Advertisement

An Effect of NaOH Molarity on Fly Ash—Metakaolin-Based Self-Compacting Geopolymer Concrete

  • B. R. ArunEmail author
  • P. S. Nagaraja
  • J. M. Srishaila
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering book series (LNCE, volume 25)

Abstract

The study aims to investigate the workability and mechanical properties of fly ash- and metakaolin-based self-compacting geopolymer concrete (SCGC) on different NaOH molarities. The mix proportion of SCGC was arrived by trial and error method. Workability properties like slump flow, T50 slump flow, V-funnel, and L-box and mechanical properties such as compressive, split tensile, and flexural strength were tested at 7, 28, and 56 days. The specimens were cured at 70 °C for 24 h in oven followed by ambient curing till the respective days of testing. The experiments were carried out by varying the mass fraction of fly ash with metakaolin by 0, 10, 20, and 30% by mass for all the molarities like 8, 10, and 12 M, for a constant binder content of 400 kg/m3. The fluid-to-binder (F/B) ratio of 0.47 by mass and superplasticizer (S.P) dosage of 3% was used for all the molarities, and extra water content was varied accordingly. The experimental result revealed that workability parameters like slump flow, L-box ratios were decreased, and V-funnel flow time and T50 cm flow time increased with the increase of metakaolin replacement level and as well with increase in molarities, and the entire test was done as prescribed by EFNARC guidelines. The results of compressive, split tensile, flexural strength reduced with addition of metakaolin in fly ash content, and however, it increased with increase in morality.

Keywords

Self-compacting geopolymer concrete (SCGC) Fly Ash (FA) Metakaolin (MK) Molarities (M) Manufacture sand (M-Sand) Superplasticizer (S.P) Sodium hydroxide (NaOH) 

References

  1. 1.
    Gartner, E. (2004). Industrially interesting approaches to ‘low-CO2’ cements. Cement and Concrete Research, 34, 1489–1498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Malhotra, V. M. (1999). Making concrete ‘greener’ with fly ash. ACI Concrete International, 21, 61–66.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    McCaffrey, R. (2002). Climate change and cement industry (pp. 15–19). Global Cement and Lime Magazine: Environmental special Issue.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kumar M. P. (2007). Cements and concrete mixtures for sustainability. In Proceedings of Structural Engineering World Congress. Bangalore, India.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Villa, C., Pecina, E. T., Torres, R., & Gomez, L. (2010). Geopolymer synthesis using alkaline activation of natural zeolites. Construction and Building Materials, 24, 2084–2090.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kumutha, V. R., & Vishnuram, B. G. (2010). Effect of types of curing on strength of geopolymer concrete. International Journal of Physical the Sciences, 5(9), 1419–1423.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Memon, F. A., Nuruddin, M. F., & Shafiq, N. (2013). Effect of silica fume on the fresh and hardened properties of flyash-based self-compacting geopolymer concrete. International Journal of Minerals, Metallurgy and Materials, 20(2), 205.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12613-013-0714-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kong, D. L. K., Sanjayan, J. G., & Crentsil, K. S. (2007). Comparative performance of geopolymers made with metakaolin and fly ash after exposure to elevated temperature. Cement and Concrete Research, 37(12), 1583–1589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sashidhar, C., Guru Jawahar, J., Neelima, C., & Pavan Kumar, D. (2015). Fresh and strength properties of self-compacting geopolymer concrete using manufactured sand. International Journal of Chem Tech Research, 08(7):183–190. ISSN: 0974-4290.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    IS 3812: 1981. Specifications for fly ash for use as pozzolana and admixture. First Revision-Jan.1999, Bureau of Indian Standards, India.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    IS 383: 1970. Specification for coarse and fine aggregate from natural sources for concrete. Second Revision, Reaffirmed-1997, Bureau of Indian Standards, India.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    EFNARC. 2002. Specification and guidelines for self-compacting concrete. UK, p. 32.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    IS 516-1959. Specification for testing mechanical properties of concrete.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • B. R. Arun
    • 1
    Email author
  • P. S. Nagaraja
    • 2
  • J. M. Srishaila
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringUVCEBangaloreIndia
  2. 2.Faculty of Civil EngineeringUVCEBangaloreIndia
  3. 3.Civil Engineering DepartmentRYMECBallariIndia

Personalised recommendations