Advertisement

Microphysical Representations and Their Consistency with In Situ and Remote-Sensing Observations

  • Ziad S. HaddadEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Springer Atmospheric Sciences book series (SPRINGERATMO)

Abstract

The different microphysical schemes developed to date represent hydrometeors using parameters whose statistics—mean values, variances, correlations, and joint probability distribution—have not received much scrutiny, let alone validation against actual observations. This leads to some very problematic inconsistencies, which are described in this chapter, along with guidance on approaches to resolve them objectively.

Keywords

Hydrometeors Cloud microphysics Precipitation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was performed at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Copyright 2018. All rights reserved.

References

  1. Atlas, D. 1990. In Radar in Meteorology—Battan memorial and 40th Anniversary Radar Meteorology Conference, ed. D. Atlas, 86–97.Google Scholar
  2. Atlas, D., C.W. Ulbrich, F.D. Marks, E. Amitai, and C.R. Williams. 1999. Systematic variation of drop size and radar-rainfall relations. Journal Geophysical Research 104: 6155–6169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Gravner, J., and D. Griffeath. 2009. Modeling snow-crystal growth: A three-dimensional mesoscopic approach. Physical Review E 79: 011601.  https://doi.org/10.1103/physreve.79.011601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Haddad, Z.S., S.L. Durden, and E. Im. 1996. Parametrizing the raindrop size distribution. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology 35: 3–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Haddad, Z.S., D.A. Short, S.L. Durden, et al. 1997. A new parametrization of the rain drop size distribution. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Rem. Sens. 35: 532–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Haddad, Z.S., R.C. Sawaya, S. Kacimi, O.O. Sy, F.J. Turk, and J. Steward. 2017. Interpreting millimeter-wave radiances over tropical convective clouds. Journal of Geophysical Research A 122: 1650–1664.  https://doi.org/10.1002/2016jd025923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Heidinger, A.K., C. O’Dell, R. Bennartz, and T. Greenwald. 2006. The Successive-Order-of-Interaction radiative transfer model. Part I: Model development. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology 45: 1388–1402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Heymsfield, A.J., C. Schmitt, A. Bansemer, and C.H. Twohy. 2010. Improved representation of ice particle masses based on observations in natural clouds. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 67: 3303–3318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kuo, K.-S., W.S. Olson, B.T. Johnson, M. Grecu, L. Tian, T.L. Clune, B.H. van Aartsen, A.J. Heymsfield, L. Liao, and R. Meneghini. 2016. The microwave radiative properties of falling snow derived from nonspherical ice particle models. Part I: An extensive database of simulated pristine crystals and aggregate particles, and their scattering properties. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology 55: 691–708.  https://doi.org/10.1175/jamc-d-15-0130.1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Marshall, J.S., and W.M.K. Palmer. 1948. The distribution of raindrops with size. Journal of Meteorology 5: 165–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Schmitt, S.G., and A.J. Heymsfield. 2010. The dimensional characteristics of ice crystal aggregates from fractal geometry. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 67: 1605–1616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Turk, F.J., K.-W. Park, Z.S. Haddad, P. Rodriguez, and D. Hudak. 2011. Constraining CloudSat-based snowfall profiles using AMSU/MHS and C-band ground radar. Journal Geophysical Research 116: D23205.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2011jd016126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ulbrich, C.W., and D. Atlas. 1998. Rainfall microphysics and radar properties: Analysis methods for drop size spectra. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology 37: 912–923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Williams, C.W., V.N. Bringi, L.D. Carey, V. Chandrasekar, P.N. Gitlin, Z.S. Haddad, R. Meneghini, S.J. Munchak, S.W. Nesbitt, W.A. Petersen, S. Tanelli, A. Tokay, A. Wilson, and D.B. Wolff. 2014. Describing the shape of raindrop size distributions using uncorrelated raindrop mass spectrum parameters. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology 53: 1282–1296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Jet Propulsion LaboratoryCalifornia Institute of TechnologyLa Cañada FlintridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations