Advertisement

Customer-Initiated Conversations on Facebook Pages of Tesco and Walmart

  • Swaleha PeerooEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 863)

Abstract

Businesses are using social media as marketing tools to communicate and interact with customers. Customers initiate conversations on social networking sites of businesses but there is scant research as to why customers interact with businesses on social media in the grocery sector. This paper sets out to explore why customers initiate conversations and how do the other members of the online brand community react to those customer posts. Netnography was used to analyse the customer-initiated posts on Facebook pages of grocery stores. This study reveals that customers start discussions to express their satisfaction and gratitude, to criticise an action of the company, to complain about a product or service, to warn customers about a product or service, to recommend a product or service, or simply to engage in conversation with the community and the company. Findings show that most of customer-initiated posts are about complaints and criticisms. Also customers react more to customer complaints and criticisms than to favourable customer posts. This paper contributes to knowledge by identifying why customers post comments on the official Facebook pages of grocery stores and also by revealing the ways customers react to customer-initiated posts.

Keywords

Social media Online brand communities Grocery stores Facebook 

References

  1. 1.
    Kane, G.C.: The evolutionary implications of social media for organizational knowledge management. Inf. Organ. 27(1), 37–46 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ul Islam, J., Rahman, Z.: The impact of online brand community characteristics on customer engagement: a solicitation of stimulus-organism-response theory. Telematics. Inform (2017). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.01.004
  3. 3.
    Pfeffer, J., Zorbach, T., Carley, K.M.: Understanding online firestorms: negative word-of-mouth dynamics in social media networks. J. Mark. Commun. 20(1–2), 117–128 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1080/13527266.2013.797778CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mangold, W.G., Faulds, D.J.: Social media: the new hybrid element of the promotion mix. Bus. Horiz. 52, 357–365 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Coelho, D., Las Casas, A.: Consumers perceptions of generation Y in the acquisition of technology products (computers) at the point of sale. Int. J. Res. IT, Manage. Eng. 3(3), 42–57 (2013)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tarnowski, J.: Social studies. Progressive Grocer 90(7), 85–130 (2011)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Arnaboldi, M., Coget, J.F.: Social media and business. Organ. Dyn., 2. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2015.12.006 (2016)
  8. 8.
    Labrecque, L.: Fostering consumer–brand relationships in social media environments: the role of parasocial interaction. J. Interact. Mark. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2013.12.003 (2014)
  9. 9.
    Ho, C.: Consumer behavior on Facebook. EuroMed J. Bus. 9(3), 252–267 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Veloutsou, C.: Brands as relationship facilitators in consumer markets. Mark. Theory 9(1), 123–126 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Muniz, A., O’Guinn, T.: Brand community. J. Consum. Res. 27(4), 412–432, 421 (2001)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pöyry, E., Parvinen, P., Malmivaara, T.: Can we get from liking to buying? Behavioral differences in hedonic and utilitarian Facebook usage. Electron. Commer. Res. Appl. 12, 224–235 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Vanden Bergh, B., Lee, M., Quilliam, E., Hove, T.: The multidimensional nature and brand impact of user-generated ad parodies in social media. Int. J. Advertising 30(1), 103–131 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Porter, C., Donthu, N., MacElroy, W., Wydra, D.: How to foster and sustain engagement in virtual communities’. Calif. Manag. Rev. 53(4), 80–110 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Colleoni, E.: CSR communication strategies for organizational legitimacy in social media. Corp. Commun.: An Int. J. 18(2), 228–248 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Schulze Horn, I., Taros, T., Dirkes, S., Huer, L., Rose, M., Tietmeyer, R., Constantinides, E.: Business reputation and social media—a primer on threats and responses. IDM J. Dir., Data. Digital. Mark. Pract. 16(3), 4. http://www.palgrave-journals.com/dddmp/index.html (2015)
  17. 17.
    Cheong, H., Morrison, M.: Consumers’ reliance on product information and recommendations found in UGC. J. Interact. Advertising 8(2), 1–29 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jurgens, M., Berthon, P., Edelman, L., Pitt, L.: Social media revolutions: the influence of secondary stakeholders. Bus. Horiz. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2015.11.010 (2016)
  19. 19.
    Peeroo, S., Samy, M., Jones, B.T.: Facebook: a blessing or a curse for grocery stores? Int. J. Retail. Distrib. Manage. 45(12), 1242–1259 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jin, S.: The potential of social media for luxury brand management. Mark. Intell. Plann. 30(7), 687–699 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Champoux, V., Durgee, J., McGlynn, L.: Corporate Facebook pages: when “fans” attack”. J. Bus. Strategy 33(2), 22–30 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lee, H., Han, J., Suh, Y.: Gift or threat? An examination of voice of the customer: the case of MyStarbucksIdea.com. Electron. Commer. Res. Appl. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2014.02.001 (2014)
  23. 23.
    Smith, A.: The value co-destruction process: a customer resource perspective. Eur. J. Mark. 47(11/12), 1889–1909 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Leeflang, P.S.H., Verhoef, P.C., Dahlström, P., Freundt, T.: Challenges and solutions for marketing in a digital era. Eur. Manag. J. 32, 1–12 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Verhoef, P., Beckers, S., van Doorn, J.: Understand the perils of co-creation. Harvard Bus. Rev. 91(9), 28–32 (2013)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kozinets, R.V.: The field behind the screen: using netnography for marketing research in online communities. J. Mark. Res. 39, 61–72, 62 (2002)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hsieh, H., Shannon, S.: Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual. Health. Res. 15(9), 1277–1288, 1278 (2005)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Miles, M., Huberman, A.: Qualitative Data Analysis: a Sourcebook of New Methods. Sage, London (1984)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Brodie, R., Ilic, A., Juric, B., Hollebeek, L.: Consumer engagement in a virtual brand community: an exploratory analysis. J. Bus. Res. 66(1), 105–114 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kimmel, A.: Connecting With Consumers: marketing for New Marketplace Realities. University Press, Oxford (2010)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    O’Cass, A., Viet Ngo, L.: Achieving customer satisfaction in services firms via branding capability and customer empowerment. J. Serv. Mark. 25(7), 489–496 (2011)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Füller, J., Mühlbacher, H., Matzler, K., Jawecki, G.: Consumer empowerment through internet-based co-creation. J. Manage. Inf. Syst. 26(3), 71–102 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Einwiller, S., Steilen, S.: Handling complaints on social network sites—an analysis of complaints and complaint responses on Facebook and Twitter pages of large US companies. Public Relat. Rev. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2014.11.012 (2015)
  34. 34.
    Constantinides, E., Fountain, S.: Web 2.0: conceptual foundations and marketing issues. J. Dir., Data. Digital. Mark. Pract. 9(3), 231–244 (2008)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Université des MascareignesPamplemoussesMauritius

Personalised recommendations