Advertisement

Digital Fluoroscopy

  • Euclid Seeram
Chapter

Abstract

Fluoroscopy is an imaging modality that shows anatomical structures and the motion of organs and the movement of contrast media in blood vessels and organs with the goal of obtaining functional information. It has evolved from conventional fluoroscopy recording images on film to current digital fluoroscopy (DF) in which digital dynamic images are obtained and stored in a computer. There are two modes of DF, one that is based on using an image intensifier coupled to a digital imaging chain and one that is based on the use of digital flat-panel detectors (FPDs). The former is being replaced by the latter, which is capable of producing dynamic images that can be displayed and viewed in real time. For this reason, these detectors are sometimes referred to as dynamic FPDs. Two types of dynamic FPDs are currently available for digital fluoroscopy, namely, the cesium iodide amorphous-silicon (CsI a-Si) TFT indirect digital detector and the a-selenium TFT direct digital detector. An important characteristic of these detectors is that they must have high frame rates and fast data transfer rates. Frame rates of 15–30 frames per second (fps) or greater are possible at readout speeds of 30–50 ms. Additionally, dynamic FPDs can operate in at least two readout modes: the fps in continuous X-ray mode and the fps in the pulsed X-ray mode. The overall goal of the latter is to reduce the dose to the patient during the examination.

FPD DF systems offer two approaches to image magnification: (a) electronic magnification (zoom) and (b) binning. With the former approach, there is no increase in spatial resolution, and both original and magnified images have the same signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). Binning has the disadvantage of less spatial resolution because the effective area of each image pixel is four times larger, and it has the advantage of lower data rates and less image mottle than ungrouped pixels. Advantages of FPD DF include distortion-free images, improved contrast resolution, high detective quantum efficiency (DQE), and uniform image quality over the whole displayed rectangular image. The chapter concludes with a brief description of several image post-processing operations specifically for digital fluoroscopy, such as grayscale image manipulation, temporal frame averaging, last image hold, and edge enhancement and a brief overview of digital subtraction angiography (DSA).

References

  1. 1.
    Bushong S. Radiologic science for technologists. 11th ed. St Louis: Elsevier-Mosby; 2017.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bushberg JT, Seibert JA, Leidholdt EM Jr, Boone JM. The essential physics of medical imaging. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2012.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nickoloff EL. Survey of modern fluoroscopy imaging: flat-panel detectors versus image intensifiers and more. Radiographics. 2011;31:591–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Seeram E, Brennan P. Radiation protection in diagnostic X-ray imaging. Burlington, MA: James & Bartlett Learning; 2017.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jones AK, Balter S, Rauch P, Wagner LK. Medical imaging using ionizing radiation: optimization of dose and image quality in fluoroscopy. Med Phys. 2014;41(1):014301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wang J, Blackburn TJ. X-ray image intensifiers for fluoroscopy. Radiographics. 2000;20:1471–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Holmes DR, Laskey WK, et al. Flat-panel detectors in the cardiac catheterization laboratory: revolution or evolution-what are the issues? Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2004;63:324–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lai J, Safavian N, et al. Active pixel TFT arrays for digital fluoroscopy in a-Si:H technology. Mater Res Soc Symp Proc. 2005;862:635–40.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Seeram E, Seeram D. Image postprocessing in digital radiology: a primer for technologists. J Med Imaging Radiat Sci. 2008;39(1):23–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pooley RA, McKinney MI, Miller DA. Digital fluoroscopy. Radiographics. 2001;21:521–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Euclid Seeram
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5
  1. 1.Medical Radiation Sciences University of SydneySydneyAustralia
  2. 2.Medical Radiation Sciences, Faculty of Health SciencesUniversity of SydneySydneyAustralia
  3. 3.Adjunct Associate Professor, Medical Imaging and Radiation SciencesMonash UniversityClaytonAustralia
  4. 4.Adjunct Professor, Faculty of ScienceCharles Sturt UniversityWagga WaggaAustralia
  5. 5.Adjunct Associate Professor, Medical Radiation Sciences, Faculty of HealthUniversity of CanberraBruceAustralia

Personalised recommendations