Advertisement

Stochastic Representation of NCEP GEFS to Improve Sub-seasonal Forecast

  • Yuejian ZhuEmail author
  • Wei Li
  • Xiaqiong Zhou
  • Dingchen Hou
Chapter
Part of the Springer Atmospheric Sciences book series (SPRINGERATMO)

Abstract

The National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) Global Ensemble Forecast System (GEFS) has been in daily operation to provide probabilistic guidance for public since December 1992. Since July 2017, the GEFS was extended from 16 days to 35 days forecast to support NCEP Climate Prediction Center (CPC)’s sub-seasonal forecast. The latest GEFS version was upgraded in three areas to improve sub-seasonal forecast: (1) introducing a new set of stochastic physical perturbations to improve model uncertainty representation for the tropics; (2) a 2-tiered SST approach to consider ocean impact; and (3) a new scale-aware convection scheme to improve model physics for tropical convection and MJO forecasts. The new set of stochastic physical perturbations include stochastic kinetic energy backscatter to make up subscale energy lost during model integration; stochastic physics perturbation tendency with five different spatial and temporal scales to perturb physical tendency; and stochastic perturbed humidity on the model lower level. After upgraded to new set of stochastic physical perturbations, the MJO forecast skill has been improved from 12.5 days of a 25-month period to nearly 22 days by combining all three modifications include stochastic physics. In the extratropics, the 500-hPa geopotential height; surface temperature and precipitation are improved for sub-seasonal timescale as well. However, the raw forecast skills of surface temperature and precipitation are extremely low, and the results imply that calibration may be important and necessary for surface temperature and precipitation forecast for the sub-seasonal timescale due to the large systematic model errors.

Keywords

NCEP GEFS Stochastic representation Sub-seasonal forecast 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank all of the helps from EMC ensemble team members, and Dr. Bing Fu helped to provide Figs. 2 and 3; Mr. Eric Sinsky provided Figs. 4 and 6 in particular. This study is partially supported through NWS’s Office of Science and Technology Integration (OSTI) and NOAA’s Climate Program Office (CPO)’s Modeling, Analysis, Predictions, and Projections (MAPP) program.

References

  1. Berner, J., G.J. Shutts, M. Leutbecher, and T.N. Palmer. 2009. A spectral stochastic kinetic energy backscatter scheme and its impact on flow-dependent predictability in the ECMWF ensemble prediction system. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 66 (3): 603–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Buizza, R., M. Miller, and T. Palmer. 1999. Stochastic representation of model uncertainties in the ECMWF ensemble prediction system. Quarterly Journal Royal Meteorological Society 125 (560): 2887–2908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Christensen, H.M., S.-J. Lock, I.M. Moroz, and T.M. Palmer. 2017. Introducing independent patterns into the stochastically perturbed parametrization tendencies (SPPT) scheme. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, Part A 143 (706): 2168–2181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Han, J., W. Wang, Y.C. Kwon, S.-Y. Hong, V. Tallapragada, and F. Yang. 2017. Updates in the NCEP GFS cumulus convection schemes with scale and aerosol awareness. Weather and Forecasting.  https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-17-0046.1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hou, D., Z. Toth, Y. Zhu, and W. Yang. 2008. Evaluation of the impact of the stochastic perturbation schemes on global ensemble forecast. In Proceedings of the 19th conference on probability and statistics, New Orleans, LA, American Meteor Society. https://ams.confex.com/ams/88Annual/webprogram/Paper134165.html.
  6. Johnson, N.C., D. Collins, S. Feldstein, M. L’Heureux, and E. Riddle. 2014. Skillful wintertime North American temperature forecasts out to 4 weeks based on the state of ENSO and the MJO. Weather and Forecasting 29: 23–38.  https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-13-00102.1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kirtman, B.P., D. Min, and J.M. Infanti. 2014. The North American multimodel ensemble: Phase-1 seasonal-to-interannual prediction; Phase-2 toward developing intraseasonal prediction. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 95: 585–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Li, W., R. Yu, H. Liu, and Y. Yu. 2001. Impacts of diurnal cycle of SST on the intraseasonal variation of surface heat flux over the western Pacific warm pool. Advances in Atmospheric Sciences 18 (5): 793–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Li, W., Y. Zhu, X. Zhou, D. Hou, E. Sinsky, C. Melhauser, M. Pena, H. Guan, and R. Wobus. 2018. Evaluating the MJO prediction skill from different configurations of NCEP GEFS extended forecast. Climate Dynamics,  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-018-4423-9.
  10. Ling, T., M. Xu, X.-Z. Liang, J.X.L. Wang, and Y. Noh. 2015. A multilevel ocean mixed layer model resolving the diurnal cycle: Development and validation. Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems 07.  https://doi.org/10.1002/2015ms000476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Liu, X., T. Wu, S. Yang, T. Li, W. Jie, L. Zhang, Z. Wang, X. Liang, Q. Li, Y. Cheng, H. Ren, Y. Fang, and S. Nie. 2016. MJO prediction using the sub-seasonal to seasonal forecast model of Beijing Climate Center. Climate Dynamics.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-016-3264-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lorenz, E. 1969. The predictability of a flow which possesses many scales of motion. Tellus 21: 289–307.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2153-3490.1969.tb00444.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Palmer, T.N., et al. 2004. Development of a European multi-model ensemble system for seasonal to inter-annual prediction (DEMETER). Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 85: 853–872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Palmer, T.N., R. Buizza, F. Doblas-Reyes, T. Jung, M. Leutbecher, G. Shutts, M. Steinheimer, and A. Weisheimer. 2009. Stochastic parametrization and model uncertainty. Technical Report ECMWF RD Tech. Memo. 598, 42 pp. http://www.ecmwf.int/publications/.
  15. Shin, D.W., and T.N. Krishnamurti. 2003. Short- to medium-range superensemble precipitation forecasts using satellite products: 1. Deterministic forecasting. Journal of Geophysical Research 108 (D8): 8383.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2001jd001511.
  16. Shutts, G. 2005. A kinetic energy backscatter algorithm for use in ensemble prediction systems. Quarterly Journal Royal Meteorological Society 131: 3079–3102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Shutts, G. 2015. A stochastic convective backscatter scheme for use in ensemble prediction systems. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society: Part A 141 (692): 2602–2616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Shutts, G., and T.N. Palmer. 2004. The use of high-resolution numerical simulations of tropical circulation to calibrate stochastic physics schemes. In Proceedings of the ECMWF/CLIVAR simulation and prediction of intra-seasonal variability with emphasis on the MJO, Reading, United Kingdom, European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts, 83–102.Google Scholar
  19. Tian, D., Eric F. Wood, and X. Yuan. 2017. CFSv2-based sub-seasonal precipitation and temperature forecast skill over the contiguous United States. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 21: 1477–1490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Tompkins, A.M., and J. Berner. 2008. A stochastic convective approach to account for model uncertainty due to unresolved humidity variability. Journal Geophysical Research 113: D18101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Troccoli, A. 2010. Seasonal climate forecasting. Meteorological Applications 17: 251–268.  https://doi.org/10.1002/met.184.
  22. Vitart, F. 2014. Evolution of ECMWF sub-seasonal forecast skill scores. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society 140: 1889–1899.  https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Zhou, X., Y. Zhu, D. Hou, and D. Kleist. 2016. Comparison of the ensemble transform and the ensemble Kalman filter in the NCEP global ensemble forecast system. Weather and Forecasting 31: 2058–2074.Google Scholar
  24. Zhou, X., Y. Zhu, D. Hou, Y. Luo, J. Peng, and D. Wobus. 2017. The NCEP global ensemble forecast system with the EnKF initialization. Weather and Forecasting 32: 1989–2004. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Zhu, Y.X., M. Zhou, W. Pena, C.Melhauser Li, and D. Hou. 2017. Impact of sea surface temperature forcing on weeks 3 and 4 forecast skill in the NCEP global ensemble forecasting system. Weather and Forecasting 32: 2159–2173.  https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-17-0093.1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Zhu, Y., X. Zhou, W. Li, D. Hou, C. Melhauser, E. Sinsky, M. Pena, B. Fu, H. Guan, W. Kolczynski, R. Wobus, and V. Tallapragada. 2018. An assessment of subseasonal forecast skill using an extended global ensemble forecast system (GEFS). Journal of Geophysical Research 6732–6745.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD028506.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© This is a U.S. government work and not under copyright protection in the U.S.; foreign copyright protection may apply 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yuejian Zhu
    • 1
    Email author
  • Wei Li
    • 1
  • Xiaqiong Zhou
    • 1
  • Dingchen Hou
    • 1
  1. 1.Environmental Modeling Center, NCEP/NWS/NOAACollege ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations