Conclusion: Paved with Good Intentions?

  • Sallie YeaEmail author


The concluding chapter of the book reiterates its key argument about understanding anti-trafficking not only as an important set of state and non-state responses to the problem of migrant exploitation but also as self-referential discursive and practical formation. By way of illustrating the truth effects of this formation, the chapter illustrates these effects by way of two detailed vignettes. The chapter makes some final reflections on possibilities for a more progressive anti-trafficking movement that engages with the needs and experiences of migrants themselves.


  1. Briones, L. (2008). Beyond trafficking, agency and rights: A capabilities perspective on Filipina experiences of domestic work in Paris and Hong Kong. Wagadu, 5, 50–72.Google Scholar
  2. Butler, J. (2009). Frames of war: When is life grievable? New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  3. Di Tommaso, M. L., Shima, I., Strom, S., & Bettio, F. (2009). As bad as it gets: Well-being deprivation of sexually exploited trafficked women. European Journal of Political Economy, 25(2), 142–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Doezema, J. (2002). Who gets to choose? Coercion, consent and the UN Trafficking Protocol. Gender and Development, 10(1), 20–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Nussbaum, M. (2002). Capabilities and human rights. In P. De Grieff & C. Ciaran (Eds.), Global justice: Transnational politics (pp. 117–150). London and Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  6. Nussbaum, M. (2003). Capabilities as fundamental entitlements: Sen and social justice. Feminist Economics, 9(2–3), 33–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Nussbaum, M. (2004). Promoting women’s capabilities. In L. Benaria & S. Bisnath (Eds.), Global tensions: Challenges and opportunities in the world economy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Sen, A. (1985). Well-being, agency and freedom: The Dewey Lectures 1984. The Journal of Philosophy, 82(4), 169–221.Google Scholar
  9. Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Social InquiryLa Trobe UniversityAlbury-WodongaAustralia

Personalised recommendations