Advertisement

Ecological Holism: Arne Naess’s Gestalt Ontology and Merleau-Ponty’s Bodily-Flesh Phenomenology

  • Su-chen Wu
Chapter

Abstract

Spirituality does not only concern our own inner development but is also a way of living in which we feel love and concern for all life in the universe. In the West, there are several modern theories which call for a new relationship between humans and nature. Such a relationship would acknowledge the equality and interrelatedness of humans and nature. As a French phenomenological philosopher, Maurice Merleau-Ponty’s philosophy evolved into an emphasis on the body and the concrete “life-world.” He attempted to develop a conception of the world, others, and himself, and, in particular, their interrelations. His philosophy of hermeneutical phenomenology of the body and flesh has particularly informed my thinking about our existence in the world and our relationship to the earth. Deep Ecology is inextricably associated with Arne Naess, whose gestalt ontology is significant in that it makes a central place for questions about the implications of our conceptions of nature and of what is other than human. The chief ecological ideas revealed in Merleau-Ponty’s philosophy of the structure of being correspond with the principles of the modern ecological arguments of Deep Ecology in its holistic worldviews: the assertion of the interrelatedness between human self and the natural world. In my paper, I make a comparative study between Arne Naess’s Gestalt ontology of Deep ecology and Merleau-Ponty’s philosophy arising from his bodily-flesh Phenomenology. This essay attempts to illustrate how the holistic thinking within both offers a new and fresh perspective on how humans, animals, plants, and ecosystems are closely connected and interrelated.

Keywords

Arne Naess Maurice Merleau-Ponty Deborah Du Nann Winter 

Bibliography

  1. Abram, David. (1988). “Merleau-Ponty and the Voice of the Earth.” Environmental Ethics, 10(2), 101–120. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. ———. (1996). The Spell of the Sensuous: Perception and Language in a More-Than Human World. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
  3. Bannan, John F. (1967). The Philosophy of Merleau-Ponty. New York: Harcount.Google Scholar
  4. Capra, Fritjof. (1996). The Web of Life a New Scientific Understanding of Living Systems. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
  5. Conn, Sarah A. (1995). “When the Earth Hurts, Who Responds?” In Ecopsychology: Restoring the Earth, Healing the Mind (eds.), Theodore Roszak, M. Gomes, and A. Kanner. San Francisco: Sierra Club Books.Google Scholar
  6. Devall, Bill. (1988). Simple in Means, Rich in Ends: Practicing Deep Ecology. Salt Lake City: Peregrine Smith. Google Scholar
  7. Devall, B., & George Sessions. (1984). “The Development of Natural Resources and the Integrity of Nature.” Environmental Ethics, 6(Winter), 293–322. Google Scholar
  8. ———. (1985). Deep Ecology: Living as If Nature Mattered. Salt Lake City, Utah: Peregrine Smith Books.Google Scholar
  9. Dillon, Martin C. (1988). Merleau-Ponty’s Ontology, 2nd edition. Evanston, IL: Northwestern.Google Scholar
  10. Fox, Warwick. (1990). “The Meanings of ‘Deep Ecology’.” The Trumpeter: Journal of Ecosophy, 7, 98–101. Google Scholar
  11. ———. (1995). Toward a Transpersonal Ecology: Developing New Foundations for Environmentalism. New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  12. Frese, Werner Sattmann. (2005). Sustainable Living for a Sustainable Earth: From an Education for a Sustainable Development Towards an Education for Sustainable Living. Diss: Western Sydney University.Google Scholar
  13. Grey, William. (1993). “Anthropocentrism and Deep Ecology.” Australiasian Journal of Philosophy, 71(4), 463–475. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kaiser, L. (2000). “Spirituality and the Physician Executive: Reconciling the Inner Self and the Business of Health Care.” The Physician Executive, 26(2), 6–13.Google Scholar
  15. Katz, Eric, Andrew Light, & David Rothenberg (eds.). (2000). Beneath the Surface: Critical Essays in the Philosophy of Deep Ecology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  16. Langer, Monika
. (
1989). Merleau-Ponty’s 
Phenomenology 
of 
Perception:
A 
Guide and Commentary.
Tallahassee:
 The
 Florida
 University
 Press.
Google Scholar
  17. Levin, David Michael. (1991). “Visions of Narcissism: Intersubjectivity and the Reversals of Reflection.” In Merleau-Ponty Vivant (ed.), Martin Dillon. SUNY Press. Google Scholar
  18. Low, Douglas. (2000). Merleau-Ponty’s Last Vision: A Proposal for the Completion of the Visible and the Invisible. Evanston, IL: Northwestern.Google Scholar
  19. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. (1962). Phenomenology of Perception, Colin Smith (trans.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. ———. (1968). The Visible and the Invisible, Claude Lefort (ed.), Alphonso Lingis (trans.). Evanston, IL: Northwestern.Google Scholar
  21. Naess, Arne. (1973). “The Shallow and the Deep, Long-Range Ecology Movement: A Summary.” Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy and the Social Sciences, 16(1), 95–100.Google Scholar
  22. ———. (1984). “Identification as a Source of Deep Ecological Attitudes.” In Deep Ecology (ed.), Michael Tobias. San Diego: Avant Books.Google Scholar
  23. ———. (1986). “The Deep Ecological Movement: Some Philosophical Aspects.” In Deep Ecology for the Twenty-First Century (ed.), George Sessions. Boston: Shambhala.Google Scholar
  24. ———. (1990). Ecology, Community and Lifestyle. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  25. ———. (1993). Is It Painful to Think? In Conversations with Arne Naess, David Rothenberg (ed.). Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  26. ———. (1995a). “Ecosophy and Gestalt Ontology.” In Deep Ecology for the Twenty- First Century (ed.), George Sessions. Boston: Shambhala.Google Scholar
  27. ———. (1995b). “Self-Realization: An Ecological Approach to Being in the World.” In The Deep Ecology Movement: An Introductory Anthology (ed.), Alan Drengson and Yuichi Inoue. Berkeley: North Atlantic Books.Google Scholar
  28. Naess, Arne, John Seed, Joanna Macy, & Pat Fleming. (1998). Thinking Like a Mountain. London: Heretic Books. Google Scholar
  29. Naess, Arne, & Per Ingvar Haukeland. (2002). Life’s Philosophy: Reason and Feeling in a Deeper World, Roland Huntford (trans.). Athens: University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
  30. Winter, D. (1996). Ecological Psychology: Healing the Split Between Planet and Self. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Su-chen Wu
    • 1
  1. 1.Fo Guang UniversityYilanTaiwan

Personalised recommendations