Advertisement

A Measure for Modularity and Comparative Analysis of Modularity Metrics

  • Xian-fu ChengEmail author
  • Chong Wan
  • Hao-yang Qiu
  • Jun-yi Luo
Conference paper

Abstract

Modularity is an effect method to response to the demand for increasing variety in the market. Modular product consists of modules, aims at decomposing complex products into simplified components by dissociated interfaces. Quantifying the degree of modularity is central to the research on modular product design. In this paper, we surveyed the literature for modularity measures, and proposed a metric for modularity to maximize cohesion degree within the modules and minimize coupling degree between the modules. At the same, comparative analysis is made on modularity metrics addressed by some literatures and this paper. It is hoped that this research will provide an approach to analyze the relationship between the two modules, which will shape future research in the field of modular product family architecture.

Keywords

Metrics Modularity Modular product design 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 71462007 and 51765019).

References

  1. 1.
    R.B. Stone, K.L. Wood, Development of a functional basis for design. J. Mech. Des. 122(4), 359–370 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    C.R. Bryant, K.L. Sivaramakrishnan, M. Van Wie, R.B. Stone, D.A. McAdams, A modular design approach to support sustainable design, in ASME 2004 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference (IDETC/CIE2004), Salt Lake City, Utah, USA, 28 September–2 October, 2004Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    P. Gu, S. Sosale, Product modularization for life cycle engineering. Robot. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 15(5), 387–401 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    S. Yu, Q. Yang, J. Tao, X. Tian, F. Yin, Product modular design incorporating life cycle issues—group genetic algorithm (GGA) based method. J. Clean. Prod. 19(9), 1016–1032 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    K. Höltt-Otto, N.A. Chiriac, D. Lysy et al. Comparative analysis of coupling modularity metrics. J. Eng. Des. 23(10–11), 790–806 (2012)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    T. Algeddawy, H. Elmaraghy, Optimum granularity level of modular product design architecture. CIRP Ann.—Manuf. Technol. 62(1), 151–154 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    M.E. Sosa, S.D. Eppinger, Identifying modular and integrative systems and their impact on design team interactions. ASME J. Mech. Des. 125(2), 240–252 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    F. Guo, J.K. Gershenson, Comparison of modular measurement methods based on consistency analysis and sensitivity analysis, in ASME 2003 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, pp. 393–401, 2003Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    F. Guo, J.K. Gershenson, A comparison of modular product design methods on improvement and iteration, in ASME 2004 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, pp. 261–269, 2004Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    X.H. Meng, Z.H. Jiang, Module planning for product family design. J. Shanghai Jiaotong Univ. 40(11), 1869–1872 (2006). (chinese)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    T.Y. Lei, W.P. Peng, J. Lei, Y.H. Zhong, Q.H. Zhang, A product module mining method for PLM database. J. Cent. South Univ. 23(7), 1754–1766 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xian-fu Cheng
    • 1
    Email author
  • Chong Wan
    • 1
  • Hao-yang Qiu
    • 1
  • Jun-yi Luo
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Mechatronics & Vehicle EngineeringEast China Jiaotong UniversityNanchangChina

Personalised recommendations