Advertisement

Effects of Edible Chitosan Coating on Postharvest Quality of Zigui Navel Orange

  • Jinli Li
  • Yuye Zhong
  • Shaoyun Huang
  • Ting Guo
  • Li Cheng
  • Houbin LiEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 543)

Abstract

In order to study the preservation effect of chitosan coating on Zigui navel orange at room temperature (20 ± 5 °C), the coating solution was prepared by using chitosan as film-forming agent and citric acid and glacial acetic acid as solvents. The existing wax coating solution was used as the control. The experimental navel oranges were coated on the surface by impregnation method and stored at room temperature (20 ± 5 °C) for 35 days. Changes of physical, chemical and sensory quality indexes were determined periodically during storage time. The results were compared and analyzed. The experimental results showed that the coating effect of citric acid as the solvent is better than that of glacial acetic acid and the control treatments. In addition, the quality of navel oranges in 1.5%w/v citric acid treatment was the best in the three different concentrations treatments. After 35 days, the decay rate, total soluble solid and vitamin C content were detected in this treatment. The results suggested that 1.5% w/v citric acid had better potential in prolonging the shelf-life of Zigui navel orange.

Keywords

Chitosan coating Packaging navel orange Postharvest quality 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study is funded by a Key Project of Science and Technology Plan of Jingmen (YFZD2017013) and Research project of Hubei province for young talent (Q20184301).

Ethics Compliance Comments

The methodology used in this paper does not require institutional ethical approval. The reason is that there were no animals involved in the experiments, and all the chemical reagents applied to the fruits were metabolizable. Informed consent was obtained from all subjects.

References

  1. 1.
    Zeng, R., Zhang, A., Chen, J., & Fu, Y. (2012). Postharvest quality and physiological responses of clove bud extract dip on ‘Newhall’ navel orange. Scientia Horticulturae, 138, 253–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kouassiab, K. H. S., & Jijakli, H. (2012). The control of postharvest blue and green molds of citrus in relation with essential oil-wax formulations, adherence and viscosity. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 73, 122–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Arpaia, M. L., Kader, A. A. (2013). Orange: Recommendations for maintaining postharvest quality. http://postharvest.ucdavis.edu/PFfruits/Orange/. Accessed 30 June 2013.
  4. 4.
    Ladaniya, M. S. (2008). Citrus fruit, biology, technology and evaluation (p. 455). London, UK: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cooksy, K. (2005). Effectiveness of antimicrobial food packaging materials. Food Additives & Contaminants, 22, 980–987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Srinivasa, P. C., & Tharnathan, R. N. (2007). Chitin/chitosan-safe, ecofriendly packaging materials with multiple potential uses. Food Reviews International, 23, 53–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wang, X., Du, Y., Luo, J., Lin, B., & Kennedy, J. F. (2007). Chitosan/organic rectorite nanocomposite films: Structure, characteristic and drug delivery behaviour. Carbohydrate Polymers, 69, 41–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sebastien, F., Stephane, G., Copinet, A., & Coma, V. (2006). Novel biodegradable films made from chitosan and poly (lactic acid) with antifungal properties against mycotoxinogen strains. Carbohydrate Polymers, 65, 185–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rabea, E. I., Badawy, M. E. I., Steurbaut, W., & Stevens, C. V. (2009). In vitro assessment of N-(benzyl) chitosan derivatives against some plant pathogenic bacteria and fungi. European Polymer Journal, 45, 237–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Liu, F., Chen, M., & Chen, J. Y. (2010). Antifungal activity of chitosan on Penicillium italicum in postharvest ‘Newhall’ navel orange fruits. Acta Agriculturae Universitatis Jiangxiensis, 121, 51–58.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Arnon, H., Granit, R., Porat, R., & Poverenov, E. (2015). Development of polysaccharidesbased edible coatings for citrus fruits: A layer-by-layer approach. Food Chemistry, 166, 465–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hussain, S. B., Shi, C. Y., Guo, L. X., Kamran, H. M., Sadka, A., & Liu, Y. Z. (2017). Recent advances in the regulation of citric acid metabolism in citrus fruit. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 36, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yu, T., Yu, C., Chen, F., Sheng, K., Zhou, T., Zunun, M., et al. (2012). Integrated control of blue mold in pear fruit by combined application of chitosan, a biocontrol yeast and calcium chloride. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 69, 49–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chen, M., Xie, X., Lin, Q., Chen, J., Grierson, D., Yin, X., et al. (2013). Differential expression of organic acid degradation-related genes during fruit development of navel oranges (Citrus sinensis) in two habitats. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter, 31, 1131–1140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ye, M. Z., Chen, Q. X., Xu, J. Z., Xu, X. Z., Zhao, M., & Xia, K. S. (2000). Some physiological changes and storability of citrus fruits during storage. Plant Physiology Communications, 36, 125–127.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tunc, S., Chollet, E., Chalier, P., Preziosi-Belloy, L., & Gontard, N. (2007). Combined effect of volatile antimicrobial agents on the growth of Penicillium notatum. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 113, 263–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jinli Li
    • 1
  • Yuye Zhong
    • 2
  • Shaoyun Huang
    • 1
    • 2
  • Ting Guo
    • 1
  • Li Cheng
    • 1
  • Houbin Li
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Printing EngineeringJingchu University of TechnologyJingmenChina
  2. 2.School of Printing and PackagingWuhan UniversityWuhanChina

Personalised recommendations