Advertisement

Research on Resilient Reinforced Concrete Building Structural System

  • Susumu KonoEmail author
  • Ryo Kuwabara
  • Fuhito Kitamura
  • Eko Yuniarsyah
  • Hidekazu Watanabe
  • Tomohisa Mukai
  • David Mukai
Conference paper

Abstract

Two real scale five-storey reinforced concrete frame buildings were tested in BRI in order to evaluate damage of reinforced concrete structural members such as beams, columns, and walls for strength-based design buildings. A series of experimental works show that secondary RC walls could have improved seismic performance for damage reduction by changing configuration and rebar arrangement.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was carried out by a joint study of National Technology Development Project of MLIT “Development of function sustaining technologies for buildings used as Disaster Prevention Bases” (2013~2016) and Priority Research Program of BRI Development on Seismic Design Method for Building with Post Earthquake Functional Use” (2013~2015). The efforts in measuring concrete cracking by Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo University of Science and Tohoku University and seven participating companies are gratefully acknowledged. A part of this study was conducted as Scientific Research A (PI: Susumu Kono) of JSPS Grant-in-Aid program. Some financial support was also granted by the World Research Hub Initiative of the Institute of Innovative Research and the Collaborative Research Project of Materials and Structures Laboratory at Tokyo Institute of Technology.

References

  1. Architectural Institute of Japan. (2004). Guidelines for Performance Evaluation of Earthquake Resistant Reinforced Concrete Buildings (Draft).Google Scholar
  2. CEB-FIP. (1978). Model code for concrete structures, 15.2.3 Limit states of cracking, pp. 156–160.Google Scholar
  3. Ciampi, V. et al. (1982). Analytical model for concrete anchorages of reinforcing bars under generalized excitations. Berkeley: University of California. (Report No. UCB/EERC-82/23).Google Scholar
  4. Fukuyama, H. (2015). Static loading test on a full scale five story reinforced concrete building utilizing wing walls for damage reduction. C-2, pp. 361–362. Summaries of technical papers of Annual Meeting Architectural Institute of Japan.Google Scholar
  5. ITOCHU Techno Solutions Corporation. (2016). Science and Engineering Systems Division: Final user’s manual.Google Scholar
  6. Izumo, J., Shima, H., & Okamura, H. (1987). Analytical model for reinforced concrete panel elements subjected to in-plane forces. Concrete Research and Technology, 25(9), 107–120.Google Scholar
  7. JBDPA (The Japan Building Disaster Prevention Association). (2015). Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit.Google Scholar
  8. Kabeyasawa, T., Mukai, T., & Fukuyama, H., et al. (2016). A full scale static loading test on five story reinforced concrete building utilizing columns with wing walls. Journal of Structural and Construction Engineering, Transactions of AIJ, 81(720), 313–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kabeyasawa, T., Mukai, T., Fukuyama, H., Suwada, H., & Kato, H. (2017). Full-scale static loading test on a five story reinforced concrete building. In 16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, January 9–13, Paper No. 1242. Santiago: Chile.Google Scholar
  10. Kitamura, F. (2017). Damage evaluation of five-story building by nonlinear finite element analysis. Master thesis of Tokyo Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
  11. Kono, S., Kitamura, F., Yuniarsyia, E., Watanabe, H., Mukai, T., & Mukai, D. (2017) Efforts to develop resilient reinforced concrete building structures in Japan. In Proceedings of the Fourth Conference on Smart Monitoring, Assessment and Rehabilitation of Civil Structures, September 2017, pp. 13–15, Paper ID #KN30. Zurich, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  12. Maeda, M., Nakano, Y., & Lee, K. (2004). Post-Earthquake Damage evaluation for R/C buildings based on residual seismic capacity. In Proceedings of 13 World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Paper ID 1179.Google Scholar
  13. MLIT (Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transportation and Tourism). (2015). The 2015 guidelines of structural design technology of buildings.Google Scholar
  14. Naganuma, K. (1995). Stress–strain relationship for concrete under triaxial compression. Journal of Structural and Construction Engineering, Transactions of AIJ, 474, 163–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Sato, Y., & Naganuma, K. (2011). Crack width analysis using smeared-crack-based fem: Part 8. C-2, pp. 241–242. Summaries of tech. papers of Annual Meeting Architectural Institute of Japan.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Susumu Kono
    • 1
    Email author
  • Ryo Kuwabara
    • 1
  • Fuhito Kitamura
    • 1
  • Eko Yuniarsyah
    • 1
  • Hidekazu Watanabe
    • 2
  • Tomohisa Mukai
    • 2
  • David Mukai
    • 3
  1. 1.Institute of Innovative Research, Tokyo Institue of TechnologyTokyoJapan
  2. 2.Building Research InstituteTsukubaJapan
  3. 3.University of WyomingLaramieUSA

Personalised recommendations