, 69, 518–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hoffman, M. L. (1997). Varieties of empathy-based guilt. In J. Bybee (Ed.), Guilt in children (pp. 91–112). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  30. Hoffman, M. L. (2000). Empathy and moral development: Implications for caring and justice. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hoffman, M. L. (2014). Empathy, justice and social change. In H. Maibom (Ed.), Empathy and morality (pp. 71–96). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hogan, L. (2002). An examination of racial tolerance in 6–7 years old children: The influence of young children’s thinking patterns and underlying beliefs. Unpublished Honour’s Thesis, The University of Melbourne, Australia.Google Scholar
  33. Hume (1738/1968). A treatise of human nature. Cambridge MA: Belknap Press, Harvard University.Google Scholar
  34. Jacoboni, M. (2009). Imitation, empathy and mirror neurons. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 653–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Jaffe, S., & Hyde, J. S. (2000). Gender differences in moral orientation: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 126(5), 703–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Jolliffe, D., & Farrington, D. P. (2006). Examining the relationship between low empathy and bullying. Aggressive Behavior, 32, 540–550.  https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kohlberg, L. (1981). The philosophy of moral development: Essays on moral development (Vol. 1). San Francisco: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  38. Kohlberg, L. (1984). The philosophy of moral development: Essays on moral development (Vol. 2). San Francisco: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  39. Kokkinos, C. M., & Kipritsi, E. (2018). Bullying, moral disengagement and empathy: Exploring the links among early adolescents. Educational Psychology, 8(4), 535–552.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2017.1363376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Korol, L. (2017). Is the association between multicultural personality and ethnic tolerance explained by cross-croup friendship? The Journal of General Psychology, 144(4), 264–282.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00221309.2017.1374118.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Korol, L., Gonçalves, G., & Cabral, M. (2016). The impact of multicultural personality on tolerance of diversity in a sample of Portuguese university students. Revista Psicologia, Teoria e Prática, 18(2), 57–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kuhn, D. (1988). Cognitive development. In M. H. Bornstein & M. E. Lamb (Eds.), Developmental psychology: An advanced textbook (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  43. Kuhn, D. (1991). The skills of argument. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kuhn, D. (2002). What is scientific thinking, and how does it develop? In U. Goswami (Ed.), Blackwell handbook of childhood cognitive development (pp. 371–393). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Marcus, G. E., Sullivan, J. L., Thiess-Morse, E., & Stevens, D. (2005). Affective intelligence and political cognition: The impact on extrinsic anxiety on the formation of political tolerance judgments. Political Psychology, 26(6), 949–963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Marcus, G. E., Sullivan, J. L., Thiess-Morse, E., & Wood, S. (1995). With malice towards some: How people make civil liberties judgments. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Mill, J. S. (1859/1978). On liberty. In E. Rapport (Ed.). Indianapolis, USA: Hackett publishing.Google Scholar
  48. Moll, J., & de Oliveira-Souza, R. (2007). Moral judgments, emotions and the utilitarian brain. Trend in Cognitive Science, 11(8), 319–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Neale, C. (2002). The role of reflective judgments and empathy in reflective racial tolerance among young adults. Unpublished honours thesis. Melbourne, Victoria, Australia: University of Melbourne.Google Scholar
  50. Nesdale, D., De Vries Robbe, M., & van Oudenhoven, J. P. (2012). Intercultural effectiveness, authoritarianism, and ethnic prejudice. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42(5), 1173–1191.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2011.00882.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Piaget, J, (1932/1965). The moral judgement of the child. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  52. Pornari, C. D., & Wood, J. (2010). Peer and cyber aggression in secondary school students: The role of moral disengagement, hostile attribution bias, and outcome expectancies. Aggressive Behavior, 36, 81–94.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20336.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Rawls, J. (2001). Justice and fairness: A restatement. In E. Kelly (Ed.). Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, Harvard University press.Google Scholar
  55. Robson, C., & Witenberg, R. T. (2013). The influence of moral disengagement, morally based self-esteem, age, and gender on traditional bullying and cyberbullying. Journal of School Violence, 12(2), 211–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Roga, C, M. (2006). Understanding the cognitive underpinning of acceptance of others: Mental models of tolerance. Unpublished honours thesis, Australia Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia.Google Scholar
  57. Schmitt, M., Gollwitzer, M., Maes, J., & Arbach, D. (2005). Justice sensitivity. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 21, 202–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content of structure and values: Theoretical advance and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 1–65). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  59. Selman, R., & Byrne, D. (1974). A structural-developmental analysis of levels of role-taking in middle childhood. Child Development, 45, 803–806.Google Scholar
  60. Singer, T. (2006). The neuronal basis and ontogeny of empathy and mind reading; Review of the literature and implication for future research. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 3, 855–863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Skoe, E. A., Eisenberg, N., & Cumberland, A. (2002). The role of reported emotions in real-life and hypothetical moral dilemmas. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(7), 962–973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Thomas, T., & Witenberg, R. T. (2004). Love thy neighbour; racial tolerance among young Australians. Melbourne, Australia: The Australian Multicultural Foundation.Google Scholar
  63. Vogt, W. P. (1997). Tolerance and education: Learning to live with diversity and difference. CA: Thousand Oaks, Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  64. Wagner, J. (1986). Political tolerance and stages of moral development: A conceptual and empirical alternative. Political Behaviour, 8, 45–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Walker, L. J. (1984). Sex differences in the development of moral reasoning: A critical review. Child Development, 55(3), 677–691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Wattles, J. (1996). The golden rule. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  67. Walker, L. J. (2006). Gender and morality. In M. Killen & J. G. Smetana (Eds.), Handbook of moral development (pp. 93–115). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.Google Scholar
  68. Wark, E. A., Eisenberg, N., & Cumberland, A. (2002). The role of reported emotions in real-life and hypothetical moral dilemmas. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(7), 962–973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Wark, G. R., & Krebs, D. L. (2000). The construction of moral dilemmas in everyday life. Journal of Moral Education, 24, 1, 5–21. http://theconversation.com/tolerance-is-more-than-putting-up-with-things-its-a-moral-virtue-31507.
  70. Witenberg, R. T. (2000). Do unto others: Towards understanding racial tolerance and acceptance. Journal of College and Character. [On-Line], 1. Available online at: http://www.collegevalues.org.
  71. Witenberg, R. T. (2002a). Reflective racial tolerance and its development in children, adolescents and young adults: Age related difference and context effects. Journal of Research in Education, 12(1), 67–79.Google Scholar
  72. Witenberg, R. T. (2002b). Profiles of reflective racial tolerance and their relationship with justifications. Paper presented at the 32nd Annual Meeting of the Jean Piaget Society, Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
  73. Witenberg, R. T. (2004). The subordination of racial tolerance to freedom of speech: Some consideration for education. Australian Psychologist, 39(2), 114–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Witenberg, R. T. (2007). The moral dimension of children’s and adolescents’ conceptualization of tolerance to human diversity. Journal of Moral Education, 36, 433–451.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240701688002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Witenberg, R. T., Cinamon, G., & Iram, Y. (2003). Contextual and age related differences about reflective tolerance towards Ethiopians, Russians and Israelis: The case of Israel. Monograph published by The Centre for Education for Human Values and Tolerance: Tel Aviv, Bar Ilan University.Google Scholar
  76. Witenberg, R. T., & McDowall, J. (2001). In favour of tolerance: How young adolescents justify their stance about racial tolerance. Paper presented at The 36th Annual Conference, The Australian Psychological Society, Adelaide, South Australia.Google Scholar
  77. Witenberg, R. T, & Thomas, T. (2006). The conceptualization, development and measurement of racial tolerance. Symposium on prejudice, discrimination and tolerance 19th Biennial Meeting of the International Society for the Study of Behavioural Development (ISSBD)Melbourne, July 2–6, 2006.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Independent ResearcherMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations