Advertisement

Seismic Performance of Rehabilitated RC Columns Using Material Testing Integrated (MTI) Simulation

  • Donghyuk Jung
  • Bassem AndrawesEmail author
Conference paper

Abstract

There is growing interest in the seismic application of shape memory alloys (SMAs) in concrete structures. However, for the seismic performance of such new class of materials with complex thermomechanical behavior to be fully understood, more advanced simulation tools are required.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF) through its Faculty Early Career Development (CAREER) program under Award No. 1055640, and the authors are grateful for the support.

References

  1. American Association of State Highway Officials (AASHO). (1969). Standard specifications for highway bridges (10th ed.). Washington DC.Google Scholar
  2. Andrawes, B., & Shin, M. (2008). Seismic retrofit of bridge columns using innovative wrapping technique. In Proceedings of Structures Congress (pp. 1–10). Vancouver, Canada.Google Scholar
  3. Braga, F., Gigliotti, R., Laterza, M., D’Amato, M., & Kunnath, S. (2012). Modified steel bar model incorporating bond-slip for seismic assessment of concrete structures. Journal of Structural Engineering, 138, 1342–1350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). (2013). Seismic design criteria, Version 1.7. Sacramento, CA.Google Scholar
  5. Chen, Q. (2015). Experimental testing and constitutive modeling of concrete confined with shape memory alloys. Doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar
  6. Chen, Q., & Andrawes, B. (2014). Monotonic and cyclic experimental testing of concrete confined with shape memory alloy spirals. In Proceedings of 10th US National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Anchorage, Alaska.Google Scholar
  7. Daudey, X., & Filiatrault, A. (2000). Seismic evaluation and retrofit with steel jackets of reinforced concrete bridge piers detailed with lap-splices. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 27, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gamble, W. L., Hawkins, N. M., & Kaspar, I. I. (1996). Seismic retrofitting experience and experiments in Illinois. In Proceedings of 5th National Workshop on Bridge Research in Progress. Buffalo, NY: National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research (NCEER), State University of New York.Google Scholar
  9. Giuffrè, A., & Pinto, P. E. (1970). Reinforced concrete behavior under strong repeated loadings. Giornale del Genio Civile, 5, 391–408.Google Scholar
  10. Haroun, M. A., & Elsanadedy, H. M. (2005). Fiber-reinforced plastic jackets for ductility enhancement of reinforced concrete bridge columns with poor lap-splice detailing. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 10, 749–757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kent, D. C., & Park, R. (1971). Flexural members with confined concrete. Journal of the Structural Division.Google Scholar
  12. Kwon, O. S., Nakata, N., Elnashai, A., & Spencer, B. (2005). A framework for multi-site distributed simulation and application to complex structural systems. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 9, 741–753.Google Scholar
  13. Menegotto, M., & Pinto, P. E. (1973). Method of analysis for cyclically loaded reinforced concrete plane frames including changes in geometry and inelastic behavior of elements under combined normal force and bending. In IABSE Symposium on Resistance and Ultimate Deformability of Structures Acted on by Well-Defined Repeated Loads, Final report, Lisbon.Google Scholar
  14. Nesheli, K. N., & Meguro, K. (2006). Seismic retrofitting of earthquake-damaged concrete columns by lateral pre-tensioning of FRP belts. In Proceedings of 8th US National Conference on Earthquake Engineering. El Cerrito, CA.Google Scholar
  15. Priestley, M. N., Seible, F., Xiao, Y., & Verma, R. (1994a). Steel jacket retrofitting of reinforced concrete bridge columns for enhanced shear strength-part 1: Theoretical considerations and test design. Structural Journal, 91, 394–405.Google Scholar
  16. Priestley, M. N., Seible, F., & Xiao, Y. (1994b). Steel jacket retrofitting of reinforced concrete bridge columns for enhanced shear strength-part 2: Test results and comparison with theory. Structural Journal, 91, 537–551.Google Scholar
  17. Saadatmanesh, H., Ehsani, M. R., & Li, M. W. (1994). Strength and ductility of concrete columns externally reinforced with fiber composite straps. Structural Journal, 91, 434–447.Google Scholar
  18. Saatcioglu, M., & Yalcin, C. (2003). External prestressing concrete columns for improved seismic shear resistance. Journal of Structural Engineering, 129, 1057–1070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Scott, B. D., Park, R., & Priestley, M. J. N. (1982). Stress-strain behavior of concrete confined by overlapping hoops at low and high strain rates. ACI Journal, 79, 13–27.Google Scholar
  20. Shin, M., & Andrawes, B. (2010). Experimental investigation of actively confined concrete using shape memory alloys. Engineering Structures, 32, 656–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Shin, M., & Andrawes, B. (2011). Lateral cyclic behavior of reinforced concrete columns retrofitted with shape memory spirals and FRP wraps. Journal of Structural Engineering, 137, 1282–1290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Shin, M., & Andrawes, B. (2012). Modeling and validation of RC columns seismically retrofitted using shape memory spiral. In Proceedings of Structures Congress (pp. 571–580). Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
  23. Shing, P. B., Nakashima, M., & Bursi, O. S. (1996). Application of pseudodynamic test method to structural research. Earthquake spectra, 12, 29–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Spacone, E., Ciampi, V., & Filippou, F. C. (1996a). Mixed formulation of nonlinear beam finite element. Computers & Structures, 58, 71–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Spacone, E., Filippou, F. C., & Taucer, F. F. (1996b). Fibre beam-column model for non-linear analysis of R/C frames: Part I Formulation. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 25, 711–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Takanashi, K., Udagawa, K., Seki, M., Okada, T., & Tanaka, H. (1975). Nonlinear earthquake response analysis of structures by a computer-actuator on-line system. Bulletin of Earthquake Resistant Structure Research Center, 8, 1–17.Google Scholar
  27. Takanashi, K., & Nakashima, M. (1987). Japanese activities on on-line testing. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 113, 1014–1032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Vamvatsikos, D., & Cornell, C. A. (2002). Incremental dynamic analysis. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 31, 491–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Xiao, Y., & Wu, H. (2003). Retrofit of reinforced concrete columns using partially stiffened steel jackets. Journal of Structural Engineering, 129, 725–732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Yamakawa, T., Banazadeh, M., & Fujikawa, S. (2004). Emergency retrofit of damaged RC columns right after seismic attack using pre-tensioned aramid fiber belts. In Proceedings of 1st Conference on Applications of FRP Composites in Construction and Rehabilitation of Structures.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignUrbanaUSA

Personalised recommendations