Advertisement

Working with Assistive Technologies and People Living with Dementia

  • Grant GibsonEmail author
  • Katie Brittain
  • Louise Robinson
Chapter

Abstract

Assistive technologies (ATs) are currently put forward as one of the solutions to the growing prevalence of dementia and crises of care emerging in major Western economies. However, both design philosophies for technology in dementia and policy discourses for technology implementation have excluded people with dementia. This exclusion has meant that technology research has not yet adequately explored how people with dementia use technology in everyday practice and the spatial, social and technical arrangements in which technologies are used. In this chapter, we explore how technology use among people with dementia is conceptualised, before discussing some of the issues which influence how people with dementia use technologies. We argue that a more nuanced understanding of technologies is gained through exploring the social and technical arrangements in which they are used. Drawing on the notion of an ethics in practice, we also explore how people living with dementia negotiate the dilemmas arising from the everyday use of technology. Finally, the chapter discusses alternative methodologies for investigating technology use in dementia based on co-creation and co-production, alongside some of the practical issues arising when conducting research in relation to technology and its role in dementia care.

Keywords

Assistive technology Telecare People living with dementia Ethics in practice Co-production 

Notes

Funding Statement

This paper presents independent research funded in part by the UK National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) under its ‘Research Professorship’ scheme (Reference Number NIHR-RP-011-043). The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR of the Department of Health.

References

  1. Arntzen, C., Holthe, T., & Jentoft, R. (2016). Tracing the successful incorporation of assistive technology into everyday life for younger people with dementia and family carers. Dementia, 15(4), 646–662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baker, S., Waycott, J., Vetere, F., & Hoang, T. (2018). The technology explorers: Partnering with older adults to engage with virtual reality and virtual avatars. In B. Neves & F. Vetere (Eds.), Ageing and digital technology: Designing and evaluating emerging technologies for older adults.Google Scholar
  3. Brittain, K., Degnen, C., Gibson, G., Dickinson, C., & Robinson, L. (2017). When walking becomes wandering: Representing the fear of the fourth age. Sociology of Health & Illness, 39(2), 270–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cook, E. Randhawa, G., Guppy, A., Sharp, C., Barton, G., Bateman, A., & Crawford-White, J. (2017). Exploring factors that impact the decision to use assistive telecare: Perspectives of family caregivers of older people in the United Kingdom. Ageing and Society. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X1700037X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Draper, H., & Sorell, T. (2013). Telecare, remote monitoring and care. Bioethics, 27(7), 365–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dunk, B., Longman, B., & Newton, L. (2010). GPS technologies in managing the risks associated with safer walking in people with dementia—A practical perspective. Journal of Assistive Technologies, 4(3), 4–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fisk, M. (2015). Surveillance technologies in care homes: Seven principles for their use. Working with Older People, 19(2), 51–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gibson, G., Dickinson, C., Brittain, K., & Robinson, L. (2015). The everyday use of assistive technology by people with dementia and their family carers: A qualitative study. BMC Geriatrics.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-015-0091-3.
  9. Gibson, G., Newton, L., Pritchard, G., Finch, T., Brittain, K., & Robinson, L. (2016). The provision of assistive technology products and services for people with dementia in the United Kingdom. Dementia, 15(4), 681–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Greenhalgh, T. (2012). The organising vision for telehealth and telecare: Discourse analysis. BMJ Open, 2(4). http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Greenhalgh, T., Fahy, N., & Shaw, S. (2018). The bright elusive butterfly of value in health technology development: Comment on 'Proividing value to new health technology: the early contribution of entrepreneurs, investors and regulatory agencies. International Journal of Health Policy and Management., 7(1), 81–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Greenhalgh, T., Fahy, N., & Shaw, S. (2017). The bright effusive butterfly of value in health technology development. International Journal of Health Policy and Management. doi: 0.15171/ijhpm.2017.65.Google Scholar
  13. Greenhalgh, T., Procter, R., Wherton, J., Sugarhood, P., Hinder, S., & Rouncefield, M. (2015). What is quality in assisted living technology? The ARCHIE framework for effective telehealth and telecare services. BMC Medicine, 13(91).  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-015-0279-6.
  14. Greenhalgh, T., Shaw, S., Wherton, J., Hughes, G., Lynch, J., A’Court, C., … & Stones, R. (2016). SCALS: A fourth generation study of assisted living technologies in their organisational, social, political and policy context. BMJ Open, 6(2). http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Guillemin, M., & Gillam, L. (2004). Ethics, reflexivity, and “ethically important moments” in research. Qualitative Inquiry, 10(2), 261–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hall, A., Brown Wilson, C., Stanmore, E., & Todd, C. (2017). Implementing monitoring technologies in care homes for people with dementia: A qualitative exploration using Normalisation process theory. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 72, 60–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Joyce, K., & Loe, M. (2010). Technogenarians: Studying health and illness through an ageing, science and technology lens. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kinder, T. (2010). Social innovation in services: Technologically assisted new care models for people with dementia and their usability. International Journal of Technology Management, 51(1), 106–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Landau, R., & Werner, S. (2012). Ethical aspects of using GPS for tracking people with dementia: Recommendations for practice. International Psychogeriatrics, 24(3), 358–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lehoux, P., Miller, F., Daudelin, G., & Denis, J. (2017). Providing value to new health technology: The early contribution on entrepreneurs, investors and regulatory agencies. International Journal of Health Policy and Management. Available at http://ijhpm.com/article_3314.html.
  21. Lindsay S., Brittain K., Jackson D., Ladha C., Ladha K., & Olivier P. (2012). Empathy, participatory design and people with dementia. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 521–530, May 5).Google Scholar
  22. Lopez Gomez, D. (2015). Little arrangements that matter. Rethinking autonomy-enabling innovations for later life. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 93, 91–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Megges, H., Freiesleben, S., Jankowski, N., Haas, B., & Peters, O. (2017). Technology for home dementia care: A prototype locating system put to the test. Alzheimers & Dementia: Translational Research and Clinical Interventions, 3(3), 332–338.Google Scholar
  24. Meiland, F., Innes, A., Robinson, L., van der Roest, H, Garcia-Casal, J., Gove, D., … & Franco-Martin, M. (2017). Technologies to support community-dwelling persons with dementia: A position paper on issues regarding development, usability, effectiveness and cost-effectiveness, deployment, and ethics. JIMR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies, 1(e1).  https://doi.org/10.2196/rehab.6376. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Metropolitan Police. (2017). Met launches Safer Walking campaign. http://news.met.police.uk/news/met-launches-safer-walking-campaign-242404.
  26. Mort, M., Roberts, C., & Callen, B. (2012). Ageing with telecare: Care or coercion in austerity? Sociology of Health & Illness, 35(6), 799–812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Orpwood, R., Chadd, J., Howcroft, D., Sixsmith, A., Torrington, J., Gibson, G., et al. (2010). Designing technology to improve quality of life for people with dementia: User led approaches. Universal Access in the Information Society, 9, 249–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Orpwood, R., Sixsmith, A., Torrington, J., Chadd, J., & Chalfont, G. (2007). Designing technology to support quality of life of people with dementia. Technology and Disability, 19(2–3), 103–112.Google Scholar
  29. Pols, J. (2010). What patients care about. In A. Mol, I. Moser, & J. Pols (Eds.), Care in practice: On tinkering in clinics, homes and farms. Bielefeld: Verlag.Google Scholar
  30. Pritchard, G., & Brittain, K. (2015). Alarm pendants and the technological shaping of older people’s care: Between (intentional) help and (irrational) nuisance. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 93, 124–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Robinson, L., Brittain, K., Lindsay, S., Jackson, D., & Olivier, P. (2009). Keeping In Touch Everyday (KITE) project: Developing assistive technologies with people with dementia and carers to promote independence. International Psychogeriatrics, 21(3), 494–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rosenberg, L., & Nygard, L. (2012). Persons with dementia become users of assistive technology: A study of the process. Dementia, 11(2), 135–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Steventon, A., Bardsley, M., Billings, J., Dixon, J., Doll, H., & Beynon, M. (2013). Effect of telecare on use of health and social care services: Findings from the whole systems demonstrator cluster randomised trial. Age and Ageing, 42(4), 501–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Swaffer, K. (2016). Co-production and engagement of people with dementia: The issue of ethics and creative or intellectual copyright. Dementia, 15(6), 1319–1325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Tan, L., & Szebeko, D. (2009). Co-designing for dementia: The Alzheimer 100 project. Australasian Medical Journal, 1(12), 185–198.Google Scholar
  36. UK Government. (2005). Mental capacity act. London: UK Government.Google Scholar
  37. Van Der Roest, H., Wenborn, J., Pastink, C., Droes, R., & Orrell, M. (2017). Assistive technology for memory support in dementia. Cochrane database of Systematic Reviews, (6).  https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd009627.pub2.
  38. Vines, J., Pritchard, G., Wright, P., Olivier, P., & Brittain, K. (2015). An age-old problem: Examining the discourses of ageing in HCI and strategies for future research. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 22(1), 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wherton, J., & Monk, A. (2008). Technological opportunities for supporting people with dementia who are living at home. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 66(8), 571–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wherton, J., Sugarhood, P., Procter, R., Hinder, S., & Greenhalgh, T. (2015). Co-production in practice: How people with assisted living needs can help design and evolve technologies and services. Implementation Science,10 (75).  https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-015-0271.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of StirlingStirlingScotland, UK
  2. 2.Northumbria UniversityNewcastle upon TyneEngland, UK
  3. 3.Newcastle UniversityNewcastle upon TyneEngland, UK

Personalised recommendations