Advertisement

Nanofibers from Polyhydroxyalkanoates and Their Applications in Tissue Engineering

  • Sumitra DattaEmail author
  • Gopalakrishnan Menon
Chapter

Abstract

Nanofibers are one-dimensional nanomaterials with a host of research and commercial applications. They possess exceptional physicochemical characteristics with fiber diameter ranging from tens to hundreds of nanometers. They have large surface area-to-volume ratio and can form highly porous interconnecting network. Natural, synthetic, carbon-based, semiconducting, and composite/blend polymers have been used to synthesize them. By virtue of their special properties like lower acidity and bioactivity, non-toxic degradation, biocompatibility, tunable surface modifications, wide ranging mechano-physico-chemical characteristics, and non-carcinogenicity, polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs) have emerged as a potential candidate in the field of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.

Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine combines biological systems with engineering expertise, to restore the healthy functions at cellular levels. Their system development is based on cells, biomolecules, and biomaterials. Fabrication of nanofibrous 2D and 3D scaffolds have revolutionised the field of tissue engineering with the development of skin grafts, vascular grafts, bone implants and corneal tissue replacements. Research on fabrication of scaffolds and biodegradable polymers/blends required for fabrication is on a rise with their ever-increasing applications.

Keywords

Nanofibers Electrospinning Bioprinting Scaffold Fabrication Tissue engineering 

References

  1. Agarwala M, Choudhury B, Yadav RN (2014) Comparative study of antibiofilm activity of copper oxide and iron oxide nanoparticles against multidrug resistant biofilm forming uropathogens. Indian J Microbiol 54:365–368.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12088-014-0462-z CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahiwale SS, Bankar AV, Tagunde S, Kapadnis BP (2017) A bacteriophage mediated gold nanoparticle synthesis and their anti-biofilm activity. Indian J Microbiol 57:188–194.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12088-017-0640-x CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Ali I, Jamil N (2016) Polyhydroxyalkanoates: current applications in the medical field. Front Biol 11:19–27.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11515-016-1389-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Azman AS, Othman I, Fang C-M, Chan K-G, Goh B-H, Lee L-H (2017) Antibacterial, anticancer and neuroprotective activities of rare actinobacteria from mangrove forest soils. Indian J Microbiol 57:177–187.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12088-016-0627-z CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Cao H, Liu T, Chew SY (2009) The application of nanofibrous scaffolds in neural tissue engineering. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 61:1055–1064.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2009.07.009 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Chang HM, Wang ZH, Luo HN, Xu M, Ren XY, Zheng GX, Wu BJ, Zhang XH, Lu XY, Chen F, Jing XH, Wang L (2014) Poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyhexanoate)-based scaffolds for tissue engineering. Braz J Med Biol Res 47:533–539.  https://doi.org/10.1590/1414-431X20143930 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Farokhi M, Mottaghitalab F, Samani S, Shokrgozar MA, Kundu SC, Reis RL, Fatahi Y, Kaplan DL (2018) Silk fibroin/hydroxyapatite composites for bone tissue engineering. Biotechnol Adv 36:68–91.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2017.10.001 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Frenot A, Chronakis IS (2003) Polymer nanofibers assembled by electrospinning. Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci 8:64–75.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-0294(03)00004-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gadgil BST, Killi N, Rathna GVN (2017) Polyhydroxyalkanoates as biomaterials. Med Chem Commun 8:1774–1787.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C7MD00252A CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Grande D, Ramier J, Versace DL, Renard E, Langlois V (2017) Design of functionalized biodegradable PHA-based electrospun scaffolds meant for tissue engineering applications. New Biotechnol 37:129–137.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbt.2016.05.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gui Z, Wang H, Ding T, Zhu W, Zhuang X, Chu W (2014) Azithromycin reduces the production of α-hemolysin and biofilm formation in Staphylococcus aureus. Indian J Microbiol 54:114–117.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12088-013-0438-4 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Haider A, Haider S, Kang IK (2015) A comprehensive review summarizing the effect of electrospinning parameters and potential applications of nanofibers in biomedical and biotechnology. Arab J Chem.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2015.11.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Holzwarth JM, Ma PX (2011) Biomimetic nanofibrous scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 32:9622–9629.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.09.009 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Huang Z-M, Zhang Y-Z, Kotaki M, Ramakrishna S (2003) A review on polymer nanofibers by electrospinning and their applications in nanocomposites. Compos Sci Technol 63:2223–2253.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-3538(03)00178-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ingavle GC, Leach JK (2014) Advancements in electrospinning of polymeric nanofibrous scaffolds for tissue engineering. Tissue Eng Part B Rev 20:277–293.  https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.TEB.2013.0276 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Ishii D, Yingh TH, Yamaoka T, Iwata T (2009) Characterization and biocompatibility of biopolyester nanofibers. Materials 2:1520–1546.  https://doi.org/10.3390/ma2041520 CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Jana S, Tefft BJ, Spoon DB, Simari RD (2014) Scaffolds for tissue engineering of cardiac valves. Acta Biomater 10:2877–2893.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2014.03.014 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Jang J-H, Castano O, Kim H-W (2009) Electrospun materials as potential platforms for bone tissue engineering. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 61:1065–1083.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2009.07.008 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Jeyanthi V, Velusamy P (2016) Anti-methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus compound isolation from halophilic Bacillus amyloliquefaciens MHB1 and determination of its mode of action using electron microscope and flow cytometry analysis. Indian J Microbiol 56:148–157.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12088-016-0566-8 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Kalia VC (2014) Microbes, antimicrobials and resistance: the battle goes on. Indian J Microbiol 54:1–2.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12088-013-0443-7 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Kalia VC (2015) In: Kalia VC (ed) Quorum sensing vs quorum quenching: a battle with no end in sight. Springer, New Delhi.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-1982-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kalia VC, Kumar P (2015) Potential applications of quorum sensing inhibitors in diverse fields. In: Kalia VC (ed) Quorum sensing vs quorum quenching: a battle with no end in sight. Springer, India, pp 359–370.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-1982-8_29 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kalia VC, Purohit HJ (2011) Quenching the quorum sensing system: potential antibacterial drug targets. Crit Rev Microbiol 37:121–140.  https://doi.org/10.3109/1040841X.2010.532479 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Kalia VC, Prakash J, Koul S, Ray S (2017) Simple and rapid method for detecting biofilm forming bacteria. Indian J Microbiol 57:109–111.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12088-016-0616-2 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Kenry, Lim CT (2017) Nanofiber technology: current status and emerging developments. Prog Polym Sci 70:1–17.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2017.03.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kong B, Mi S (2016) Electrospun scaffolds for corneal tissue engineering: a review. Materials 9:1–20.  https://doi.org/10.3390/ma9080614 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Konwarh R, Karak N, Misra M (2013) Electrospun cellulose acetate nanofibers: the present status and gamut of biotechnological applications. Biotechnol Adv 31:421–437.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2013.01.002 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Koul S, Prakash J, Mishra A, Kalia VC (2016) Potential emergence of multi-quorum sensing inhibitor resistant (MQSIR) bacteria. Indian J Microbiol 56:1–18.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12088-015-0558-0 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Li P, Zhang J, Liu J, Ma H, Liu J, Lie P, Wang Y, Liu G, Zeng H, Li Z, Wei X (2015) Promoting the recovery of injured liver with poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate-co-3-hydroxyhexanoate) scaffolds loaded with umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Tissue Eng 21:603–615.  https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tea.2013.0331 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lin J, Zhou W, Han S, Bunpetch V, Zhao K, Liu C, Yin Z, Ouyang H (2018) Cell-material interactions in tendon tissue engineering. Acta Biomater 70:1–11.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2018.01.012 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Loebel C, Burdick JA (2018) Engineering stem and stromal cell therapies for musculoskeletal tissue repair. Cell Stem Cell 22:325–339.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2018.01.014 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Lu X, Wang L, Yang Z, Lu H (2013) Strategies of polyhydroxyalkanoates modification for the medical application in neural regeneration/nerve tissue engineering. Adv Biosci Biotechnol 4:731–740.  https://doi.org/10.4236/abb.2013.46097 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Luef KP, Stelzer F, Wiesbrock F (2015) Poly(hydroxy alkanoate)s in medical applications. Chem Biochem Eng Q 29:287–297.  https://doi.org/10.15255/CABEQ.2014.2261 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Matthyssen S, Bogerd BV, Dhubhghaill SN, Koppen C, Zakaria N (2018) Corneal regeneration: a review of stromal replacements. Acta Biomater 69:31–41.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2018.01.023 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Misra SK, Valappil SP, Roy I, Boccaccini AR (2006) Polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA)/inorganic phase composites for tissue engineering applications. Biomacromolecules 7:2249–2258.  https://doi.org/10.1021/bm060317c CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Nisbet DR, Forsythe JS, Shen W, Finkelstein DI, Horne MK (2009) Review paper: a review of the cellular response on electrospun nanofibers for tissue engineering. J Biomater Appl 24:7–29.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0885328208099086 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Pilehvar-Soltanahmadi Y, Akbarzadeh A, Moazzez-Lalaklo N, Zarghami N (2016) An update on clinical applications of electrospun nanofibers for skin bioengineering. Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol 44:1350–1364.  https://doi.org/10.3109/21691401.2015.1036999 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Ramakrishna S, Fujihara K, Teo W-E, Yong T, Ma Z, Ramaseshan R (2006) Electrospun nanofibers: solving global issues. Mater Today 9:40–50.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-7021(06)71389-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ramier J, Bouderlique T, Stoilova O, Manolova N, Rashkov I, Langlois V, Renard E, Albanese P, Grande D (2014) Biocomposite scaffolds based on electrospun poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) nanofibers and electrosprayed hydroxyapatite nanoparticles for bone tissue engineering applications. Mater Sci Eng C 38:161–169.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2014.01.046 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Schiffman JD, Schauer L (2008) A review: electrospinning of biopolymer nanofibers and their applications. Polym Rev 48:317–352.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15583720802022182 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sell SA, McClure MJ, Garg K, Wolfe PS, Bowlin GL (2009) Electrospinning of collagen/biopolymers for regenerative medicine and cardiovascular tissue engineering. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 61:1007–1019.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2009.07.012 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Sodian R, Sperling JS, Martin DP, Egozy A, Stock U, Mayer JE, Vacanti JP (2000) Fabrication of a trileaflet heart valve scaffold from a polyhydroxyalkanoate biopolyester for use in tissue engineering. Tissue Eng 6:183–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Tang HY, Ishii D, Sudesh K, Yamaoka T, Iwata T (2010) Nanofibrous scaffolds of bio-polyesters: in vitro and in vivo characterizations and tissue response. Kumar A Nanofibers, INTECH, Rijeka, pp 189–212. ISBN:978-953-7619e-86-2Google Scholar
  44. Thenmozhi S, Dharmaraj N, Kadirvelu K, Kim HY (2017) Electrospun nanofibers: new generation materials for advanced applications. Mater Sci Eng B 217:36–48.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mseb.2017.01.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Varsha KK, Nishant G, Sneha SM, Shilpa G, Devendra L, Priya S, Nampoothiri KM (2016) Antifungal, anticancer and aminopeptidase inhibitory potential of a phenazine compound produced by Lactococcus BSN307. Indian J Microbiol 56:411–416.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12088-016-097-1 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  46. Vasita R, Katti DS (2006) Nanofibers and their applications in tissue engineering. Int J Nanomedicine 1:15–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wang W, Yeung KWK (2017) Bone grafts and biomaterials substitutes for bone defect repair: a review. Bioact Mater 2:224–247.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2017.05.007 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  48. Wang Y, Beekman J, Hew J, Jackson S, Issler-Fisher AC, Parungao R, Lajevardi SS, Li Z, Maitz PKM (2018) Burn injury: challenges and advances in burn wound healing, infection, pain and scarring. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 123:3–17.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2017.09.018 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Wu J, Hu C, Tang Z, Yu Q, Liu X, Chen H (2018) Tissue-engineered vascular grafts: balance of the four major requirements. Colloid Interface Sci Commun 23:34–44.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colcom.2018.01.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Xu XY, Li XT, Peng SW, Xiao JF, Liu C, Fang G, Chen KC, Chen GQ (2010) The behaviour of neural stem cells on polyhydroxyalkanoate nanofiber scaffolds. Biomaterials 31:3967–3975.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.01.132 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Xuezhu X, Jiang L, Zhou Z, Wu X, Wang Y (2012) Preparation and properties of electrospun soy protein isolate/polyethylene oxide nanofiber membranes. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 4:4331–4337.  https://doi.org/10.1021/am300991e CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Yang Q, Wang J, Zhang S, Tang X, Shang G, Peng Q, Wang R, Cai X (2014) The properties of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyhexanoate) and its applications in tissue engineering. Curr Stem Cell Res Ther 9:215–222.  https://doi.org/10.2174/1574888X09666140213160853 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Zhang D, Wu X, Chen J, Lin K (2018a) The development of collagen based composite scaffolds for bone regeneration. Bioact Mater 3:129–138.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2017.08.004 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Zhang J, Zhao X, Liang L, Li J, Demirci U, Wang S (2018b) A decade of progress in liver regenerative medicine. Biomaterials 157:161–176.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.11.027 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Zhuang P, Sun AX, An J, Chua CK, Chew SY (2018) 3D neural tissue models: from spheroids to bioprinting. Biomaterials 154:113–133.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.10.002 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Amity Institute of Biotechnology, Amity UniversityKolkataIndia
  2. 2.Vipragen Biosciences Private LimitedMysoreIndia

Personalised recommendations