Computer Aided Design and Synthesis for Marker Proteins of HT Carcinoma Cells: A Study

  • Shruti Jain
  • Durg Singh Chauhan


Computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system is one of the leading research topics in diagnostic radiology and medical imaging. The elementary idea of CAD is to provide a computer output to assist radiologists and other healthcare experts in reading and understanding the image and to differentiate between various anomalies. This is considered to be the “second opinion” tool in assessing the extent of disease, detecting lesions, and making diagnostic decisions for improving the interpretation component of medical imaging. The CAD system consists of input medical images, segmentation module, or region of interest (ROI) extraction module, feature extraction module, and the classification module. Various tests (parametric, nonparametric, regression analysis, clustering analysis, etc.) were discussed for different types of data variables (categorical or continuous) for different marker proteins.


Computer aided design Parametric tests Nonparametric tests Regression analysis Data preprocessing 



I wish to acknowledge the support and immerse contribution of Dr. Ayodeji Olalekan Salau of the Department of Electronics and Electrical Engineering, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria.


  1. Alvarenga AV, Infantosi AFC, Pereira WCA, Azevedo CM (2010) Assessing the performance of morphological parameters in distinguishing breast tumors on ultrasound images. Med Eng Phys 32(1):49–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alvarenga AV, Infantosi AFC, Pereira WC, Azevedo CM (2012) Assessing the combined performance of texture and morphological parameters in distinguishing breast tumors in ultrasound images. Med Phys 39(12):7350–7358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bhusri S, Jain S (2017) Classification of breast lesions using texture ratio vector technique, March 1st – 3rd, In: Proceedings of the 11th INDIACom: 4th 2017 international conference on computing for sustainable global development, BVICAM, New Delhi, pp 6289–6293Google Scholar
  4. Bhusri S, Jain S, Virmani J (2016a) Classification of breast lesions using the difference of statistical features. Res J Pharm, Biol Chem Sci 7(4):1365–1372Google Scholar
  5. Bhusri S, Jain S, Virmani J (2016b) Breast lesions classification using the Amalagation of morphological and texture features. Int J Pharm BioSci 7((2)B):617–624Google Scholar
  6. Dhiman A, Singh A, Dubey S, Jain S (2016) Design of lead II ECG waveform and classification performance for morphological features using different classifiers on lead II. Res J Pharm, Biol Chem Sci 7(4):1226–1231Google Scholar
  7. Gaudet S, Kevin JA, John AG, Emily PA, Douglas LA, Peter SK (2005) A compendium of signals and responses trigerred by prodeath and prosurvival cytokines, Manuscript M500158-MCP200Google Scholar
  8. Gomez W, de Pereira WCA, Infantosi AFC, Diaz-Perez A (2010) Computerized diagnosis of breast lesions on ultrasonography. In: XXII Congresso Brasileiro de Engenharia BiomedicaGoogle Scholar
  9. Gómez W, Pereira WCA, Infantosi AFC (2012) Analysis of co-occurrence texture statistics as a function of gray-level quantization for classifying breast ultrasound. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 31(10):1889–1899CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Huang YL, Chen DR, Jiang YR, Kuo SJ, Wu HK, Moon WK (2008) Computeraided diagnosis using morphological features for classifying breast lesions on ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 32(4):565–572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jain S (2012) Communication of signals and responses leading to cell survival / cell death using engineered regulatory networks. PhD Dissertation, Jaypee University of Information Technology, Solan, Himachal Pradesh, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  12. Liao R, Wan T, Qin Z (2011) Classification of benign and malignant breast tumors in ultrasound images based on multiple sonographic and textural features. Int Conf Intell Hum-Mach Sys Cybernet 1:71–74Google Scholar
  13. Raja BK, Madheswaran M, Thyagarajah K (2007a) Ultrasound kidney image analysis for computerized disorder identification and classification using content descriptive power spectral features. J Med Syst 31(5):307–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Raja BK, Madheswaran M, Thyagarajah K (2007b) Analysis of ultrasound kidney images using content descriptive multiple features for disorder identification and ANN based classification. Int Conf Comput, Theory Appl, ICCTA 07:382–388Google Scholar
  15. Raja BK, Madheswaran M, Thyagarajah K (2008) A hybrid fuzzy-neural system for computer-aided diagnosis of ultrasound kidney images using prominent features. J Med Syst 32(1):65–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Rana S, Jain S, Virmani J (2016a) Classification of focal kidney lesions using wavelet-based texture descriptors. Int J Pharm Bio Sci 7((3) B):646–652Google Scholar
  17. Rana S, Jain S, Virmani J (2016b) SVM-based characterization of focal kidney lesions from B-mode ultrasound images. Res J Pharm, Biol Chem Sci (RJPBCS) 7(4):837–846Google Scholar
  18. Sa Sharma S, Jain SB (2017) Two class classification of breast lesions using statistical and transform domain features. J Global Pharm Technol 9(7):18–24Google Scholar
  19. Shi X, Cheng HD, Hu L, Ju W, Tian J (2010) Detection and classification of masses in breast ultrasound images. Digital Signal Process 20(3):824–836CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Subramanya MB, Kumar V, Mukherjee S, Saini M (2014) SVM-based CAC system for B-mode kidney ultrasound images. J Digit Imaging 28:448., Society for Imaging Informatics in MedicineCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Susan Jose J, Sivakami R, Uma Maheswari N, Venkatesh R (2012) An efficient diagnosis of kidney images using association rules. Int J Comput Technol Electron Eng (IJCTEE) 2(2):14Google Scholar
  22. Wan T, Liao R, Qin Z (2011) A robust feature selection approach using low rank matrices for breast tumors in ultrasonic images. In: 18th IEEE international conference on image processingGoogle Scholar
  23. Wu WJ, Moon WK (2008) Ultrasound breast tumor image computer-aided diagnosis with texture and morphological features. Acad Radiol 15(7):873–880CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Wu WJ, Lin SW, Moon WK (2012) Combining support vector machine with genetic algorithm to classify ultrasound breast tumor images. Comput Med Imaging Graph 36(8):627–633CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shruti Jain
    • 1
    • 2
  • Durg Singh Chauhan
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Jaypee University of Information TechnologyWaknagaht, SolanIndia
  2. 2.GLA UniversityMathuraIndia

Personalised recommendations