Advertisement

Combined Effect of Marine Environment and pH on the Impedance of Reinforced Concrete Studied by Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy

  • Sharan Kumar Goudar
  • Bibhuti Bhusan DasEmail author
  • S. B. Arya
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering book series (LNCE, volume 25)

Abstract

In the present investigation, behavior of OPC and fly ash based concretes were assessed by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) technique after exposing the samples to the marine environment in combination with five pH levels (1, 4, 7, 10, and 13). Three different dosages of fly ash (15, 25, and 35%) were used to produce fly ash based concretes. After 90 days of exposure to the aggressive environment, the OPC and fly ash based concretes were tested for impedance analysis and corrosion resistance by electrochemical studies. For the equivalent electrical circuit in EIS study, a total of four electrical circuits were tried for the possible best fit of obtained Nyquist plots. The equivalent electrical circuits proposed by previous researchers failed to provide the best fit for the obtained Nyquist plots. A new equivalent electrical circuit is being proposed in this study which will provide the possible best fit of Nyquist plots when the concrete is being exposed to acidic and alkaline marine environment. It is observed that the pH of the marine environment has a decisive influence on the impedance of reinforced concrete. As the acidity of marine environment reduces to pH 1, the impedance of OPC and fly ash based concrete reduced significantly due to the severe deterioration of concrete composites especially because of acid attack and Cl ions migration. However, in the case of alkaline nature of the marine environment (pH 13), there was comparably less deterioration of concrete composites which reflected in higher impedance values. The higher dosage of fly ash addition has led to substantial improvement in concrete impedance and also lower corrosion rate.

Keywords

Corrosion resistance Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy Fly ash pH 

References

  1. 1.
    Ismail, M., & Ohtsu, M. (2006). Corrosion rate of ordinary and high-performance concrete subjected to chloride attack by AC impedance spectroscopy. Construction and Building Materials, 20, 458–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bassuoni, M. T., & Nehdi, M. L. (2007). Resistance of self-consolidating concrete to sulfuric acid attack with consecutive pH reduction. Cement and Concrete Research, 37, 1070–1084.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zhu, Y., Zhang, H., Zhang, Z., & Yao, Y (2017). Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) of hydration process and drying shrinkage for cement paste with W/C of 0.25 affected by high range water reducer. Construction and Building Materials, 131, 536–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Triana, V., Lizarazo-Marriaga, J., & Flórez, J. O. (2013). Steel corrosion assessment by electrochemical impedance on metakaolin blended mortars. Material Research, 16, 1457–1464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Broomfield, J. P. (2006). Corrosion of steel in concrete: understanding, investigation and repair. CRC Press.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Christensen, B. J., Coverdale, T., Olson, R. A., Ford, S. J., Garboczi, E. J., Jennings, H. M., et al. (1994). Impedance spectroscopy of hydrating cement-based materials: measurement, interpretation, and application. Journal of the American Ceramic Society, 77, 2789–2804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Xie, P., Gu, P., Xu, Z., & Beaudoin, J. J. (1993). A rationalized AC impedence model for microstructural characterization of hydrating cement systems. Cement and Concrete Research, 23, 359–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gu, P., Xie, P., Beaudoin, J. J., & Brousseau, R. (1992). AC impedance spectroscopy (I): A new equivalent circuit model for hydrated Portland cement paste. Cement and Concrete Research, 22, 833–840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ribeiro, D. V, & Abrantes, J. C. C. (2016). Application of electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) to monitor the corrosion of reinforced concrete: A new approach. Construction and Building Materials, 111, 98–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jain, J., & Neithalath, N. (2011). Electrical impedance analysis based quantification of microstructural changes in concretes due to non-steady state chloride migration. Materials Chemistry and Physics, 129, 569–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    da Silva, F. G., & Liborio, J. B. L. (2006). A study of steel bar reinforcement corrosion in concretes with SF and SRH using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. Material Research, 9, 209–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gonzalez, J. A., Lopez, W., & Rodriguez, P. (1993). Effects of moisture availability on corrosion kinetics of steel embedded in concrete. Corrosion, 49, 1004–1010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Montemor, M. F., Simoes, A. M. P., & Ferreira, M. G. S. (2003). Chloride-induced corrosion on reinforcing steel: From the fundamentals to the monitoring techniques. Cement and Concrete Composites, 25, 491–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Christensen, B. J., Mason, T. O., & Jennings, H. M. (1992). Influence of silica fume on the early hydration of Portland cements using impedance spectroscopy. Journal of the American Ceramic Society, 75, 939–945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sagüés, A. A., Kranc, S. C., & Moreno, E. I. (1995). The time-domain response of a corroding system with constant phase angle interfacial component: Application to steel in concrete. Corrosion Science, 37, 1097–1113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Feliu, V., González, J. A., Andrade, C., Feliu, S. (1998). Equivalent circuit for modelling the steel-concrete interface. I. Experimental evidence and theoretical predictions. Corrosion Science, 40, 975–993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Poursaee, A., Laurent, A., & Hansson, C. M. (2010). Corrosion of steel bars in OPC mortar exposed to NaCl, MgCl2 and CaCl2: Macro-and micro-cell corrosion perspective. Cement and Concrete Research, 40, 426–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    G3-89, A. (2010). Standard practice for conventions applicable to electrochemical measurements in corrosion testing.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    G106, A. (2010). Standard practice for verification of algorithm and equipment for electrochemical impedance measurements. Google Scholar.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sharan Kumar Goudar
    • 1
  • Bibhuti Bhusan Das
    • 1
    Email author
  • S. B. Arya
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringNational Institute of Technology KarnatakaSurathkal, MangaloreIndia
  2. 2.Department of Metallurgical and Materials EngineeringNational Institute of Technology KarnatakaSurathkal, MangaloreIndia

Personalised recommendations