Effect of Supplementary Cementitious Materials on Mechanical Properties and Thermal Conductivity of Concretes and Masonry Blocks

  • Kudva P. LaxmanEmail author
  • Rudresh M. Suralikerimath
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering book series (LNCE, volume 25)


With rapid population growth and consequential urbanization, there have been concerns on environmental pollution and rapid depletion of natural resources. This has driven the construction industry to drift its practices from conventional to something sustainable. The reluctance in utilizing modern techniques, methods in construction, mediocre importance to sustainable materials, lack of knowledge and confidence in utilizing the industrial by-products at different stages of construction especially in the residential sector are some among many reasons for below-par success. The use of industrial by-products in scientific proportions, in fact not only contributes towards improving strength and durability aspects but also improves the thermal properties of the material leading to better comfort and lesser energy demand. The present study attempts to identify alternative concretes which are nothing but conventional concrete incorporated with supplementary cementitious materials and M-sand, evaluate for the strength parameters such as compressive strength, split tensile strength and flexural strength. Further, the study also aims to determine the thermal conductivity values for such alternative concretes using axial heat flow method and ascertain the effect of density on thermal conductivity values. The results are hence interpreted as a mean to choose the best material for construction that provides thermal comfort and reduce the energy consumption by improving energy efficiency of the building.


Alternative concretes Thermal conductivity U-value R-value 


  1. 1.
    Ahn, C. R., & Lee, S. (2012). Importance of operational efficiency to achieve energy efficiency and exhaust emission reduction of construction operations. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 139(4), 404–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Penttala, V. (1997). Concrete and sustainable development. ACI Materials Journal, 94(5), 409–416.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yesilata, B., Bulut, H., & Turgut, P. (2011). Experimental study on thermal behavior of a building structure using rubberized exterior-walls. Energy and Buildings, 43(2), 393–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nayak, J. K., & Prajapati, J. A. (2006). Handbook on energy conscious buildings. Prepared Under the Interactive R & D Project, (3/4), 03.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nath, P., & Sarker, P. (2011). Effect of fly ash on the durability properties of high strength concrete. Procedia Engineering, 14, 1149–1156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gadpalliwar, S. K., Deotale, R. S., & Narde, A. R. (2013). To study the partial replacement of cement by GGBS & RHA and natural sand by quarry sand in concrete. IOSR-JMCE, 2(11), 69–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Joe, M. A., Rajesh, A. M., Brightson, P., & Prem Anand, M. (2013). Experimental investigation on the effect of M-sand in high performance concrete. American Journal of Engineering Research, 2(12), 46–51.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kim, K. H., Jeon, S. E., Kim, J. K., & Yang, S. (2003). An experimental study on thermal conductivity of concrete. Cement and Concrete Research, 33(3), 363–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Uysal, H., Demirboğa, R., Şahin, R., & Gül, R. (2004). The effects of different cement dosages, slumps, and pumice aggregate ratios on the thermal conductivity and density of concrete. Cement and Concrete Research, 34(5), 845–848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringManipal Institute of TechnologyManipalIndia

Personalised recommendations