Advertisement

Suppression of Artifacts for Mobile ICG Using Nonlinear Adaptive Algorithms

  • Madhavi MallamEmail author
  • A. GuruvaReddy
  • B. JanakiRamaiah
  • B. Ramesh Reddy
  • M. K. Lingamurthy
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 862)

Abstract

Impedance cardiography (ICG) is advantageous to identify various heart diseases. In recent times, mobile ICG has grabbed the attention of researchers and analysts for real-time supervision and automatic diagnosis. However, the attainment of ICG’s survey system was degraded due to many interrupts created by subject movement, which paves to wrong diagnosis. Several attempts have been performed to abolish the noise from clinical ICG signal using distinct digital signal processing techniques. Those approaches are not directly synced to be used for the mobile ICG environment and regular noises. Basically, motion artifact still is an open problem in mobile ICG. In this paper, an advanced process of adaptive artifact elimination proposed through impedance cardiography (ICG) signals. This is a composite exemplary based on wavelets and adaptive filter. The prime aspect of this methodology is the realization of adaptive noise canceller (ANC) without any reference signal. In the real-time medical environment during critical conditions due to heartbeat disorders, the filter coefficients become negative. This convergence unbalance leads to low filtering capability. In order to solve this issue, one may incorporate NN adaptive algorithms in the suggested ANC. To enhance the attainment of ANC, error normalization is adapted to change filter coefficients automatically. Again, in order to minimize computational complexity and to avoid overlapping of data samples at the input stage of the filter, a hybrid version of nonnegative and sign sign-based algorithms is considered for implementation. The resulting hybrid versions are exponential normalized nonnegative least mean square (eN3LMS) algorithm, exponential normalized nonnegative sign regressor LMS (eN3SRLMS) algorithm, exponential normalized nonnegative sign error LMS (eN3SELMS) algorithm, and exponential normalized nonnegative sign sign LMS (eN3SSLMS) algorithm. Finally, various ANCs are developed using these algorithms, and attainment measures are calculated and compared. Several implemented ANCs are verified on real impedance cardiogram signals.

Keywords

Nonnegative algorithm Remote healthcare artifact canceller Cardiovascular issues Impedance cardiogram 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by Lakireddy Bali Reddy College of Engineering, Mylavaram. So I would like to express my sincere thanks to our Management, Principal and Dean R&D, who provided insight and encouragement that greatly assisted this research work.

References

  1. 1.
    Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics, American Heart Association (2015)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    World Health Organization Fact Sheets on Cardiovascular Diseases, World Health Organization, Fact sheet N317, January (2015)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    H.H. Woltjer, H.J. Bogaard, P.M.J.M. de Vries, The technique of impedance cardiography. Eur. Heart J. 18(9), 1396–1403 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    J.H. Nagel, L.Y. Shyu, S.P. Reddy, B.E. Hurwitz, P.M. McCabe, N. Schneiderman, New signal processing techniques for improved precession of non invasive impedance cardiography. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 17, 517–534 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    X. Wang, H.H. Sun, J.M.V.D. Water, An advanced signal processing technique for impedance cardiography. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 42(2), 224–230 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    A. Scherhag, J.J. Kaden, E. Kentschke, T. Sueselbeck, M. Borggrefe, Comparison of impedance cardiography and thermodilution derived measurement of stroke volume and cardiac output at rest and during exercise testing. Cardiovasc. Drugs Ther. 19, 141–147 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    B.B. Sramek, Electrical bioimpedance. Med. Electron. 14, 95–103 (1983)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    M. Muzi, T.J. Ebert, F.E. Tristani, D.C. Jeutter, J.A. Barney, J.J. Smith, Determination of cardiac output using ensemble-averaged impedance cardiograms. J. Appl. Physiol. 58, 200–205 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    W.G. Kubicek, J.N. Karnegis, R.P. Patterson, D.A. Witsoe, R.H. Mattson, Development and evaluation of an impedance cardiography output system. Aerosp. Med. 37, 1208–1212 (1966)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    W.G. Kubicek, F.J. Kottke, M.U. Ramos, The Minnesota impedance cardiograph theory and applications. Biomed. Eng. 9, 410–416 (1974)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Health in 2015: from millennium development goals to sustainable development goals, World Health Organization (2015)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Madhavi Mallam
    • 1
    Email author
  • A. GuruvaReddy
    • 2
  • B. JanakiRamaiah
    • 3
  • B. Ramesh Reddy
    • 1
  • M. K. Lingamurthy
    • 1
  1. 1.Lakireddy Bali Reddy College of EngineeringMylavaramIndia
  2. 2.DVR & Dr. HS MIC College of TechnologyKanchikacherlaIndia
  3. 3.PVP Siddhartha Institute of TechnologyVijayawadaIndia

Personalised recommendations