Advertisement

Diversity and Equity in Plural Societies: Psychological Perspectives

  • John W. Berry
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter presents a framework for understanding the concept of diversity as being inclusive of variations in culture, ethnicity, religion, age, gender and sexual orientation. It further underscores the relationship between diversity and opportunity for equitable participation, which is considered essential for societal development.

Keywords

Diversity Equity Marginalization Migration Multiculturalism 

References

  1. Alesina, A., Devleeschauwer, A., Eastery, W., Kurlat, S., & Wacziarg, R. (2003). Fractionalization. Journal of Economic Growth, 8, 155–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alesina, A., Harnoss, J., & Rappoport, H. (2015). Birthplace diversity and economic prosperity (NBER Working Paper No. 18699). Google Scholar
  3. Banting, K., & Kymlicka, W. (2006–2012). The multicultural policy index. http://www.queensu.ca/mcp/
  4. Berry, J. W. (1970). Marginality, stress and ethnic identification in an acculturated Aboriginal community. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1, 239–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berry, J. W. (1974). Psychological aspects of cultural pluralism: Unity and identity reconsidered. Topics in Culture Learning, 2, 17–22.Google Scholar
  6. Berry, J. W. (1980). Acculturation as varieties of adaptation. In A. Padilla (Ed.), Acculturation: Theory, models and some new findings (pp. 9–25). Boulder: Westview.Google Scholar
  7. Berry, J. W. (1984). Multicultural policy in Canada: A social psychological analysis. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 16, 353–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Berry, J. W. (1997). Immigration, acculturation and adaptation. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 46, 5–68.Google Scholar
  9. Berry, J. W. (1998). Social psychological costs and benefits of multiculturalism. Trames: Estonian Journal of Social Sciences, 2, 209–233.Google Scholar
  10. Berry, J. W. (2003). Conceptual approaches to acculturation. In K. Chun, P. Balls-Organista, & G. Marin (Eds.), Acculturation: Theory, method and applications (pp. 17–37). Washington, DC: APA Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Berry, J. W. (2006). Attitudes towards immigrants and ethnocultural groups in Canada. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 30, 719–734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Berry, J. W. (2013). Research on multiculturalism in Canada. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 37, 663–675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Berry, J. W. (2014). Multiculturalism: Psychological perspectives. In J. Jedwab (Ed.), The multiculturalism question: Debating identity in 21st-century Canada (pp. 225–240). Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Berry, J. W. (Ed.). (2017). Mutual intercultural relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Berry, J. W., & Laponce, J. A. (Eds.). (1994). Ethnicity and culture in Canada: The research landscape. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  16. Berry, J. W., Kalin, R., & Taylor, D. (1977). Multiculturalism and ethnic attitudes in Canada. Ottawa: Ministry of Supply and Services.Google Scholar
  17. Berry, J. W., Phinney, J. S., Sam, D. L., & Vedder, P. (Eds.). (2006). Immigrant youth in cultural transition: Acculturation, identity and adaptation across national contexts. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  18. Bloemraad, I. (2011). The debate over multiculturalism: Philosophy, politics, and policy. Migration Information Source. http://www.migrationinformation.org/Feature/display.cfm?ID=854
  19. Bourhis, R. Y., Moïse, C., Perreault, S., & Senécal, S. (1997). Towards an interactive acculturation model: A social psychological approach. International Journal of Psychology, 32, 369–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Canada. (1971). Policy on multiculturalism. Statement by Prime Minister Trudeau, House of Commons Debate, page 8456.Google Scholar
  21. European Commission. (2007). Eurobarometer: Discrimination in the European Union. http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_263_en.pdf
  22. European Union. (2005). Common basic principles for immigrant integration policy in the EU. Brussels: Author. www.iccsi.ie/resources/EU%20Basic%20Principles
  23. Fearon, J. (2003). Ethnic and cultural diversity by country. Journal of Economic Growth, 8(2), 195–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fleras, A. (2009). The politics of multiculturalism: Multicultural governance in comparative perspective. London: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. MIPEX. (2010). Key findings. Immigrant integration policy. http://www.mipex.eu/countries
  26. Mishra, R. C., Sinha, D., & Berry, J. W. (1996). Ecology, acculturation and psychological adaptation: A study of Adivasi in Bihar. New Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar
  27. Mishra, R. C., Bano, S., & Tripathi, R. C. (2017). Hindu-Muslim relations in India. In J. W. Berry (Ed.), Mutual intercultural relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Nguyen, A.-M. T. D., & Benet-Martínez, V. (2013). Biculturalism and adjustment: A meta-analysis. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 44, 122–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Number 10. (2011). PM’s speech at Munich Security Conference. Retrieved January 28, 2012, http://www.number10.gov.uk/news/pms/speech
  30. Sam, D.L. & Berry, J.W. (eds). (2016). Cambridge handbook of acculturation psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  31. Sinha, D. (1988). Basic Indian values and behavior dispositions in the context of national development: An appraisal. In D. Sinha & H. S. R. Kao (Eds.), Social values and development: Asian perspectives (pp. 31–55). New Delhi: SAGE.Google Scholar
  32. Tripathi, R. C., & Mishra, R. C. (2016). Acculturation in South Asia. In D. L. Sam & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of acculturation psychology (pp. 337–354). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Tropp, L., & Pettigrew, T. (2011). When groups meet. London: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  34. Van de Vijver, F., Breugelmans, S., & Schalk-Soekar, S. (2008). Multiculturalism: Construct validity and stability. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 32, 93–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Vertovec, S., & Wessendorf, S. (Eds.). (2010). The multiculturalism backlash: European discourses, policies and practices. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  36. Ward, C., & Masgoret, A.-M. (2008). Attitudes toward immigrants, immigration and multiculturalism in New Zealand. International Migration Review, 42, 222–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wright, M., & Bloemraad, I. (2012). Is there a trade-off between multiculturalism and socio-political integration? Policy regimes and immigrant incorporation in comparative perspective. Perspectives on Politics, 10, 77–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Yogeeswaran, K., & Dasgupta, N. (2014). The devil is in the details: Abstract versus concrete construals of multiculturalism differentially impact intergroup relations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106, 772–789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • John W. Berry
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Queen’s UniversityKingstonCanada
  2. 2.Higher School of EconomicsMoscowRussian Federation

Personalised recommendations