Advertisement

How Do Agglomeration Economies Contribute to Firm Survival in China?

  • Canfei He
  • Shengjun Zhu
Chapter
Part of the Economic Geography book series (ECOGEO)

Abstract

New firms are often seen as the catalyst of innovation and employment growth and are acknowledged for their role in promoting regional competitiveness. Yet new firms face a number of factors, or liabilities, including a lack of sufficient resources, higher vulnerability to external shocks, and greater likelihood to operate farther from the industry’s minimum efficient scale leading to cost disadvantages (Schutjens and Wever 2000). Due to such liabilities, less than half of all new start-ups are expected to survive more than 5 years after entry, regardless of country contexts (Cefis and Marsili 2011). Since their premature exit results in a loss of economic growth opportunities, understanding the factors that influence the survival chances of new firms is essential to promoting a vibrant economy.

References

  1. Acs, Z. J., Armington, C., & Zhang, T. (2007). The determinants of new-firm survival across regional economies: The role of human capital stock and knowledge spillover. Papers in Regional Science, 86, 367–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Au, C., & Henderson, V. (2006). Are Chinese cities too small? Review of Economic Studies, 73(3), 549–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Audretsch, D. (1991). New-firm survival and the technical regime. Review of Economics and Statistics, 73(3), 441–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Audretsch, D. B., & Lehmann, E. E. (2005). Does the knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship hold for regions? Research Policy, 34(8), 1191–1202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boschma, R., & Iammarino, S. (2009). Related variety, trade linkages, and regional growth in Italy. Economic Geography, 85(3), 289–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boschma, R., & Wenting, R. (2007). The spatial evolution of the British automobile industry: Does location matter? Industrial and Corporate Change, 16(2), 213–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boschma, R., Minondo, A., & Navarro, M. (2012). Related variety and regional growth in Spain. Papers in Regional Science, 91(2), 241–256.Google Scholar
  8. Cefis, E., & Marsili, O. (2011). Born to flip. Exit decisions of entrepreneurial firms in high-tech and low-tech industries. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 21(3), 473–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Delgado, M., Porter, M. E., & Stern, S. (2010). Clusters and entrepreneurship. Journal of Economic Geography, 10(10), 495–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dunne, T., Roberts, M. J., & Samuelson, L. (1989). The growth and failure of US manufacturing plants. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 104(4), 671–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Essletzbichler, J. (2013). Relatedness, industrial branching and technological cohesion in US metropolitan areas. Regional Studies, 49(5), 752–766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Falck, O. (2007). Survival chances of new businesses: Do regional conditions matter? Applied Economics, 39(16), 2039–2048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fan, C. C., & Scott, A. J. (2003). Industrial agglomeration and development: A survey of spatial economic issues in East Asia and a statistical analysis of Chinese regions. Economic Geography, 79(3), 295–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Folta, T. B., Cooper, A. C., & Baik, Y. (2006). Geographic cluster size and firm performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 21(2), 217–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fotopoulos, G., & Louri, H. (2000). Location and survival of new entry. Small Business Economics, 14(4), 311–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Frenken, K., Van Oort, F., & Verburg, T. (2007). Related variety, unrelated variety and regional economic growth. Regional Studies, 41(5), 685–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Frenken, K., Cefis, E., & Stam, E. (2015). Industrial dynamics and clusters: A survey. Regional Studies, 49(1), 10–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fritsch, M., Brixy, U., & Falck, O. (2006). The effect of industry, region, and time on new business survival: A multi-dimensional analysis. Review of Industrial Organization, 28(3), 285–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Glaeser, E., Kallal, H., Scheinkman, J., & Shleifer, A. (1992). Growth in cities. Journal of Political Economy, 100, 1126–1152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. He, C., & Yang, R. (2016). Determinants of firm failure: Empirical evidence from China. Growth and Change, 47(1), 72–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Howell, A. (2015). ‘Indigenous’ innovation with heterogeneous risk and new firm survival in a transitioning Chinese economy. Research Policy, 44(1), 1866–1876.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Howell, A. (2016). Firm R&D, Innovation and easing financial constraints in China: Does corporate tax reform matter? Research Policy, 45(10), 1996–2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Howell, A., He, C., Rudai, Y., & Fan, C. (2016). Technological relatedness and asymmetrical firm productivity gains under market reforms in China, Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 9(3).  https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsw024
  24. Hu, C., Xu, Z., & Yashiro, N. (2015). Agglomeration and productivity in China: Firm level evidence. China Economic Review, 33, 50–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jacobs, J. (1969). The economy of cities. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  26. Los, B. (2000). The empirical performance of a new interindustry technology spillover measure. In P. Saviotti, B. Noote-boom, & E. Elgar (Eds.), Technology and knowledge: From the firm to innovation systems. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  27. Marshall, A. (1890). Principles of economics. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  28. Mundlak, Y. (1978). On the pooling of time series and cross-section data. Econometrica, 46(1), 69–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Neffke, F., Henning, M., & Boschma, R. (2011). How do regions diversify over time? Industry relatedness and the development of new growth paths in regions. Economic Geography, 87(3), 237–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Olley, G. S., & Pakes, A. (1996). The dynamics of productivity in the telecommunication equipment industry. Econometrica, 64(6), 1263–1297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Renski, H. (2011). External economies of localization, urbanization and industrial diversity and new firm survival. Papers in Regional Science, 90(3), 473–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Schutjens, V. A., & Wever, E. (2000). Determinants of new firm success. Papers in Regional Science, 79(2), 135–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Staber, U. (2001). Spatial proximity and firm survival in a declining industrial district: The case of knitwear firms in Baden-Wurttemberg. Regional Studies, 35(4), 329–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Stam, E. (2007). Why butterflies don’t leave: Locational behavior of entrepreneurial firms. Economic Geography, 83(1), 27–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Stuart, T., & Sorenson, O. (2003). The geography of opportunity: Spatial heterogeneity in founding rates and the performance of biotechnology firms. Research Policy, 32(3), 229–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tallman, S., Jenkins, M., Henry, N., & Pinch, S. (2004). Knowledge, clusters, and competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 29(2), 258–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wooldridge, J. (1995). Selection corrections for panel data models under conditional mean independence assumptions. Journal of Econometrics, 68(1), 115–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Canfei He
    • 1
  • Shengjun Zhu
    • 1
  1. 1.College of Urban and Environmental SciencesPeking UniversityBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations