Advertisement

Validation of the PARC_CL 2.0 Crack Model by the Cyclic Tests of 1/13-Scale Nuclear Containment Structures

  • Beatrice BellettiEmail author
  • Alessandro Stocchi
  • Francesca Vecchi
Conference paper

Abstract

The possibility of predicting and evaluating structural performances is a key feature in the modern performance-based design. PARC_CL 2.0 is a physical approach to the modeling of reinforced concrete structures. A multilayer shell approach is applied to the modeling of a 1/13 reinforced concrete vessel subjected to cyclic loading. An assessment of the predictive capacity of the proposed model is analyzed through numerical versus experimental data comparison. Local and global parameters can be assessed with adequate accuracy, although there is room for improvements.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge Prof. Thomas Hsu (University of Houston) for his remarkable help, and Prof. Chiun-Lin Wu (NCREE), Prof. Shyh-Jiann Hwang (National Taiwan University) and all the NCREE staff for providing experimental data and for their precious collaboration.

References

  1. Belletti, B., Walraven, J. C., Trapani, F. (2015a). Evaluation of compressive membrane action effects on punching shear resistance of reinforced concrete slabs. Engineering Structures, 95, 25–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Belletti, B., Pimentel, M., Scolari, M., & Walraven, J. C. (2015b). Safety assessment of punching shear failure according to the level of approximation approach. Structural Concrete, 16(3), 366–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Belletti, B., Scolari, M., & Vecchi, F. (2017a). PARC_CL 2.0 crack model for NLFEA of reinforced concrete structures under cyclic loadings. Computers & Structures, 191, 165–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Belletti, B., Stocchi, A., Scolari, M., & Vecchi, F. (2017b). Validation of the PARC_CL 2.0 crack model for the assessment of the nonlinear behaviour of RC structures subjected to seismic action: SMART 2013 shaking table test simulation. Engineering Structures, 150, 759–773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Belletti, B., Scolari, M., Almeida, J. P., & Beyer K. (2016) Validation of NLFEA of reinforced concrete walls under bidirectional loading. In Italian Concrete Days—Giornate AICAP 2016 Congresso CTE, Roma, Italia, October 27–28. https://infoscience.epfl.ch/record/223004.
  6. Belletti, B., Damoni, C., Scolari, M., Stocchi, A. (2014a). Simulation of RC walls seismic behaviour with shell elements and PARC_CL modelling. In Second European Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, Istanbul (Turkey), August 25–29. www.eaee.org/Media/Default/2ECCES/2ecces_ss/3139.pdf.
  7. Belletti, B., Damoni, C., Hendriks, M. A. N., & De Boer, A. (2014b). Analytical and numerical evaluation of the design shear resistance of reinforced concrete slabs. Structural Concrete, 15(3), 317–330.  https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.201300069.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Belletti, B., Damoni, C., Gasperi, A. (2013). Modeling approaches suitable for pushover analyses of RC structural wall buildings. Engineering Structures, 57, 327–338.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.09.023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Damoni, C., Belletti, B., Esposito, R. (2014). Numerical prediction of the response of a squat shear wall subjected to monotonic loading. European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering, 18(7), 754–769CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dashti, F., Dhakal, R. P., Pampanin, S. (2014). Simulation of out-of-plane instability in rectangular RC structural walls. In Second European Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, Istanbul (Turkey), August 25–29. www.eaee.org/Media/Default/2ECEES/2ecces_ss/392.pdf.
  11. Gambarova, P. G. (1983). Sulla trasmissione del taglio in elementi bidimensionali piani di c.a. fessurati. In Proceedings of Giornate AICAP (141–156) (in Italian).Google Scholar
  12. Giuriani, E. (1981). On the effective axial stiffness of a bar in cracked concrete. In P. Bartos (ed.) Bond in concrete, Department of Civil Engineering, College of Technology, Paisley, Scotland, (pp. 107–126).Google Scholar
  13. Grammatikou, S., Biskinis, D., & Fardis, M. N. (2015). Strength, deformation capacity and failure modes of RC walls under cyclic loading. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 13(11), 3277–3300.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-015-9762-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hendriks, M. A. N., Uijl, J. A, De Boer, A., Feenstra, P. H., Belletti, B., Damoni, C. (2012). Guidelines for non-linear finite element analyses of concrete structures. Rijkswaterstaat Technisch Document (RTD), Rijkswaterstaat Centre for Infrastructure, RTD:1016:2012.Google Scholar
  15. Hibbit, H. D., Karlsson, B. I., & Sorensen, E. P. (2012) ABAQUS user manual, version 6.12. Simulia, Providence, RI.Google Scholar
  16. Hsu, T., Wu, C., & Lin, J. (2013). Infrastructure systems for nuclear energy. Chichester: Wiley.  https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118536254.ch25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Labbé, P. (2013). EDF experience on design and construction of nuclear power plants on seismic isolation systems. In 1st Conference on the Technological Innovations in Nuclear Civil Engineering: Construction and Strengthening of Nuclear Buildings, TINCE 2013 (pp. 29–31), Paris (France), October 28–31.Google Scholar
  18. Luu, C. H., Mo, Y. L., & Hsu, T. T. C. (2017). Development of CSMM-based shell element for reinforced concrete structures. Engineering Structures, 132, 778–790.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.11.064.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Martinelli, P., & Filippou, F. C. (2009). Simulation of the shaking table test of a seven-story shear wall building. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 38(5), 587–607.  https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Menegotto, M., & Pinto, P. E. (1973). Method of analysis for cyclically loaded RC plane fames including changes in geometry and non-elastic behavior of elements under combined normal force and bending. In Proceedings of IABSE Symposium on the Resistance and Ultimate Deformability of Structures Acted on by Well Defined Repeated Loads (pp. 15–22) Preliminary Rep., Lisbon, Portugal.Google Scholar
  21. Richard, B., Cherubini, S., Voldoire, F., Charbonnel, P. E., Chaudat, T., Abouri, S., et al. (2015). SMART 2013: Experimental and numerical assessment of the dynamic behavior by shaking table tests of an asymmetrical reinforced concrete structure subjected to high intensity ground motions. Engineering Structures, 109, 99–116.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.11.029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Riva, P., Meda, A., & Giuriani, E. (2003). Cyclic behaviour of a full scale RC structural wall. Engineering Structures, 25(6), 835–845.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0141-0296(03)00020-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rosso, A., Almeida, J. P., & Beyer, K. (2016). Stability of thin reinforced concrete walls under cyclic loads: State-of-the-art and new experimental findings. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 14(2), 455–484.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-015-9827-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Vecchio, F. J., & Collins, M. P. (1993). Compression response of cracked reinforced concrete. ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering, 119(12), 3590–3610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wu, C.L., et al. (2018) Reversed cyclic tests of 1/13 scale cylindrical concrete containment structures. National Center for Earthquake Engineering, Report No. NCREE-18-001, Taipei, Taiwan.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Beatrice Belletti
    • 1
    Email author
  • Alessandro Stocchi
    • 1
  • Francesca Vecchi
    • 1
  1. 1.Dipartimento di Ingegneria e ArchitetturaUniversità di ParmaParmaItaly

Personalised recommendations