Advertisement

Collaboration Science in the Age of Digitalization

  • Masayuki MatsuiEmail author
Chapter
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Business book series (BRIEFSBUSINESS)

Abstract

Artifacts bodies and its science are known as the theory of 3M&I bodies, which consist of human, material/machine, monetary, and informational components. For multi-body systems, the former chapter, Sect.  2.1, discusses and develops the scientific and economic fundamentals using Follett-like classification with domination, compromise, integration, and sharing in two-center conflict outcomes (1983). The mathematical view is based on Venn diagrams, the physical view is based on the principle of a lever as explained by Archimedes, and the economical view is based on profit (specific gravity) and Matsui’s equation. Based on these, it is observed that integration pursues maximization of intersection (compromise) in the two-center, whereas sharing pursues minimization of intersection (compromise) in the field. When the marginal (equivalently, maximal) profit is equal, both are pointed out to be similar in a dual of classical Nash’s solution. This property gives visibility and equilibrium to a two-center problem with pair-map in the broad sense, and would contribute to the advancement of digital society and its visibility and harmony in integration versus sharing. In an increasingly ICT society, the concept of traditional collaboration that is known by Herbert Simon’s behavioral approach has been recently redefined and adapted to digital collaboration, and would help the visualization and realization of artifacts collaboration. The latter chapter, Sect.  2.2, treats a systematic matrix (white-box) framework for the coordination problem of functions and roles in a collaborative organization, which is a broader network of 3M&I elements and the ultimate subject of the 3M&I-artifacts system. The sophisticated (matrix) approach is a white-box (Haiku-like) method given by Matsui’s ME (SMDP/PDCA), and regards the system of collaboration as being composed of “matrix (skeleton) × communication (message)” processes that move from problem-solving toward goal-seeking in an organization. The dual relation of functions versus roles (Nash’s solution) would be useful for goal-seeking organizational collaboration, and the algorithms and AI-logic of the Big Data world.

Keywords

Artifacts body Analog versus digital collaboration Sharing versus integration Lever/gravity rule Duality Smart (matrix) approach 

References

  1. 1.
    Matsui, M. (2008). The manufacturing and service enterprise with risks: A stochastic management approach. International Series in OR&MS, No. 125, Springer.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Matsui, M. (1983). A game-theoretic consideration of order-selection and switch-over policy (pp. 48–49). Tokyo, Japan: Reprints of Japan Industrial Management Association. (In Japanese).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Matsui, M., Ceroni, J., & Nof, S. (1997). A coordination consideration of manufacturing systems: Job shop case. In Proceedings of International Conference on Production Research (pp. 834–837), Osaka, Japan.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Matsui, M. (2002). A management game model: Economic Traffic, leadtime and pricing settings. Journal of Japan Industrial Management Association, 53(1), 1–9.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Matsui, M. (2016). Fundamentals and principles of artifacts science: 3M&I-body system. Springer Briefs in Business.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nof, S. Y., Ceroni, J., Jeong, W., & Moghaddam, M. (2015). Revolutionizing collaboration through e-Work, e-Business, and e-Service, automation, collaboration, and e-Service (ACES). Springer. (Book Series).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Follet, M. P. (1949). Freedom & coordination—Lecture in business organization. In L. H. Urwick (Ed.), London: Pitman Publishing.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Matsui, M. (2010). Division of work, stochastic (re-)balancing and demand speed: From assembly line toward demand chain, invited paper. Journal of Japan Industrial Management Association, 60(6E), 324–330.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Matsui, M. (2015). The invisible body-balancing economics: A medium approach. Theoretical Economics Letters, 5, 65–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Smith, A. (1776). The wealth of nations. Encyclopedia Britannica. (1952 Edition).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kotler, P. T., & Keller, K. L. (1965). Marketing management. Pearson (14th, ed.) (1911).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Eliashberg, J., & Steinberg, R. (1993). Marketing-production joint decision-making. In J. Eliashberg & Q. L. Lilien (Eds.), Marketing, handbook in OR&MS (Vol. 5, Chap. 18). Elsevier.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yuasa, K., & Matsui, M. (2003). VMI (Vender managed inventory)—New business model toward no-inventory management. Nikkan Kogyo Shinbun. (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Matsui, M. (2014). The manufacturing and service enterprise with risks: II: The physics and economics of management. Springer.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Matsui, M., Yamada, T., & Takanokura, M. (2016) Science of collaboration, balancing versus sharing: A mathematical. Physical and economical view. In Proceedings of Asia Pacific Industrial Engineering and Management Systems Conference, Taipei, Taiwan.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    March, J. G., & Simon, H. A. (1993). Organizations. NY: Wiley (1st. 1958, 2nd).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ross, S.M. (1970). Applied probability models with optimization applications. NY: Dover Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Matsui, M. (2017) Graphical SW-solution for Matsui's ME: A physical-particle from dual chain of enterprise vs Physics body and lattice-structure solution. In Oukan Conference 2017, A–5–1, Oukan: Transdisciplinary Federal of Science and Technology, Kyoto: Ritsumeikan University. (In Japanese).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Matsui, M. (2012). Economic station-centered network and invisible collaboration: A cyclic versus semi-cyclic view. Theoretical Economic Letters, 2, 344–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ashby, W. R. (1956). An introduction to cybernetics. London: Chapman & Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Attneave, F. (1959). Applications of information theory to psychology: A summary of basic concepts, method, and results. NY: Henry Holt and Co.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Matsui, M., & Sanae, H. (1974). A study of job attributes and the worker in the production processes. Journal of Japan Industrial Management Association, 25(3), 202–207. (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hitomi, K. (1996). Manufacturing systems engineering: A unified approach to manufacturing technology, production management, and industrial economics (2nd ed.). London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kaneko, T. (1975). Introduction to Markov decision processes. Maki-shoten. (In Japanese).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Research Institute for EngineeringKanagawa UniversityYokohamaJapan
  2. 2.The University of Electro-CommunicationsTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations