Advertisement

Methods to Monitor Resources and Logistic Planning at Project Sites

  • Pradeep Reddy Challa
  • Bibhuti Bhusan Das
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering book series (LNCE, volume 25)

Abstract

Construction projects are unique and complex in nature. Various resources such as men, material, plant and machinery, capital, information, space, time, and above all local infrastructure are involved in the construction activity. Hence, controlling and monitoring the flow of resources plays a vital role in the timely completion of the project contributing to reduced delays leading to time and cost optimization. Productivity analysis of transit mixer, workmen have been done through data collected from a commercial project and suggestions to improve the same have been proposed. Logistics of two different sites one with onsite storage and other with offsite storage have been studied and recommendations to improve the logistics are provided. Some of the methods to monitor the resources on site have been proposed, which can be used without any hindrances at the construction project sites. Further, based on planned resources, a simplified logistics planning template and labour productivity monitoring data sheet which can be updated based on project’s progress is developed that can be used with ease at project site considering all the necessary factors.

Keywords

Resources Productivity Monitoring Logistics Transit mixer 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are very thankful to Wipro IT SEZ, Bengaluru for providing appropriate data for carrying out this study.

References

  1. 1.
    Durdyev, S., Ismail, S., & Kandymov, N. (2018). Structural equation model of the factors affecting construction labor productivity. ASCE. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gurmu, A. T. (2018). Construction materials management practices enhancing labour productivity in multi-storey building projects. International Journal of Construction Management.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2018.1462447.
  3. 3.
    Thomas, H. R., & Sanvido, V. E. (2000). Role of fabricator in labor productivity. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 126(5), 358–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Choure, S. R., & Apte, M. R. (2015). On-site material management. International Journal of Engineering Sciences & Research Technology. ISSN: 2277-9655.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Navarrete, G. (1999). In the palm of your hand: Digital assistant aid in data collection. Journal of Management Engineering, 15(4), 43–45.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ward, M. J., Thorpe, A., & Price, A. D. F. (2003). SHERPA: Mobile wireless data capture for piling works. Computer Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 18(4), 299–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Leung, S.-W., Mak, S., & Lee, B. L. P. (2008). Using a real-time integrated communication system to monitor the progress and quality of construction works. Automation in Construction, 17(6), 749–757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kim, C., Kim, H., Ryu, J., & Kim, C. (2011). Ubiquitous sensor network for construction material monitoring. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. ASCE.  https://doi.org/10.1061/_asce_co.1943-7862.0000257.
  9. 9.
    Durdyev, S., & Mbachu, J. (2011). On-site labor productivity of New Zealand construction industry: Key constraints and improvement measures. Australasian Journal of Construction Economics and Building, 11(3), 18–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringNational Institute of Technology KarnatakaSurathkal, MangaloreIndia

Personalised recommendations