Advertisement

Simulation Training of Laparoscopy

  • Kazuhide MakiyamaEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Simulators are often used as educational tools for training surgeons in laparoscopic procedures. Some surgical simulators have been proven to shorten clinical learning curves, and it was demonstrated that techniques learnt by using a simulator can be brought into the operation room. Laparoscopic surgical simulators can be classified into box and virtual reality type. Box-type simulators are cheaper and have a superior array of surgical tools. By using box trainers, trainees are able to use and become familiar with real surgical tools. Box trainers are perfectly suited for learning suturing and knot tying. Virtual reality simulators are generally more expensive than box trainers. The main advantage of virtual reality simulators is that every movement of the forceps is recordable in virtual space. Thus, the recorded data can be analyzed, and trainees’ skills can be assessed objectively. Patient-specific simulators represent a new technological advancement. They provide patient-specific training, in which patients’ three-dimensional imaging data are used to create virtual reality simulations.

It is necessary to evaluate the usefulness and adequacy of laparoscopic simulators. There are several ways to validate laparoscopic simulators, including both subjective and objective methods. Subjective simulator evaluations assess face and content validity, whereas quantitative evaluations examine construct, concurrent, and predictive validity.

Keywords

Simulator Laparoscopy Training 

References

  1. Achurra P, Lagos A, Avila R, Tejos R, Buckel E, Alvarado J, Boza C, Jarufe N, Varas J. Allowing new opportunities in advanced laparoscopy training using a full high-definition training box. Surg Innov. 2017;24:66–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aggarwal R, Ward J, Balasundaram I, et al. Proving the effectiveness of virtual reality simulation for training in laparoscopic surgery. Ann Surg. 2007;246:771–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Araujo SE, Delaney CP, Seid VE, et al. Short-duration virtual reality simulation training positively impacts performance during laparoscopic colectomy in animal model: result of a single-blinded randomized trial: VR warm-up for laparoscopic colectomy. Surg Endosc. 2014;28:2574–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. de Araujo TB, Silveira FR, Souza DL, et al. Impact of video game genre on surgical skills development: a feasibility study. J Surg Res. 2016;201:235–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Aslam A, Nason GJ, Giri SK. Homemade laparoscopic surgical simulator: a cost-effective solution to the challenge of acquiring laparoscopic skills? Ir J Med Sci. 2016;185:791–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Badash I, Burtt K, Solorzano CA, Carey JN. Innovations in surgery simulation: a review of past, current and future techniques. Ann Transl Med. 2016;4:453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brewin J, Nedas T, Challacombe B, Elhage O, Keisu J, Dasqupta P. Face, content and construct validation of the first virtual reality laparoscopic nephrectomy simulator. BJU Int. 2010;106:850–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Calatayud D, Arora S, Aggarwal R, et al. Warm-up in a virtual reality environment improves performance in the operating room. Ann Surg. 2010;251:1181–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Da Cruz JA, Dos Reis ST, Cunha Frati RM, et al. Does warm-up training in a virtual reality simulator improve surgical performance? A prospective randomized analysis. J Surg Educ. 2016;73:974–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Endo K, Sata N, Ishiguro Y, et al. A patient-specific surgical simulator using preoperative imaging data: an interactive simulator using a three-dimensional tactile mouse. J Comput Surg. 2014;1:1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fried GM, Derossis AM, Bothwell J, et al. Comparison of laparoscopic performance in vivo with performance measured in a laparoscopic simulator. Surg Endosc. 1999;13:1077–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gava DM. The future vision of simulation in health care. Qual Saf Health Care. 2004;13(Suppl 1):i2–i10.Google Scholar
  13. Grantcharov TP, Bardram L, Funch-Jensen P, Rosenberg J. Impact of hand dominance, gender, and experience with computer games on performance in virtual reality laparoscopy. Surg Endosc. 2003;17:1082–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Grantcharov TP, Kristiansen VB, Bendix J, et al. Randomized clinical trial of virtual reality simulation for laparoscopic skills training. Br J Surg. 2004;91:146–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Haluck RS, Gallagher AG, Satava RM, et al. Reliability and validity of Endotower, a virtual reality trainer for angled endoscope navigation. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2002;85:179–84.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Hamilton EC, Scott DJ, Fleming JB, et al. Comparison of video trainer and virtual reality training systems on acquisition of laparoscopic skills. Surg Endosc. 2002;16:406–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Haque S, Srinivasan S. A meta-analysis of the training effectiveness of virtual reality surgical simulators. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed. 2006;10:51–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ieiri S, Ishii H, Souzaki R, Uemura M, Tomikawa M, Matsuoka N, Takahashi A, Hashizume M, Taguchi T. Development of an objective endoscopic surgical skill assessment system for pediatric surgeons: suture ligature model of the crura of the diaphragm in infant fundoplication. Pediatr Surg Int. 2013;5:501–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jalink MB, Goris J, Heineman E, Pierie JP, ten Cate Hoedemaker HO. Face validity of a Wii U video game for training basic laparoscopic skills. Am J Surg. 2015;209:1102–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Korndorffer JR Jr, Stefanidis D, Scott DJ. Laparoscopic skills laboratories: current assessment and a call for resident training standards. Am J Surg. 2006;191:17–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Le CQ, Lightner DJ, Vanderlei L, et al. The current role of medical simulation in American urological residency training programs: an assessment by program directors. J Urol. 2007;177:288–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lee JY, Mucksavage P, Kerbl DC, et al. Laparoscopic warm-up exercises improve performance of senior-level trainees during laparoscopic renal surgery. J Endourol. 2012;26:545–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Li MM, George J. A systematic review of low-cost laparoscopic simulators. Surg Endosc. 2017;31:38–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Madan AK, Franzides CT, Shervin N, et al. Assessment of individual hand performance in box trainers compared to virtual reality trainers. Am Surg. 2003;69:1112–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Makiyama K, Nagasaka M, Inuiya T, Takanami K, Ogata M, Kubota Y. Development of a patient-specific simulator for laparoscopic renal surgery. Int J Urol. 2012a;19:829–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Makiyama K, Sakata R, Yamanaka H, Tatenuma T, Sano F, Kubota Y. Laparoscopic nephroureterectomy in renal pelvic urothelial carcinoma with situs inversus totalis: preoperative training using a patient-specific simulator. Urology. 2012b;80:1375–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Makiyama K, Yamanaka H, Ueno D, Ohsaka K, Sano F, Nakaigawa N, Yao M, Kubota Y. Validation of a patient-specific simulator for laparoscopic renal surgery. Int J Urol. 2015;22:572–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Moldovanu R, Tarcoveanu E, Dimofte G, et al. Preoperative warm-up using a virtual reality simulator. JSLS. 2011;15:533–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Nomura T, Miyashita M, Shrestha S, et al. Can interview prior to laparoscopic simulator training predict a trainee’s skills? J Surg Educ. 2008;65:335–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Palter VN, Grantcharov TP. Individualized deliberate practice on a virtual reality simulator improves technical performance of surgical novices in the operating room: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2014;259:443–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Paschold M, Huber T, Kauff DW, et al. Preconditioning in laparoscopic surgery – results of a virtual reality pilot study. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2014;399:889–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Polterauer S, Husslein H, Kranawetter M, et al. Effect of preoperative warm-up exercise before laparoscopic gynecological surgery: A randomized trial. J Surg Educ. 2016;73:429–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ritter EM, Kindelan TW, Micheal C, et al. Concurrent validity of augmented reality metrics applied to the Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS). Surg Endosc. 2007;21:1441–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ruparel RK, Brahmbhatt RD, Dove JC, Hutchinson RC, Stauffer JA, Bowers SP, Richie E, Lannen AM, Thiel DD. “iTrainers”—novel and inexpensive alternatives to traditional laparoscopic box trainers. Urology. 2014;83:116–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Seymour NE, Gallagher AG, Roman SA, et al. Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized, double-blinded study. Ann Surg. 2002;236:458–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Shane MD, Pettitt BJ, Morgenthal CB, et al. Should surgical novices trade their retractors for joysticks? Videogame experience decreases the time needed to acquire surgical skills. Surg Endosc. 2007;22:1294–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Soler L, Marescaux J. Patient-specific surgical simulation. World J Surg. 2008;32:208–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sroka G, Feldman LS, Vassiliou MC, Kaneva PA, Fayez R, Fried GM. Fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery simulator training to proficiency improves laparoscopic performance in the operating room-a randomized controlled trial. Am J Surg. 2010;199:115–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Suzuki S, Eto K, Hattori A, Yanaga K, Suzuki N. Surgery simulation using patient-specific models for laparoscopic colectomy. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2007;125:464–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Thijssen AS, Schijven MP. Contenporary virtual reality laparoscopy simulators: quicksand or solid grounds for assessing surgical trainees? Am J Surg. 2010;199:529–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Van Hove C, Perry KA, Spight DH, Wheeler-Mcinvaille K, Diggs BS, Sheppard BC, Jobe BA, O’Rourke RW. Predictors of technical skill acquisition among resident trainees in a laparoscopic skills education program. World J Surg. 2008;32:1917–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wanzel KR, Ward M, Reznick RK. Teaching the surgical craft: from selection to certification. Curr Probl Surg. 2002;39:573–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wijn RP, Persoon MC, Schout BM, Martens EJ, Scherpbier AJ, Hendrikx AJ. Virtual reality laparoscopic nephrectomy simulator is lacking in construct validity. J Endourol. 2010;24:117–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Willaert WI, Aggarwal R, Daruwalla F, et al. Simulated procedure rehearsal is more effective than a preoperative generic warm-up for endovascular procedures. Ann Surg. 2012a;255:1184–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Willaert WI, Aggarwal R, Van Herzeele I, Cheshire NJ, Vermassen FE. Recent advancements in medical simulation: patient-specific virtual reality simulation. World J Surg. 2012b;36:1703–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of UrologyYokohama City University Graduate School of MedicineYokohamaJapan

Personalised recommendations