Advertisement

Constructed Wetlands: A Clean-Green Technology for Degradation and Detoxification of Industrial Wastewaters

  • Sardar Khan
  • Javed Nawab
  • Muhammad Waqas
Chapter

Abstract

Constructed wetlands (CWs) have played a significant role in the purification and treatment of domestic, mining, agricultural, and industrial wastewater in the last few decades. CWs are designed and constructed on engineered systems to develop the natural processes involving wetland soils, flora, and their related microbial accumulations to support wastewater treatment. The CWs, therefore, present environmentally friendly, cost-effective, and favorable substitute for industrial wastewater treatment. Several techniques have been used in the removal of contaminants from CWs such as filtration, sedimentation, adsorption, volatilization, phyto-accumulation, and microbial activity. In the past, CWs have played efficient role in the removal of toxic metals, hydrocarbons, pharmaceuticals, and dyes from wastewater. However, the efficiency mainly depends on initial concentrations of contaminants, plant types, plant microbes’ interactions, climatic condition and flow rate of wastewater etc. The overall conclusion of this book chapter will contribute to the development of phyto-technology for industrial wastewater and other associated industrial problems.

Keywords

Constructed wetlands Phyto-technology Wastewaters Contaminants Toxicity 

Notes

Acknowledgment

The authors of this chapter are tremendously grateful to the Higher Education Commission, Islamabad, University of Peshawar and National Center of Excellence in Geology, University of Peshawar for financial support.

References

  1. Admire JD, De Albuquerque JS, Cruze JA, Piontek KR, Sale TC (1995) Case study: natural attenuation of dissolved hydrocarbons at a former gas plant. Paper SPE 29755 presented in SPE/EPA exploration and production environmental conference held 27–29 March in Houston, TexasGoogle Scholar
  2. Aksoy A, Demirezen D, Duman F (2005) Bioaccumulation, detection and analyses of heavy metal pollution in Sultan Marsh and its environment. Water Air Soil Pollut 164:241–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alloway BJ (1995) Heavy metals in soils, 2n edn. Chapman and Hall, London, p 368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arias C, Brix H (2003) Humedales artificiales para el tratamiento de aguas residuales. Cienc Ing Neogranad 13:17–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Atlas RM, Cerniglia CE (1995) Bioremediation of petroleum pollutants: diversity and environmental aspects of hydrocarbon biodegradation. Bioscience 45:332–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Alexander M (1999) Biodegradation and bioremediation, 2nd edn. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Baris AJ, Eifert WH, Klotzer K, McGuckin CJ (2001) Use of a subsurface flow constructed wetland for collection and treatment of water containing BTEX. Roux Associates, InslandiaGoogle Scholar
  8. Beining BA, Otte ML (1996) Retention of metals originating from an abandoned lead-zinc mine by a wetland at Glendalough, Co. Wicklow. Biol Environ 96:117–126Google Scholar
  9. Beining BA, Otte ML (1997) Retention of metals and longevity of a wetland receiving mine leachate. In: Proceedings of 1997 National meeting of the American Society for surface mining and reclamation, Austin, Texas, vol. 10, issue 16, pp 43–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Beisner BE, Peres-Neto PR, Lindström ES, Barnett A, Lorena Longhi M (2006) The role of environmental and spatial processes in structuring lake communities from bacteria to fish. Ecology 87:2985–2991CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bell T, Newman JA, Silverman BW, Turner SL, Lilley AK (2005) The contribution of species richness and composition to bacterial services. Nature 436:1157–1160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bharagava RN, Saxena G, Chowdhary P (2017a) Constructed wetlands: an emerging phytotechnology for degradation and detoxification of industrial wastewaters. In: Bharagava RN (ed) Environmental pollutants and their bioremediation approaches, 1st edn. CRC Press/Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton, pp 397–426.  https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315173351-15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bharagava RN, Chowdhary P, Saxena G (2017b) Bioremediation: an ecosustainable green technology: its applications and limitations. In: Bharagava RN (ed) Environmental pollutants and their bioremediation approaches, 1st edn. CRC Press/Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton, pp 1–22.  https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315173351-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bharagava RN, Saxena G, Mulla SI, Patel DK (2017c) Characterization and identification of recalcitrant organic pollutants (ROPs) in tannery wastewater and its phytotoxicity evaluation for environmental safety. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00244-017-0490-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bond DR, Lovley DR (2003) Electricity production by Geobacter sulfurreducens attached to electrodes. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:1548–1555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Boxall ABA, Blackwell P, Cavallo R, Kay P, Tolls J (2002) The sorption and transport of a sulphonamide antibiotic in soil systems. Toxicol Lett 131:19–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bremer C, Braker G, Matthies D, Reuter A, Engels C, Conrad R (2007) Impact of plant functional group, plant species, and sampling time on the composition of nirK-type denitrifier communities in soil. Appl Environ Microbiol 73:6876–6884.  https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01536-07CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Breitholtz M, Näslund M, Stråe D, Borg H, Grabic R, Fick J (2012) An evaluation of free water surface wetlands as tertiary sewage treatment of micro-pollutants. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 78:63–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Brix H (1997) Do macrophytes play a role in constructed treatment wetlands? Water Sci Technol 35(5):11–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Bunluesin S, Kruatrachue M, Pokethitiyook P, Upatham S, Lanza GR (2007) Batch and continuous packed column studies of cadmium biosorption by Hydrilla verticillata biomass. J Biosci Bioeng 103:509–513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Burland SM, Edwards EA (1999) Anaerobic benzene biodegradation linked to nitrate reduction. Appl Environ Microbiol 65(2):529–533Google Scholar
  22. Coates J, Chakraborty R, Lack J, O’Connor S, Cole K, Bender K, Achenbach L (2001) Anaerobic benzene oxidation coupled to nitrate reduction in pure culture by two strains of dechloromonas. Nature 411(6841):1039–1043.  https://doi.org/10.1038/35082545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Camacho-Munoz D, Martin J, Santos JL, Aparicio I, Alonso E (2012) Effectiveness of conventional and low-cost wastewater treatments in the removal of pharmaceutically active compounds. Water Air Soil Pollut 223(5):2611–2621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Caswell PC, Gelb D, Marinello SA, Emerick JC, Cohen RR (1992) Evaluation of constructed surface-flow wetlands systems for the treatment of discharged waters from oil and gas operations in Wyoming. In: SPE Rocky Mountain regional conference. Paper SPE 24331, Casper, WyomingGoogle Scholar
  25. Chandra R, Saxena G, Kumar V (2015) Phytoremediation of environmental pollutants: an eco-sustainable green technology to environmental management. In: Chandra R (ed) Advances in biodegradation and bioremediation of industrial waste, 1st edn. CRC Press/Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton, pp 1–30.  https://doi.org/10.1201/b18218-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Chaudhry Q, Blom-Zandstra M, Gupta S, Joner EJ (2005) Utilising the synergy between plants and rhizosphere microorganisms to enhance breakdown of organic pollutants in the environment. Environ Sci Pollut Res 12:34–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Cheng SP, Grosse W, Karrenbrock F, Thoennessen M (2002) Efficiency of constructed wetlands in decontamination of water polluted by heavy metals. Ecol Eng 18:317–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Coates JD, Chakraborty R, McInerney MJ (2002) Anaerobic benzene biodegradation – a new era. Res Microbiol 153(10):621–628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Conkle JL, Gan J, Anderson MA (2012) Degradation and sorption of commonly detected PPCPs in wetland sediments under aerobic and anaerobic conditions. J Soils Sediments 12(7):1164–1173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Dagley S (1986) Biochemistry of aromatic hydrocarbon degradation in Pseudomonas. In: Sokatch J, Ornston LN (eds) The Bacteria, The biology of Pseudomonas, vol 10. Academic Press, Orlando, pp 527–555Google Scholar
  31. Dahllöf I (2002) Molecular community analysis of microbial diversity. Curr Opin Biotechnol 13:213–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Daniels R (2001) Enter the root-zone: green technology for the leather manufacturer, part 3. World Leather 14(6):85–88Google Scholar
  33. De Sousa JT, van Haandel A, Lima EPC, Guimarães AVA (2003) Performance of constructed wetland systems treating anaerobic effluents. Water Sci Technol 48(6):295–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Demirezen D, Aksoy A, Uruc K (2007) Effect of population density on growth, biomass and nickel accumulation capacity of Lemna gibba (Lemnaceae). Chemosphere 66:553–557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Descousse A, Monig K, Voldum K (2004) Evaluation study of various produced- water treatment technologies to remove dissolved aromatic components. In: Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE) annual technical conference and exhibition held 26–29 September 2004, in Houston, Texas. Paper SPE 90103 2004. (Available on http://www.spe.org/elibrary)
  36. Diaz E (2004) Bacterial degradation of aromatic pollutants: a paradigm of metabolic versatility. Int Microbiol 7(3):173–180Google Scholar
  37. Dordio A, Carvalho AJP, TeixeiraDM DCB, Pinto AP (2010) Removal of pharmaceuticals in microcosm constructed wetlands using Typha spp. and LECA. Bioresour Technol 101(3):886–892CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Dorman L, Castle JW, Rodgers JH (2009) Performance of a pilot-scale constructed wetland system for treating simulated ash basin water. Chemosphere 75:939–947CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Environmental Protection Agency (2013) Particulate and turbidity removal technologies. United States Environmental Protection Agency. N.p., 16 Jan 2013. Web. 7 May 2014. http://www.epa.gov/nrmrl/wswrd/dw/smallsystems/ptr.html
  40. Fleischer S, Gustafson A, Joelsson A, Pansar J, Stibe L (1994) Nitrogen removal in created ponds. Ambio 23:349–357Google Scholar
  41. Gambrell RP (1994) Trace and toxic metals in wetlands e a review. J Environ Qual 23:883–889CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Garcia C, Moreno DA, Ballester A, Blazquez ML, Gonzalez F (2001) Bioremediation of an industrial acid mine water by metal-tolerant sulphate-reducing bacteria. Miner Eng 14:997–1008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Gautam S, Kaithwas G, Bharagava RN, Saxena G (2017) Pollutants in tannery wastewater, pharmacological effects and bioremediation approaches for human health protection and environmental safety. In: Bharagava RN (ed) Environmental pollutants and their bioremediation approaches, 1st edn. CRC Press/Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton, pp 369–396.  https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315173351-14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Gilbert N (2012) Drug-pollution law all washed up. Nature Int Wkly J Sci 491:503–504. Web. 8 May. 2014. http://www.nature.com/news/drug-pollution-law-all-washed-up-1.11854CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Goulet RR, Pick FR (2001) The effects of cattails (Typha latifolia L.) on concentrations and partitioning of metals in surficial sediments of surface-flow constructed wetlands. Water Air Soil Pollut 132:275–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Goutam SP, Saxena G, Singh V, Yadav AK, Bharagava RN (2018) Green synthesis of TiO2 nanoparticles using leaf extract of Jatropha curcas L. for photocatalytic degradation of tannery wastewater. Chem Eng J 336:386–396.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2017.12.029CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Goyal S, Sharma G, Bhardwaj KK (2009) Decolorization of synthetic dye (methyl red) waste water using constructed wetlands having upflow and downflow loading formate. Rasayan J Chem 2(2):329–331Google Scholar
  48. Greenway M, Bolton KGE (1996) From wastes to resources – turning over a new leaf: Melaleuca trees for wastewater treatment. Environ Res Forum 5–6:363–366Google Scholar
  49. Hawkins WB, Rodgers JH, Gillespie WB, Dunn AW, Dorn PB, Cano ML (1997) Design and construction of wetlands for aqueous transfers and transformations of selected metals. Ecotox Environ Safe 36:238–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Hallin S, Lindgren P-E (1999) PCR detection of genes encoding nitrite reductase in denitrifying bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 65:1652–1657Google Scholar
  51. Hannig J, Iyer HK, Patterson P (2006) Fiducial generalized confidence intervals. J Am Stat Assoc 101:254–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Hiegel T (2004) Analysis of pilot scale constructed wetland treatment of petroleum contaminated groundwater. MSc thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, University of WyomingGoogle Scholar
  53. Hijosa-Valsero M, Matamoros V, Sidrach-Cardona R, Martin-Villacorta J, Becares E, Bayona JM (2010) Comprehensive assessment of the design configuration of constructed wetlands for the removal of pharmaceuticals and personal care products from urban wastewaters. Water Res 4(12):3669–3678CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Hoagland RE, Williams RD (1985) The influence of secondary plant compounds on the associations of soil microorganisms and plant roots. In: Thompson AC (ed) The Chemistry of allelopathy: biochemical interactions among plants. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, pp 301–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Holmstrom, H (2000) Geochemical processes in sulphidic mine tailings: field and laboratory studies performed in northern Sweden at the Laver, Stekenjokk and Kristineberg mine sites. PhD dissertation 2000:03. Lulea University of Technology, Lulea, SwedenGoogle Scholar
  56. Horne AJP (2000) Phytoremediation by constructed wetlands. In: Raskin I, Ensley BD (eds) Phytoremediation of toxic metals: using plants to clean up the environment. Wiley, New York, pp 13–39Google Scholar
  57. Horner-Devine CM, Leibold MA, Smith VH, Bohannan BJM (2003) Bacterial diversity patterns along a gradient of primary productivity. Ecol Lett 6:613–622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Hussain SA, Prasher SO (2011) Understanding the sorption of ionophoric pharmaceuticals in a treatment wetland. Wetlands 31(3):63–571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Ilker U, Duan YP, Ogram A (2000) Characterization of the naphthalene-degrading bacterium, Rhodococcus opacus M213. FEMS Microbiol Lett 185(2):231–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. International Association of Oil and Gas Producers (2002) Aromatics in produced water: occurrence, fate and effects, and treatment. Report no. 1.20/324 (January 2002). International Association of Oil and Gas Producers, LondonGoogle Scholar
  61. ITRC (2003) Technical and regulatory guidance document for constructed treatment wetlands. The Interstate Technology and Regulatory Council Wetlands Team 128Google Scholar
  62. Janks JS, Cadena F (1991) Identification and properties of modified zeolites for the removal of Benzene, Toluene and Xylene from Aqueous solutions. Paper SPE 22833 presented in 1991 Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE) Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition held 6-9 October, Dallas, Texas, USAGoogle Scholar
  63. Jenssen PD, Maehlum T, Krogstad T (1993) Potential use of constructed wetlands for waste-water treatment in Northern environments. Water Sci Technol 28:149–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Ji GD, Sun TH, Ni JR (2007) Surface flow constructed wetland for heavy oil- produced water treatment. Bioresour Technol 98(2):436–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Jiang JQ, Zhou Z, Sharma VK (2013) Occurrence, transportation, monitoring and treatment of emerging micro-pollutants in waste water – a review from global views. Microchem J 110:292–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Jonsson J, Lovgren L (2006) Precipitation of secondary Fe(III) minerals from acid mine drainage. Appl Geochem 21:437–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Juwarker AS, Oke B, Patnaik SM (1995) Domestic wastewater treatment through constructed wetland in India. Water Sci Technol 32:291–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Kadlec RH, Knight RL (1996) Treatment wetlands. CRC Press, Inc, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  69. Kadlec RH, Knight RL, Vymazal J, Brix H, Cooper P, Haberl R (2000) Constructed wetlands for pollution control – processes, performance, design and operation. IWA Scientific and technical report no. 8. IWA Publishing, London, UKGoogle Scholar
  70. Kamal M, Ghaly AE, Mahmoud N, Cote R (2004) Phytoaccumulation of heavy metals by aquatic plants. Environ Int 29:1029–1039CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Khetan KS, Collins JT (2007) Human pharmaceuticals in the aquatic environment: a challenge to green chemistry. Chem Rev 107:2319–2364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Kivaisi AK (2001) The potential for constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment and reuse in developing countries – a review. Ecol Eng 16:545–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Klomjek P, Nitisoravut S (2005) Constructed treatment wetland: a study of eight plant species under saline conditions. Chemosphere 58:585–593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Knight RL, Kadlec RH, Ohlendorf HM (1999) The use of treatment wetlands for petroleum industry effluents. Environ Sci Technol 33(7):973–980CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Korkusuz EA (2005) Manual of practice on constructed wetland for wastewater treatment and reuse in Mediterranean Countries. report, MED-REUNET II Support Programme (EC Project No: INCO-CT-2003–502453), AGBAR FoundationGoogle Scholar
  76. Kotyza J, Soudek P, Kafka Z, Vanek T (2010) Phytoremediation of pharmaceuticals – preliminary study. Int J Phytoremediation 12(3):306–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Kummerer K (2009) Antibiotics in the aquatic environment -a review–part II. Chemosphere 75:435–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Lahvis MA, Baehr AL, Baker RJ (1999) Quantification of aerobic biodegradation and volatilization rates of gasoline hydrocarbons near the water table under natural attenuation conditions. Water Resour Res 35(3):753–765CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Langenheder S, Prosser JI (2008) Resource availability influences the diversity of a functional group of heterotrophic soil bacteria. Environ Microbiol 10:2245–2256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Lee BH, Scholz M (2007) What is the role of Phragmites australis in experimental constructed wetland filters treating urban runoff? Ecol Eng 29:87–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Lefebvre O, Moletta R (2006) Treatment of organic pollution in industrial saline wastewater: a literature review. Water Res 40:3671–3682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Lemanceau P, Bauer P, Kraemer S, Briat JF (2009) Iron dynamics in the rhizosphere as a case study for analyzing interactions between soils, plants and microbes. Plant Soil 321:513–535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Lesage E, Rousseau DPL, Meers E, Tack FMG, De Pauw N (2007) Accumulation of metals in a horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetland treating domestic wastewater in Flanders, Belgium. Sci Total Environ 380:102–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Leyval C, Joner EJ, del Val C, Haselwandter K (2002) Potential of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi for bioremediation. In: Gianinazzi S, Schuepp H, Barea JM, Haselwandter K (eds) Mycorrhizal technology in agriculture. Birkhauser-Verlag, Basel, pp 175–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Li Y, Zhu G, Ng WJ, Tan SK (2014) A review on removing pharmaceutical contaminants from wastewater by constructed wetlands: design, performance and mechanism. Sci Total Environ 468–469:908–932CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Maine MA, Sune N, Hadad H, Sanchez G, Bonetto C (2006) Nutrient and metal removal in a constructed wetland for waste-water treatment from a metallurgic industry. Ecol Eng 26:341–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Manning BA, Fendorf SE, Goldberg S (1998) Surface structures and stability of arsenic(III) on goethite: spectroscopic evidence for inner-sphere complexes. Environ Sci Technol 32:2383–2388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Marchand L, Mench M, Jacob DL, Otte ML (2010) Metal and metalloid removal in constructed wetlands, with emphasis on the importance of plants and standardized measurements: a review. Environ Pollut 158:3447–3461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Martiny JBH, Bohannan BJM, Brown JH, Colwell RK, Fuhrman JA, Green JL et al (2006) Microbial biogeography: putting microorganisms on the map. Nature Rev 4:102–112Google Scholar
  90. Mastretta C, Taghavi S, van der Lelie D, Mengoni A, Galardi F, Gonnelli C, Barac T, Boulet J, Weyens N, Vangronsveld J (2009) Endophytic bacteria from seeds of Nicotiana tabacum can reduce cadmium phytotoxicity. Int J Phytoremediation 11:251–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Matagi SV (1998) Environmental Technology Assessment in Uganda. A country Synopsis. In: Environmental Technology Assessment (EnTA) in Sub-Saharan Africa, UNEP-IETC Report 3, Osaka/Shiga, pp 259–277Google Scholar
  92. Matagi SV, Swai D, Maine MA, Sune N, Hadad H, Sanchez G, Bonetto C (1998) Nutrient and metal removal in a constructed wetland for waste-water treatment from a metallurgic industry. Ecol Eng 26:341–347Google Scholar
  93. Matamoros V, Boyona JM (2006) Elimination of pharmaceuticals and personal care products in subsurface flow constructed wetlands. Environ Sci Technol 40(18):5811–5816CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Mbuligwe SE (2005) Comparative treatment of dye-rich wastewater in engineered wetland systems (EWSs) vegetated with different plants. Water Res 39:271–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Mishra VK, Tripathi BD (2008) Concurrent removal and accumulation of heavy metals by the three aquatic macrophytes. Bioresour Technol 99:7091–7097CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Mitchell DS (1976) The growth and management of Eichhornia crassipes and Salvinia spp. in their native environment and in alien situationGoogle Scholar
  97. Mitsch WJ, Gosselink JG (2007) Wetlands, 4th edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  98. Mitsch WJ, Jorgensen SE (2003) Ecological engineering: a field whose time has come. Ecol Eng 20(5):363–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Mitsch WJ, Tejada J, Nahlik A, Kohlmann B, Bernala B, Hernandez CE (2008) Tropical wetlands for climate change research, water quality management and conservation education on a university campus in Costa Rica. Ecol Eng 34(4):276–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Molinos-Senante M, Reif R, Garrido-Baserba M, Hernández-Sancho F, Omil F, Poch M et al (2013) Economic valuation of environmental benefits of removing pharmaceutical and personal care products from WWTP effluents by ozonation. Sci Total Environ 461–462:409–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Mueller JG, Resnick SM, Shelton ME, Pritchard PH (1992) Effect of inoculation on the biodegradation of weathered Prudhoe Bay crude oil. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 10(2):95–102Google Scholar
  102. Murray-Gulde CL, Huddleston GM, Garber KV, Rodgers JH (2005) Contributions of Schoenoplectus californicus in a constructed wetland system receiving copper contaminated wastewater. Water Air Soil Pollut 163:355–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Nilratnisakorn S, Thiravetyan P, Nakbanpote W (2009) A constructed wetland model for synthetic reactive dye wastewater treatment by narrow-leaved cattails (Typha angustifolia Linn). Water Sci Technol 60(6):1565–1574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Nyquist J, Greger M (2009) A field study of constructed wetlands for preventing and treating acid mine drainage. Ecol Eng 35(5):630–642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Olejnik D, Wojciechowski K (2012) The conception of constructed wetland for dyes removal in water solutions. Chemik 66(6):611–614Google Scholar
  106. Oliveira RS, Dodd JC, PML C (2001) The mycorrhizal status of Phragmites australis in several polluted soils and sediments of an industrialised region of Northern Portugal. Mycorrhiza 10:241–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Philippot L, Hallin S (2005) Finding the missing link between diversity and activity using denitrifying bacteria as a model functional community. Curr Opin Microbiol 8:234–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Reche I, Pulido-Villena E, Morales-Baquero R, Casamayor EO (2005) Does ecosystem size determine aquatic bacterial richness? Ecology 86:1715–1722CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Rehm HJ, Reed G (1999) Biotechnology: environmental processes I; waste water treatment. Wiley, WeinheimCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Rew S, Mulamoottil GA (1999) A cost comparison of leachate treatment alternatives. In: Mulamoottil G, McBean EA, Rovers F (eds) Constructed wetlands for the treatment of landfill leachates. Lewis, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  111. Rich JJ, Myrold DD (2004) Community composition and activities of denitrifying bacteria from adjacent agricultural soil, riparian soil, and creek sediment in Oregon, USA. Soil Biol Biochem 36:1431–1441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Ridgeway HF, Safarik J, Phipps D, Carl P, Clark D (1990) Identification and catabolic activity of well-derived gasoline-degrading bacteria and a contaminated aquifer. Appl Environ Microbiol 56(11):3565–3575Google Scholar
  113. Ryan PR, Delhaize E, Jones DL (2001) Function of mechanism of organic acid exudation from plant roots. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 52:527–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Sachin MK, Gaikwad RW, Misal SA (2010) Low cost sugarcane bagasse ash as an adsorbent for dye removal from dye effluent. Int J Chem Eng Appl 1(4):309–318Google Scholar
  115. Saxena G, Bharagava RN (2015) Persistent organic pollutants and bacterial communities present during the treatment of tannery wastewater. In: Chandra R (ed) Environmental waste management, 1st edn. CRC Press/Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton, pp 217–247.  https://doi.org/10.1201/b19243-10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Saxena G, Bharagava RN (2017) Organic and inorganic pollutants in industrial wastes, their ecotoxicological effects, health hazards and bioremediation approaches. In: Bharagava RN (ed) Environmental pollutants and their bioremediation approaches, 1st edn. CRC Press/Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton, pp 23–56.  https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315173351-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Saxena G, Chandra R, Bharagava RN (2016) Environmental pollution, toxicity profile and treatment approaches for tannery wastewater and its chemical pollutants. Rev Environ Contam Toxicol 240:31–69.  https://doi.org/10.1007/398_2015_5009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Saxena G, Purchase D, Mulla SI, Saratale GD, Bharagava RN (2019) Phytoremediation of heavy metal-contaminated sites: eco-environmental concerns, field studies, sustainability issues and future prospects. Rev Environ Contam Toxicol.  https://doi.org/10.1007/398_2019_24Google Scholar
  119. Schmitt H, Haapakangas H, van Beelen P (2005) Effects of antibiotics on soil microorganisms: time and nutrients influence pollution- induced community tolerance. Soil Biol Biochem 37:1882–1892CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Scholz M, Harrington R, Carroll P, Mustafa A (2007) The Integrated Constructed Wetlands (ICW) concept. Wetlands 27(2):337–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Seo DC, Yu K, DeLaune RD (2008) Comparison of monometal and multimetal adsorption in Mississippi River alluvial wetland sediment: batch and column experiments. Chemosphere 73:1757–1764CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Shade A, Jones SE, McMahon KD (2008) The influence of habitat heterogeneity on freshwater bacterial community composition and dynamics. Environ Microbiol 10:1057–1067CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Sheoran AS, Sheoran V (2006) Heavy metal removal mechanism of acid mine drainage in wetlands – a critical review. Miner Eng 19:105–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Song Z, Williams CJ, Edyvean RGJ (2000) Sedimentation of tannery wastewater. Water Res 34(7):2171–2176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Song B, Ward BB (2003) Nitrite reductase genes in halobenzoate degrading denitrifying bacteria. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 43:349–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Spence JM, Bottrell SH, Thornton SF, Richnow HH, Spence KH (2005) Hydrochemical and isotopic effects associated with petroleum fuel biodegradation pathways in a chalk aquifer. J Contam Hydrol 79(1–2):67–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. Stephenson MT (1992) A survey of produced water studies. In: Ray JP, Englehart FR (eds) Produced water. Plenum Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  128. Stoltz E, Greger M (2005) Effects of different wetland plant species on fresh unweathered sulphidic mine tailings. Plant Soil 276:251–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. Stottmeister U, Wiessner A, Kuschk P, Kappelmeyer U, Kastner M, Bederski O, Muller RA, Moormann H (2003) Effects of plants and microorganisms in constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment. Biotechnol Adv 22(3):93–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. Sugai SF, Lindstrom JE, Braddock JF (1997) Environmental influences on the microbial degradation of Exxon Valdez oil on the shorelines of Prince William Sound, Alaska. Environ Sci Technol 31(5):1564–1572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. Tatum CK (2015) A review on the use of constructed wetlands as secondary wastewater treatment for the removal of pharmaceuticals and personal care products. Master thesis, North CarolinaGoogle Scholar
  132. Trapp S, Karlson U (2001) Aspects of phyto remediation of organic pollutants. J Soils Sediments 1:37–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. Ulsido MD (2014) Performance evaluation of constructed wetlands: a review of arid and semi arid climatic region. Afr J Environ Sci Technol 8(2):99–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. UNEP (2004) Integrated watershed management- ecohydrology and phytotechnology manual. Online at: www.unep.or.jp/ietc/publications/freshwater/watershed_manual/index.asp
  135. USEPA (2000) Constructed wetlands treatment of municipal wastewater. United States (US) Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Office of Research and Development, Cincinnati, OH, USAGoogle Scholar
  136. Uslu MO, Jasim S, Arvai A, Bewtra J, Biswas N (2013) A survey of occurrence and risk assessment of pharmaceutical substances in the Great Lakes Basin. Ozone Sci Eng 35:249–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  137. Verlicchi P, Zambello E (2014) How efficient are constructed wetlands in removing pharmaceuticals from untreated and treated urban wastewaters? A review. Sci Total Environ 470–471:1281–1306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. Vymazal J, Brix H, Cooper PF, Green MB, Haberl R (1998) Constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment in Europe. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, p 366Google Scholar
  139. Vymazal J, Svehla J, Kropfelova L, Chrastny V (2007) Trace metals in Phragmites australis and Phalaris arundinacea growing in constructed and natural wetlands. Sci Total Environ 380:154–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  140. Walker DJ, Hurl S (2002) The reduction of heavy metals in a storm water wetland. Ecol Eng 18:407–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  141. Wallace SD (2001) Onsite remediation of petroleum contact wastes using subsurface flow wetlands. In: Proceedings of wetlands and remediation: the second international conference, 5–6 September 2001. Battelle Institute, Columbus, OhioGoogle Scholar
  142. Wallace SD, Knight RL (2006) Small-scale constructed treatment systems: feasibility, design criteria, and O&M requirements. Final report, Project 01-CTS-5. Water Environment Research Foundation, Alexandria, VirginiaGoogle Scholar
  143. Wallenstein MD, Myrold DD, Firestone M, Voytek M (2006) Environmental controls on denitrifying communities and denitrification rates: insights from molecular methods. Ecol Appl 16:2143–2152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  144. Weber KP, Gehder M, Legge RL (2008) Assessment of changes in the microbial community of constructed wetland mesocosms in response to acid mine drainage exposure. Water Res 42(1–2):180–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  145. Weisner SEB, Eriksson PG, Granéli W, Leonardsson L (1994) Influence of macrophytes on nitrate removal in wetlands. Ambio 23:363–366Google Scholar
  146. Wemple C, Hendricks L (2000) Documenting the recovery of hydrocarbon- impacted wetlands: a multi-disciplinary approach. In: Wetlands and remediation: an international conference, by Means JL and Hinchee RE. Battelle Press, Columbus, Ohio, USA, pp 73–78Google Scholar
  147. Wen Y, Su Li M, Qin WC, Fu L, He J, Zhao YH (2012) Linear and non-linear relationships between soil sorption and hydrophobicity: model, validation and influencing factors. Chemosphere 86(6):634–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  148. Wetzel RG (1993) Humic compounds from wetlands: complexation, inactivation, and reactivation of surfacebound and extracellular enzymes. Int Ver Theor Angew Limnol Verh 25:122–l 28Google Scholar
  149. Wetlands International – Malaysia Office (2013) The use of constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment. Selangor, Malaysia. Online at: http://www.wetlands.org/WatchRead/Currentpublications/tabid/56/ArticleType/ArticleView/ArticleID/1369/PageID/550/Default.aspx
  150. White JR, Belmont M, Metcalfe C (2006) Pharmaceutical compounds in wastewater: wetland treatment as a potential solution. Sci World J 6:1731–1736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  151. Yang Y, Fu J, Peng H, Hou L, Liu M, Zhou JL (2011) Occurrence and phase distribution of selected pharmaceuticals in the Yangtze Estuary and its coastal zone. J Hazard Mater 190:588–596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  152. Ye SH, Huang LC, Li YO, Ding M, Hu YY, Ding DW (2006) Investigation on bioremediation of oil-polluted wetland at Liaodong Bay in northeast China. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 71(4):543–548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  153. Zayed A, Growthaman S, Terry N (1998) Phytoaccumulation of trace elements by wetland plants. I Duckweed. J Environ Qual 27:715–721CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  154. Zhang L, Scholz M, Mustafa A, Harrington R (2008) Assessment of the nutrient removal performance in integrated constructed wetlands with the self-organizing map. Water Res 42(13):3519–3527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  155. Zhang H, Liu P, Feng Y, Yang F (2013) Fate of antibiotics during wastewater treatment and antibiotic distribution in the effluent-receiving waters of the Yellow Sea, northern China. Mar Pollut Bull 73:282–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  156. Zhang DQ, Gersberg RM, Ng WJ, Tan SK (2014) Removal of pharmaceuticals and personal care products in aquatic plant-based systems: a review. Environ Pollut 184:620–639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  157. Zhou E, Crawford RL (1995) Effects of oxygen, nitrogen, and temperature on gasoline biodegradation in soil. Biodegradation 6(2):127–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  158. Zhu S, Chen H (2014) The fate and risk of selected pharmaceutical and personal care products in wastewater treatment plants and a pilot-scale multistage constructed wetland system. Environ Sci Pollut Res 21(2):1466–1479CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sardar Khan
    • 1
  • Javed Nawab
    • 2
    • 3
  • Muhammad Waqas
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Environmental ScienceUniversity of PeshawarPeshawarPakistan
  2. 2.Department of Environmental SciencesAbdul Wali Khan UniversityMardanPakistan
  3. 3.Department of Environmental and Conservation SciencesUniversity of SwatMingoraPakistan

Personalised recommendations