Advertisement

Productivism, Financialisation, and the “Good Farmer”: Constructing a Rational, Governable Farming Sector

  • Patrick O’Keeffe
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter addresses the concept of productivity in the context of structural adjustment policies implemented by the Australian Government in recent decades. I suggest this focus reduces the value of farming, and of farmers, to the capacity to be productive. As in the normalisation of competition as a process of creating winners and losers, I show that structural adjustment normalises farmer exits as an essential step in maximising industry efficiency and productivity. I then develop this idea further by arguing that these reductionist policy constructions externalise the social and environmental consequences of the neoliberalisation of Australian agricultural and rural industries. Drawing on policy discourses around agriculture, specifically, structural adjustment and the construction of farmers’ identity, I explore the construction of farming as a reducible, calculable function which the state is able to act upon to meet its objective of maximising productive resource use.

References

  1. Allen Consulting, (2000), The Wheat Marketing Act 1989 – The Economic Impact of Competitive Restrictions, Sydney: Allen Consulting Group.Google Scholar
  2. Argent, N., (2005), The neoliberal seduction: Governing-at-a-distance, community development and the battle over financial services provision in Australia, Geographical Research, 43(1), pp. 29–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Burch, D., Dixon, J., and Lawrence, G., (2013), Introduction to the symposium on the changing role of supermarkets in global supply chains: From seedling to supermarket: Agrifood supply chains in transition, Agriculture and Human Values, 30, pp. 215–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cheshire, L., and Lawrence, G., (2005), Neoliberalism, Individualisation and Community: Regional Restructuring in Australia, Social Identities, 11(5), pp. 435–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Clapp, J., (2015), Distant agricultural landscapes, Sustain Sci, 10, pp. 305–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Commonwealth of Australia, (2013), Agricultural Competitiveness White Paper: Terms of reference, [online] http://agwhitepaper.agriculture.gov.au/supporting-information/key-documents/terms-of-reference [Accessed December 12 2016].
  7. Commonwealth of Australia, (2015), Agricultural Competitiveness White Paper: Stronger farmers, stronger communities, [online] http://agwhitepaper.agriculture.gov.au/ [Accessed June 6 2016].
  8. Dean, M., (1999), Governmentality: Power and Rule in Modern Society, London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  9. Dibden, J., Potter, C., and Cocklin, C., (2009), Contesting the neoliberal project for agriculture: Productivist and multifunctional trajectories in the European Union and Australia, Journal of Rural Studies, 25(3), pp. 299–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fairbairn, M., (2014), ‘Like gold with yield’: Evolving intersections between farmland and finance, Journal of Peasant Studies, 41(5), pp. 777–795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Financial Review, (1992), The best in the bush, August 28 1992.Google Scholar
  12. Gill, F., (2011), Responsible agents: Responsibility and the changing relationship between farmers and the state. Rural Society 20(2): 128–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gray, E., Oss-Emer, M., and Sheng, Y., (2014), Australian agricultural productivity growth: Past reforms and future opportunities, Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences, Research Report 14.2, Canberra, February.Google Scholar
  14. Higgins, V., Dibden, J., and Cocklin, C., (2015), Private agri-food governance and greenhouse gas abatement: Constructing a corporate carbon economy, Geoforum, 66, pp. 75–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Higgins, V., (2002), Constructing reform: Economic expertise and the governing of agricultural change in Australia, New York: Nova Science Publishers.Google Scholar
  16. Higgins, V., (2001), Governing the boundaries of viability: Economic expertise and the production of the ‘low income farm problem’ in Australia, Sociologia Ruralis, 41(3), pp. 358–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Higgins, V., and Lockie, S., (2002), Re-discovering the social: neo-liberalism and hybrid practices of governing in rural natural resource management, Journal of Rural Studies, 18, pp. 419–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hilmer, F, Rayner, M., and Taperell, G., (1993), National Competition Policy Review, [online] http://ncp.ncc.gov.au/docs/National%20Competition%20Policy%20Review%20report,%20The%20Hilmer%20Report,%20August%201993.pdf [Accessed July 30 2015].
  19. Industry Commission, (1991), Statutory marketing arrangements for primary products, Report No. 10, Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.Google Scholar
  20. Irving, M., Arney, J., and Linder, B., (2000), National Competition Policy review of the Wheat Marketing Act 1989, Canberra: National Competition Policy – Wheat Marketing Act Review Committee.Google Scholar
  21. Knopke, P., O’Donnell, V., and Shepherd, A., (2000), Productivity growth in the Australian grains industry, ABARE Research Report 2000.1, Canberra.Google Scholar
  22. Larner, W., (2000), Post-welfarist state governance: Towards a code of social and family responsibility, Social Politics 7(2): 244–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lawrence, G., Richards, C., and Lyons, K., (2013), Food security in Australia in an era of neoliberalism, productivism and climate change, Journal of Rural Studies, 29(1), pp. 30–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lockie S, and Higgins, V., (2007), Roll-out neoliberalism and hybrid practices of regulation in Australian agri-environmental governance, Journal of Rural Studies, 23(1), pp. 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Martin, S., and Clapp, J., (2015), Finance for agriculture or agriculture for finance?, Journal of Agrarian Change, 15(4), pp. 549–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. McKee, K., (2008), Transforming Scotland’s public-sector housing through community ownership: The reterritorialisation of housing governance, Space and Polity, 12(2), pp. 183–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Miller, P., and Rose, N., (1990), Governing economic life, Economy and Society, 19(1), pp. 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Murphy, S., Burch, D., and Clapp, J., (2012), Cereal Secrets: The world’s largest grain traders and global agriculture, [online] http://www.oxfam.org/sites/www.oxfam.org/files/rr-cereal-secrets-grain-traders-agriculture-30082012-en.pdf [Accessed October 28 2014].
  29. Nevile, J., (1971), The government, the economy and productivity, in Nevile, J., Le Couteur, G., and Bell, H., (eds), Productivity, Sydney: Committee for Economic Development of Australia.Google Scholar
  30. Nossal, K., and Gooday, P., (2009), Raising productivity growth in Australian agriculture, ABARE project 3425, Canberra: Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics.Google Scholar
  31. Nossal, K., Zhao, S., Sheng, Y., and Gunasekera, D., (2009), Productivity movements in Australian agriculture, Australian Commodities, 16(1), pp. 206–216.Google Scholar
  32. Pritchard, B., (2005), Unpacking the neoliberal approach to regional policy: A close reading of John Freebairn’s ‘Economic policy for rural and regional Australia’, Geographical Research, 43(1), pp. 103–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Productivity Commission, (2010), Wheat export marketing arrangements: Report no. 51, AGPS, Canberra.Google Scholar
  34. Productivity Commission, (2005), Trends in Australian agriculture, Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.Google Scholar
  35. Royal Commission into Grain Storage, Handling and Transport, (1988), Royal Commission into Grain Storage, Handling and Transport, Canberra: AGPS.Google Scholar
  36. Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation, (2007), Drivers of structural change in Australian agriculture, RIRDC Publication No 07/057, Canberra: Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation.Google Scholar
  37. Salerno, T., (2017), Cargill’s corporate growth in times of crisis: How agro-commodity traders are increasing profits in the midst of volatility, Agriculture and Human Values, 34, pp. 211–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sippel, S., Larder, N., and Lawrence, G., (2017), Grounding the financialisation of farmland: Perspectives on financial actors as new land owners in rural Australia, Agriculture and Human Values, 34(2), pp. 251–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Patrick O’Keeffe
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Global, Urban & Social StudiesRoyal Melbourne Institute of TechnologyMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations