Advertisement

Introduction

  • Yu-Leng LinEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Frontiers in Chinese Linguistics book series (FiCL, volume 8)

Abstract

This monograph tests for a substantive bias, the proposed universal implicational nasalized segment hierarchy in vowel–consonant nasal harmony, using an artificial grammar paradigm.

References

  1. Blevins, Juliette. 2006. A theoretical synopsis of evolutionary phonology. Theoretical Linguistics 32: 117–165.Google Scholar
  2. Blevins, Juliette. 2004. Evolutionary phonology. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Boersma, Paul. (1998). Functional phonology: Formalizing the interactions between articulatory and perceptual drives. Doctoral dissertation, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  4. Botma, Bert. 2011. Sonorants. In The Blackwell companion to phonology, ed. Marc van Oostendorp, Colin J. Ewen, Elizabeth Hume, and Keren Rice, 171–194. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  5. Cohn, Abigail. (1993). The status of nasalized continuants. In Nasals, Nasalization, and the Velum. Phonetics and phonology, vol. 5, pp. 329–367, ed. Marie, K. Huffman, and Rena Krakow (eds.). San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  6. Cohn, Abigail. 1990. Phonetic and phonological rules of nasalization. Doctoral dissertation, UCLA. [UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 76].Google Scholar
  7. Finley, Sara. 2011. The privileged status of locality in consonant harmony. Journal of Memory and Language 65: 74–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Finley, Sara, and William Badecker. 2009. Artificial language learning and feature-based generalization. Journal of Memory and Language 61: 423–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Finley, Sara, and William Badecker. 2010. In Linguistic and non-linguistic influences on learning biases for vowel harmony, ed. Ohlsson Stellan and Richard Catrambone, 706–711. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar
  10. Gómez, Rebecca L., and LouAnn Gerken. 1999. Artificial grammar learning by 1-year-olds leads to specific and abstract knowledge. Cognition 70: 109–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lin, Yu-Leng. 2010. Testing universal grammar in phonological artificial grammar learning. Master’s thesis. National Chung Cheng University, Taiwan.Google Scholar
  12. Mielke, Jeff. (2011). Distinctive features. In The Blackwell companion to phonology,ed. Marc van Oostendorp, Colin Ewen, Elizabeth Hume, and Keren Rice. pp. 391–415. Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  13. Moreton, Elliott. 2008. Analytic bias and phonological typology. Phonology 25 (1): 83–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Moreton, Elliott. 2012. Inter- and intra-dimensional dependencies in implicit phonotactic learning. Journal of Memory and Language 67 (1): 165–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Moreton, Elliott, and Joe Pater. 2012a. Structure and substance in artificial-phonology learning, Part I: Structure. Language and Linguistics Compact 686–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Moreton, Elliott, and Joe Pater. 2012b. Structure and substance in artificial-phonology learning, Part I: Substance. Language and Linguistics Compact 702–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Nevins, Andrew. 2009. On formal universals in phonology. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32: 461–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Parker, Steve. 2008. Sound level protrusions as physical correlates of sonority. Journal of Phonetics 36: 55–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Parker, Steve. 2011. Sonority. In The Blackwell companion to phonology, ed. Marc van Oostendorp, Colin J. Ewen, Elizabeth Hume, and Keren Rice, 1160–1184. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  20. Piggott, Glyne L. 1992. Variability in feature dependency: The case of nasality. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 10: 33–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Piggott, Glyne L., and Harry van der Hulst. 1997. Locality and the nature of nasal harmony. Lingua 103: 85–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pycha, Anne, Pawel Nowak, Eurie Shin, and Ryan Shosted. 2003. Phonological rule-learing and its implications for a theory of vowel harmony. In Proceedings of the 22nd West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (WCCFL 22), pp. 101–114, ed. Mimu Tsujimura, and Gina Garding. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
  23. Reber, Arthur S. (1967). Implicit learning of artificial grammars. Journal of Verbal Learning 855–863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Walker, Rachel. 2000. Nasalization, neutral segments and opacity effects. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
  25. Walker, Rachel. 2011. Nasal harmony. In The Blackwell Companion to Phonology, ed. Marc van Oostendorp, Colin Ewen, Elizabeth Hume, and Keren Rice, 1838–1865. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  26. Walker, Rachel. (1998). Nasalization, neutral segments, and opacity effects. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Santa Cruz.Google Scholar
  27. Wilson, Colin. 2003. Experimental investigation of phonological naturalness. WCCFL 22: 533–546.Google Scholar
  28. Wilson, Colin. 2006. Learning phonology with substantive bias: An experimental and computational study of velar palatalization. Cognitive Science 30: 945–982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Peking University Press and Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Foreign Languages and LiteraturesFeng Chia UniversityTaichungTaiwan

Personalised recommendations