Sven Libaek and “Misty Canyon”

  • Sophia MaalsenEmail author


This chapter develops the notion of distributed personhood using Sven Libaek’s “Misty Canyon” as an example. I demonstrate how a sound accumulates multiple biographies and forges associations with a network of human agents. In this particular example, it is possible to recognise how the strength of the connection to its original creator maintains an acknowledgement of Libaek through the various guises it assumes throughout its life—whether these are its use as a sample, its selection on a beat compilation, or as a reissue. This strength of connection plays out in questions surrounding ownership.

The chapter also develops the concept of distributed personhood and the multibiographical sound object as outlined in the previous chapter. The emergence of a musical cyborg—part object and part human—begins to take form. This human/nonhuman/subject/object binary represents a challenge to the restricted version of personhood provided by the possessive individual, on which copyright law is based, and further destabilises this foundational construct through demonstrating the tension that is present between them.


  1. Bogard, W. (2000). Smoothing machines and the constitution of society. Cultural Studies, 14(2), 269–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Buchli, V. (2004). Material culture: Current problems. In L. Meskell & R. Preucel (Eds.), A companion to social archaeology (pp. 179–194). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  3. Chang, V. (2009). Records that play: The present past in sampling practice. Popular Music, 28, 143–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Forman, M. (2002). The ‘hood comes first: Race, space, and place in rap and hip-hop (Music/Culture). Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Gorbman, C. (1980). Narrative film music. Yale French Studies, 60, 183–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gorbman, C. (2003). Why music? The sound film and its spectator. In K. Dickinson (Ed.), Movie music, the film reader (pp. 37–47). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Gosden, C. (2004). The past and foreign countries: Colonial and post-colonial archaeology and anthropology. In L. Meskell & R. Preucel (Eds.), A companion to social archaeology (pp. 161–178). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  8. Gregory, C. A. (1982). Gifts and commodities (Studies in Political Economy). London and New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  9. Haraway, D. (1991). Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Mauss, M. (1967). The gift. New York: Norton Library.Google Scholar
  11. Munn, N. D. (1992). The fame of Gawa: A symbolic study of value transformation in a Massim (Papua New Guinea) society. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Prendergast, R. M. (1977). A neglected art: A critical study of music in films. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Smith, J. (2003). Banking on film music: Structural interactions of the film. In K. Dickinson (Ed.), Movie music, the film reader (pp. 63–81). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Strathern, M. (1988). The gender of the gift. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  15. Strathern, M. (2006). Divided origins and the arithmetic of ownership. In B. Maurer & G. Schwab (Eds.), Accelerating possession: Global futures of property and personhood (pp. 134–173). New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Théberge, P. (1997). Any sound you can imagine: Making music/consuming technology. Hanover, NH: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Architecture, Design and PlanningUniversity of SydneyCamperdownAustralia

Personalised recommendations