Advertisement

Teaching Out-of-Field as a Phenomenon and Research Problem

  • Linda HobbsEmail author
  • Günter Törner
Chapter

Abstract

Teacher specialisations ensure that teachers have the specialised knowledge to teach in that subject, or year level. They provide a sense of identity, and help to organise teachers around common commitments and expertise. What happens for teachers who find themselves teaching a subject or level or which they are not specialised? While we know about teaching out-of-field from practice and research, there is a need to share and learn from each other in a way that respects international differences in how this phenomenon is understood and manifested. This chapter has three intentions: to highlight the significance of teaching out-of-field as a phenomenon and a research problem; summarise the dimensions and issues associated with out-of-field teaching; and provide a rationale for taking an international perspective on examining the out-of-field phenomenon.

Keywords

Teaching out-of-field Teaching across specialisations Definitions and dimensions of teaching out-of-field 

References

  1. Australian Mathematical Sciences Institute [AMSI]. (2013). Discipline profile of the mathematical sciences. Melbourne: AMSI.Google Scholar
  2. Anonymous, (2013). Shattered dreams. Science Education News, 62(3), 154–157.Google Scholar
  3. Bosse, M., & Törner, G. (2013). Out-of-field teaching mathematics teachers and the ambivalent role of beliefs—a first report from interviews. In M. S. Hannula, P. Portaankorva-Koivisto, A. Laine, & L. Näveri (Eds.), Current State of Research on Mathematical Beliefs XVIII Proceedings of the MAVI-18 Conference (pp. 341–355). Helsinki.Google Scholar
  4. Bosse, M., & Törner, G. (2015a). The practice of out-of-field teaching in mathematics classrooms-a German case study. In L. Sumpter (Ed.), Current State of Research on Mathematical Beliefs XX: Proceedings of the MAVI-20 Conference Kultur och Lärande, Vol. 2015:04 (pp. 77–88). Falun: Högskolan Dalarna University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bosse, M., & Törner, G. (2015b). Teacher identity as a theoretical framework for researching out-of-field teaching mathematics teachers. In C. Bernack, R. Erens, A. Eichler, & T. Leuders (Eds.), Views and beliefs in mathematics education -contributions of the 19th MAVI conference (pp. 1–14). Wiesbaden: Springer Spektrum.Google Scholar
  6. Brodbelt, S. (1990). Out-of-field teaching. The Clearing House, 63(6), 282–285.Google Scholar
  7. Bulman, J. (2008). Outfielder stories: Supporting primary teachers teaching secondary science to come in from the margins. Ph.D., Central Queensland University, North Rockhampton.Google Scholar
  8. Bürgerschaft der Freien Hansestadt Hamburg. (2016). Schriftliche Kleine Anfrage der Abgeordneten Anna-Elisabeth von Treuenfels-Frowein (FDP) vom 14.01.16 und Antwort des Senats. Drucksache 21/2874, 22.01.16. https://kleineanfragen.de/hamburg/21/2874-fachfremd-erteilter-schulunterricht-in-den-gesellschaftswissenschaftlichen-faechern.
  9. Caldis, S. (2017). Teaching ‘out-of-field’: Teachers having to know what they do not know. Geography Bulletin, 49(1), 13–17.Google Scholar
  10. Carlsen, W. S. (1992). Closing down the conversation: Discouraging student talk on unfamiliar science content. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 27(2), 15–21.Google Scholar
  11. Chan, K. K. H., & Yung, B. H. W. (2018). Developing pedagogical content knowledge for teaching a new topic: More than teaching experience and subject matter knowledge. Research in Science Education, 48(2), 233–265.Google Scholar
  12. Cinkir, S., & Kurum, G. (2015). Discrepancy in tea her employment: The problem of out-of-field teacher employment. Educational Planning, 22(1), 29–47.Google Scholar
  13. Clerkin, A., Perkins, R., & Cunningham, R. (2015). TIMSS 2015 in Ireland: Mathematics and science in primary and post-primary schools. Dublin Educational Research Centre. http://www.erc.ie/studies/timss/.
  14. Coetzer, L., & Coetzee, E. (2015). Out-of-field teaching as a major cause for teachers’ stress and tension related experiences in the rural areas of South Africa. In Proceedings of MAC-ETeL 2015: Multidisciplinary Academic Conference on Education, teaching and E-learning. Prague.Google Scholar
  15. Crisan, C., & Rodd, M. (2011). Teachers of mathematics to mathematics teachers: A TDA mathematics development programme for teachers. British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics, 31(3), 29–34.Google Scholar
  16. Darby, L. (2005). Science students’ perceptions of engaging pedagogy. Research in Science Education, 35, 425–445.Google Scholar
  17. Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of State policy evidence. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(1), 1–9.Google Scholar
  18. Dee, T. S., & Cohodes, S. R. (2008). Out-of-field teachers and student achievement: Evidence from matched-pairs comparisons. Public Finance Review, 36(1), 7–32.Google Scholar
  19. Du Plessis, A. E. (2005) The implications of the out of field phenomenon for school management. Master of Education Thesis, University of South Africa.Google Scholar
  20. Du Plessis, A. E. (2014). Understanding the out-of-field teaching experience. A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, The University of Queensland, Brisbane.Google Scholar
  21. Du Plessis, A. E. (2015). Effective education: Conceptualising the meaning of out-of-field teaching practices for teachers, teacher quality and school leaders. International Journal of Educational Research, 72(2015), 89–102.Google Scholar
  22. Du Plessis, A. E., Carroll, A., & Gillies, R. M. (2014). Out-of-field teaching and professional development: A transnational investigation across Australia and South Africa. International Journal of Educational Research, 66, 90–102.Google Scholar
  23. Du Plessis, A. E., Carroll, A., & Gillies, R. M. (2015). Understanding the lived experiences of novice out-of-field teachers in relation to school leadership practices. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 43(1), 4–21.Google Scholar
  24. Du Plessis, A. E. (2018). Professional support beyond initial teacher education: How to manage teaching out-of-field. Singapore: Springer.Google Scholar
  25. Education Council. (2018). Optimising STEM industry-school partnerships: Inspiring Australia’s next generation Final Report. South Carlton: Education Council.Google Scholar
  26. Ee gyeong, K. (2011). Out-of-field secondary school teachers in Korea: Their realities and implications. KEDI Journal of Educational Policy, 8(1), 29–48.Google Scholar
  27. Faulkner, F., Lane, C., & Smith, A. (2016) A CPD programme for out-of-field mathematics teachers: Programme outline and preliminary evaluations by participants. In Science and Mathematics Education Conference, 16th–17th June 2016, Dublin City University.Google Scholar
  28. Greary, T., Barnes, I., Mostafa, T., Pensiero, N., & Swensson, C. (2016). Trends in Maths and Science Study (TIMSS): National Report for England. Research report, UCL Institute of Education, for the English Department of Education. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/timss-2015-national-report-for-england.
  29. Harris, K. L., & Jensz, F. (2006). The preparation of mathematics teachers in Australia. In Meeting the Demand for Suitably Qualified Mathematics Teachers in Secondary Schools. Melbourne, Australia: Centre of the Study of Higher Education, The University of Melbourne.Google Scholar
  30. Harris, K.-L., Jensz, F., & Baldwin, G. (2005). Who’s teaching science? Meeting the demand for qualified science teachers in Australian secondary schools. Melbourne, Australia: Centre for the Study of Higher Education, The University of Melbourne.Google Scholar
  31. Hillman, J. (2014). Mathematics after 16: The state of play, challenges and ways ahead. London: Nuffield Foundation.Google Scholar
  32. Hobbs, L. (2012). Examining the aesthetic dimensions of teaching: Relationships between teacher knowledge, identity and passion. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28, 718–727.Google Scholar
  33. Hobbs, L. (2013a). Teaching ‘out-of-field’ as a boundary-crossing event: Factors shaping teacher identity. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11(2), 271–297.Google Scholar
  34. Hobbs, L. (2013b). Boundary crossings of out-of-field teachers: Locating learning possibilities amid disruption. In J. Langan-Fox & C. L. Cooper (Eds.), Boundary-spanning in organizations: Network, influence, and conflict (pp. 7–28). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  35. Hobbs, L. (2015). Too many teachers teaching outside their area of expertise. The Conversation Australia, The Conversation Trust. Retrieved April 13, 2015, from https://theconversation.com/too-many-teachers-teaching-outside-their-area-of-expertise-39688.
  36. Hobbs, L. & Törner, G. (Eds.) (2014). Taking an international perspective on “Out-of-field” Teaching: Proceedings and agenda for research and action from the 1st Teaching Across Specialisations (TAS) Collective Symposium. TAS Collective. https://www.uni-due.de/TAS.
  37. Ibarra, H. (1999). Provisional selves: Experimenting with image and identity in professional adaptation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 764–791.Google Scholar
  38. Ingersoll, R. (1998). The problem of out-of-field teaching. Phi Delta Kappan, 773–776.Google Scholar
  39. Ingersoll, R. M. (1999). The problem of underqualified teachers in American secondary schools. Educational Researcher, 28(2), 26–37.Google Scholar
  40. Ingersoll, R. M. (2002). Out-of-field teaching, educational inequity, and the organization of schools: An exploratory analysis. Washington, DC: Centre of the Study of Teaching and Policy.Google Scholar
  41. Ingersoll, R. M. (Ed.). (2007). A comparative srtudy of teacher preparation and qualifications in six nations. Pennsylvania: CPRE.Google Scholar
  42. Kenny, J., Whannell, R., & Hobbs, L. (accepted). Designing professional learning for in-service teachers teaching out-of-field. Teaching and Teacher Education.Google Scholar
  43. Lee, E., & Luft, J. A. (2008). Experienced secondary science teachers’ representation of pedagogical content knowledge. International Journal of Science Education, 30(10), 1343–1363.Google Scholar
  44. Luft, J. A., Dubois, S. L., Nixon, R. S., & Campbell, B. K. (2015). Supporting newly hired teachers of science: Attaining teacher professional standards. Studies in Science Education, 51(1), 1–48.Google Scholar
  45. McConney, A., & Price, A. (2009a). An assessment of the phenomenon of “teaching out-of-field” in WA schools. Perth, Australia: Western Australian College of Teaching.Google Scholar
  46. McConney, A., & Price, A. (2009b). Teaching out-of-field in Western Australia. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 34(6), 86–100.Google Scholar
  47. Neakrase, J. J. (2010). Nature of nurture? A characterization of the knowledge and practices of in- and out-of-field beginning secondary physics teachers. A Dissertation presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy, Arizona State University.Google Scholar
  48. Ní Ríordáin, M., & Hannigan, A. (2009). Out-of-field teaching in post-primary mathematics education: An analysis of the Irish context. Research report, National Centre for Excellence in Mathematics and Science Teaching and Learning. ISBN 1–905952-23-6.Google Scholar
  49. Ní Ríordáin, M., & Hannigan, A. (2011). Who teaches mathematics at second-level in Ireland? Irish Educational Studies, 30(3), 289–304.Google Scholar
  50. Nixon, R., Luft, J. A., & Ross, R. (2017). Prevalence and predictors of out-of-field teaching in the first five years. Journal of Research in Science Teaching.  https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21402.Google Scholar
  51. Olitsky, S. (2006). Facilitating identity formation, group membership, and learning in science classrooms: What can be learned from out-of-field teaching in an urban school? Science Education, 91(2), 201–221.  https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20182.Google Scholar
  52. Pillay, H., Goddard, R., & Wilss, L. (2005). Well-being, burnout and competence: Implications for teachers. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 30(2), 22–33.Google Scholar
  53. Porsch, R. (2016). Fachfremd unterrichten in Deutschland: Definition–Verbreitung–Auswirkungen. Die Deutsche Schule, 108(1), 9–32.Google Scholar
  54. Productivity Commission. (2012). Schools Workforce. Research Report, Canberra Productivity Commission.Google Scholar
  55. Productivity Commission. (2017). Shifting the dial: 5 year productivity review. Canberra: Productivity Commission. (Inquiry report no. 84).Google Scholar
  56. Salleh, U. K. M. (2013a). An investigation into differences between out-of-field and in-field history teachers’ influence on learning experiences in Malaysian secondary schools. Ph.D. thesis, University of Adelaide.Google Scholar
  57. Salleh, U. K. M. (2013b). Differences between in-field and out-of-field history teachers influence on students learning experience in Malaysian secondary schools. Creative Education, 4(9), 5–9.Google Scholar
  58. Schueler, S., Roesken-Winter, B, Weißenrieder, J., Lambert, A. & Romer, M. (2016). Characteristics of out-of-field teaching: Teacher beliefs and competencies. In K. Krainer, & N. Vondrova (Eds.), Proceedings of the Ninth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education, Feb 2015, pp. 3254–3261. Prague: Czech Republic.Google Scholar
  59. Selvakumaran, Y. (in preparation). From weakness to strength: Turning the challenge of ‘out of field teaching’ into a team that thrives. In D. M. Netolicky, J. Andrews, & C. Paterson (Eds.) Flip the system Australia: What matters in education. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  60. Sharplin, E. D. (2014). Reconceptualising out-of-field teaching: Experiences of rural teachers in Western Australia. Educational Research, 56(1), 97–110.Google Scholar
  61. Steyn, G., & Du Plessis, E. (2007). The implication of the out-of-field phenomenon for effective teaching, quality education and school management. Africa Education Review, 4(2), 144–158.Google Scholar
  62. Taylor, T. (2000). The future of the past: Final report of the national inquiry into school history. Retrieved January 6 2010 from http://www.dest.gov.au.
  63. The School District of Volusia County. (2017). Out of Field. http://myvolusiaschools.org/hr-certification/Pages/Out-of-Field.aspx.
  64. Thomson, S., Hillman, K., & Wernert, N. (2012). Monitoring Australian year 8 student achievement internationally: TIMSS 2011. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research (ACER).Google Scholar
  65. Törner, G., & Törner, A. (2012). Underqualified math teachers or out-of-field teaching in mathematics–a neglectable field of action? In Blum et al. (Eds.) Mathematikunterricht im Kontext von Realität, Kultur und Lehrerprofessionalität (pp. 196–206). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  66. Vukovic, R. (2017). School improvement Episode 11: Out-of-field teaching. https://www.teachermagazine.com.au/articles/school-improvement-episode-11-out-of-field-teaching.
  67. Weldon, P. R. (2015). The teacher workforce in Australia: Supply, demand and data issues. Policy Insights, Issue 2. Melbourne: CER.Google Scholar
  68. Weldon, P. R. (2016). Out-of-field teaching in Australian secondary schools. In Policy Insights, (vol. 6). Melbourne: ACER.Google Scholar
  69. Zhou, Y. (2012). Out-of-field teaching: A cross-national study on teacher labour market and teacher quality. Ph.D. thesis, Michigan State University.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Deakin UniversityGeelongAustralia
  2. 2.University of Duisburg-EssenEssenGermany

Personalised recommendations