Robot-Assisted Neurosurgery

  • Indu Kapoor
  • Charu Mahajan
  • Hemanshu Prabhakar


Robot-assisted neurosurgery was developed to improve the effectiveness and feasibility of several procedures that require higher precision and accuracy. Apart from common neurosurgical procedures like biopsy, neuroendoscopy, and radiosurgery, various sophisticated surgeries like brain tumor removal, deep electrode placement, and surgery for intractable epilepsy have been proposed recently. The medical field is accepting robots in terms of adaptability, versatility, safety, and extensive information. The main aim is to improve the surgical skill so as to perform more precise and minimally invasive surgery which in turn will improve overall morbidity and mortality of patients. Literature is limited in providing information about anesthetic concerns in robotic surgeries. In this section we will discuss the role of robots used in different neurosurgical procedures and their anesthetic concerns.


Robot Neurosurgery Anesthesia Safety Future 


  1. 1.
    Estey EP. Robotic prostatectomy: the new standard of care or a marketing success? Can Urol Assoc J. 2009;3:488–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    O’Toole MD, Bouazza-Marouf K, Kerr D, et al. A methodology for design and appraisal of surgical robotic systems. Robotica. 2009;28:297–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ullah W, McLean A, Hunter RJ, et al. Randomized trial comparing robotic to manual ablation for atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm. 2014;11:1862–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Van der Sluis PC, Ruurda JP, van der Horst S, et al. Robot-assisted minimally invasive thoraco-laparoscopic esophagectomy versus open transthoracic esophagectomy for resectable esophageal cancer, a randomized controlled trial (ROBOT trial). Trials. 2012;13:230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Corrado G, Cutillo G, Pomati G, et al. Surgical and oncological outcome of robotic surgery compared to laparoscopic and abdominal surgery in the management of endometrial cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2015;41:1074–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Liu H, Lawrie TA, Lu D, et al. Robot-assisted surgery in gynaecology. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;12:CD011422. Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gurusamy KS, Samraj K, Fusai G, et al. Robot assistant versus human or another robot assistant in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;9:CD006578. Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gui H, Zhang S, Luan N, et al. Novel system for navigation-and robot-assisted craniofacial surgery: establishment of the principle prototype. J Craniofac Surg. 2015;26:746–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Roser F, Tatagiba M, Maier G. Spinal robotics: current applications and future perspectives. Neurosurgery. 2013;72:12–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Haegelen C, Touzet G, Reyns N, et al. Stereotactic robot-guided biopsies of brain stem lesions: experience with 15 cases. Neurochirurgie. 2010;56:363–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kulkarni AV, RivaCambrin J, Holubkov R, et al. Endoscopic third ventriculostomy in children: prospective, multicenter results from the Hydrocephalus Clinical Research Network. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2016;18:423–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hoshide R, Calayag M, Meltzer H, et al. Robot-assisted endoscopic third ventriculostomy: institutional experience in 9 patients. J NeurosurgPediatr. 2017;20:125–33.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fiani B, Quadri SA, Ramakrishnan V, et al. Retrospective review on accuracy: a pilot study of robotically guided thoracolumbar/sacral pedicle screws versus fluoroscopy-guided and computerized tomography stealth-guided screws. Cureus. 2017;9:e1437.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Eddib A, Hughes S, Aalt M, et al. Impact of age on surgical outcomes after robot assisted laparoscopic hysterectomies. Surg Sci. 2014;5:90–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ettore É, Wyckaert E, David R, et al. Robotics and improvement of the quality of geriatric care. Soins Gerontol. 2016;21:15–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Miller BA, Salehi A, Limbrick DD, et al. Applications of a robotic stereotactic arm for pediatric epilepsy and neurooncology surgery. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2017;20:364–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Carai A, Mastronuzzi A, De Benedictis A, et al. Robot-assisted stereotactic biopsy of diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma: a single-center experience. World Neurosurg. 2017;101:584–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hoshide R, Calayag M, Meltzer H, et al. Robot-assisted endoscopic third ventriculostomy: institutional experience in 9 patients. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2017;20:125–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Macke JJ, Woo R, Varich L. Accuracy of robot-assisted pedicle screw placement for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in the pediatric population. J Robot Surg. 2016;10:145–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Chauvet D, Hans S, Missistrano A, et al. Transoral robotic surgery for sellar tumors: first clinical study. J Neurosurg. 2017;127:941–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tsai EC, Santoreneos S, Rutka JT. Tumors of the skull base in children: review of tumor types and management strategies. Neurosurg Focus. 2002;12:e1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Vougioukas VI, Hubbe U, Hochmuth A, et al. Perspectives and limitations of image-guided neurosurgery in pediatric patients. Childs Nerv Syst. 2003;19:783–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    De Benedictis A, Trezza A, Carai A, et al. Robot-assisted procedures in pediatric neurosurgery. Neurosurg Focus. 2017;42:E7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Marcus HJ, Hughes-Hallett A, Cundy TP, et al. da Vinci robot-assisted keyhole neurosurgery: a cadaver study on feasibility and safety. Neurosurg Rev. 2015;38:367–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hong WC, Tsai JC, Chang SD, et al. Robotic skull base surgery via supraorbital keyhole approach: a cadaveric study. Neurosurgery. 2013;72:33–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Fomekong E, Safi SE, Raftopoulos C. Spine navigation based on 3-dimensional robotic fluoroscopy for accurate percutaneous pedicle screw placement: a prospective study of 66 consecutive cases. World Neurosurg. 2017;108:76–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Pak N, Siegle JH, Kinney JP, et al. Closed-loop, ultraprecise, automated craniotomies. J Neurophysiol. 2015;113:3943–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ishikawa N, Watanabe G. Robot-assisted cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015;21:322–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sert MB, Eraker R. Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery in gynaecological oncology; initial experience at Oslo Radium Hospital and 16 months follow-up. Int J Med Robot. 2009;5:410–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Siebert W, Mai S, Kober R, Heeckt PF. Technique and first clinical results of robot-assisted total knee replacement. Knee. 2002;9:173–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Chen B, Finnerty BM, Schamberg NJ, et al. Transabdominal robotic repair of a congenital right diaphragmatic hernia containing an intrathoracic kidney: a case report. J Robot Surg. 2015;9:357–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Michiels C, Rouffilange J, Comat V, et al. Total preperitoneal robot-assisted kidney transplantation. J Endourol Case Rep. 2017;3:169–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Dobbs TD, Cundy O, Samarendra H, et al. A systematic review of the role of robotics in plastic and reconstructive surgery-from inception to the future. Front Surg. 2017;4:66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Herling SF, Dreijer B, Wrist Lam G, et al. Total intravenous anaesthesia versus inhalational anaesthesia for adults undergoing transabdominal robotic assisted laparoscopic surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;4:CD011387. Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kapoor I, Rath GP. Robotized surgical assistant in neurosurgery. Anaesthetic implication! J Neuroanaesthesiol Crit Care. 2016;3:151–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Hodge B, Thompson JF. Noise pollution in the operating theatre. Lancet. 1990;335:891–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Shapiro RA, Berland T. Noise in the operating room. N Engl J Med. 1972:1236–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Cabrera IN, Lee MH. Reducing noise pollution in the hospital setting by establishing a department of sound: a survey of recent research on the effects of noise and music in health care. Prev Med. 2000;30:339–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    West J, Vishniac IB, King J, et al. Noise reduction in an operating room: a case study. J Acoust Soc Am. 2008;123:3677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Siu KC, Suh IH, Mukherjee M, et al. The impact of environmental noise on robot-assisted laparoscopic surgical performance. Surgery. 2010;147:107–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Kitahara H, Patel B, McCrorey M, et al. Morbid obesity does not increase morbidity or mortality in robotic cardiac surgery. Innovations. 2017;12:434–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Wetzel CM, Kneebone RL, Woloshynowych M, et al. The effects of stress on surgical performance. Am J Surg. 2006;191(1):5–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Hurley AM, Kennedy PJ, O’Connor L, et al. SOS save our surgeons: stress levels reduced by robotic surgery. Gynecol Surg. 2015;12:197–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Indu Kapoor
    • 1
  • Charu Mahajan
    • 1
  • Hemanshu Prabhakar
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Neuroanaesthesiology and Neuro-Critical CareAll India Institute of Medical SciencesNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations