Advertisement

Endoscopic Management of Renal Stone: Retrograde, Antegrade, and Combined Approaches

  • Sung Yong Cho
  • Woo Jin Bang
  • Hyung Joon Kim
Chapter

Abstract

Owing to its technical development, tailored management for renal stones has become available to reduce mortality rates and increase surgical outcomes. In the era of flexible ureteroscopic surgery and miniaturized nephroscopy, urologists have embraced expanded minimally invasive options for managing and collecting symptomatic renal stones. The renal and ureteral surgery can be classified into three categories of retrograde, antegrade, and bidirectional approaches to target lesions. In cases that are expected to be difficult with the percutaneous or retrograde approach, a bidirectional approach can be considered according to the status of the targeted lesions.

Keywords

Urolithiasis Urinary calculi Nephrolithotomy Percutaneous Ureteroscopy Minimally invasive surgical procedures 

Notes

Remark

Permission is obtained to show the human images in this article according to local regulation.

References

  1. Addla SK, Rajpal S, Sutcliffe N, et al. A simple aid to improve patient positioning during percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2008;90:433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bach C, Goyal A, Kumar P, et al. The Barts ‘flank-free’ modified supine position for percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urol Int. 2012;89:365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brehmer B, Moll C, Makris A, et al. Endosew: new device for laparoscopic running sutures. J Endourol. 2008;22:307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fernstrom I, Johansson B. Percutaneous pyelolithotomy. A new extraction technique. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 1976;10:257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Grasso M, Nord R, Bagley DH. Prone split leg and flank roll positioning: simultaneous antegrade and retrograde access to the upper urinary tract. J Endourol. 1993;7:307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Jangid DK, Sharma G, Yadav SS, et al. A comparative study of antegrade air pyelogram and retrograde air pyelogram for initial puncture access during percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017;11:PC01.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Lehman T, Bagley DH. Reverse lithotomy: modified prone position for simultaneous nephroscopic and ureteroscopic procedures in women. Urology. 1988;32:529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Papatsoris A, Masood J, El-Husseiny T, et al. Improving patient positioning to reduce complications in prone percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol. 2009;23:831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ray AA, Chung DG, Honey RJ. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the prone and prone-flexed positions: anatomic considerations. J Endourol. 2009;23:1607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Scoffone CM, Cracco CM, Cossu M, et al. Endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery in Galdakao-modified supine Valdivia position: a new standard for percutaneous nephrolithotomy? Eur Urol. 2008;54:1393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Turner CD, Anderson J, Gerber GS. Improved patient positioning for percutaneous nephroscopic procedures using a surgical saddle. J Urol. 2000;163:199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sung Yong Cho
    • 1
    • 2
  • Woo Jin Bang
    • 3
  • Hyung Joon Kim
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of UrologySMG-SNU Boramae Medical CenterSeoulSouth Korea
  2. 2.Department of UrologySeoul National University HospitalSeoulSouth Korea
  3. 3.Department of UrologyHallym University Sacred Heart HospitalAnyang-SiSouth Korea
  4. 4.Department of UrologyKonyang University HospitalDaejeonSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations