Advertisement

Determinants of Ethics Auditing: Structural Equation Model Approach

  • Sezer Bozkuş Kahyaoglu
  • Bulent Balkan
  • Ozlem Balkan
Chapter
Part of the Accounting, Finance, Sustainability, Governance & Fraud: Theory and Application book series (AFSGFTA)

Abstract

It is generally accepted that behaving ethically is essential to the success of organizations. The failure to behave ethically in the eyes of key stakeholders can impair the health of organizations. This is particularly the case with organizations who are potentially vulnerable to direct consumer action and also the state agencies who provide various services for their citizens. In this paper, we analyze the involvement of internal audit in the provision of assurance in relation to the ethics implementations in organizations. Internal audit is expected to conduct an effective ethical audit as a high priority in a risk-based internal audit planning process which is required by the International Professional Practices Framework (IPPF) of the Institute of Internal Auditors (IIA). The provision of assurance concerning successful implementation of an ethics policy as a contribution to the achievement of organizational objectives is becoming increasingly critical. That’s why, it is examined whether internal audit is ready for responding to this challenge globally. The Common Body of Knowledge (CBOK) data of IIA are used for analyzing the current situation about determinants of ethics auditing all over the world. We propose a structural equation model (SEM) utilizing a worldwide dataset of CBOK data with responses from internal auditors. The determinants of ethics auditing is estimated by using SEM with 20 observed variables loaded to six factors namely, Audit Policy Documents, Auditor Integrity, Audit Policy Documents, Ethics Standards, Ethics Audit, and Corporate Governance. Finally, policy recommendations are made based on empirical findings to add value to internal audit profession and stakeholders.

Keywords

Internal audit Ethics auditing Corporate governance Structural equation model (SEM) 

JEL Codes

M42 M14 C35 

References

  1. Abbott LJ, Parker S, Peter GF (2012) Internal audit assistance and external audit timeliness. Audit: J Pract Theory 31(4):3–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Albrecht WS, Howe KR, Schueler DR, Stocks KD (1988) Evaluating the effectiveness of internal audit departments. Institute of Internal Auditors, Altamonte SpringsGoogle Scholar
  3. Alzeban A, Gwilliam D (2014) Factors affecting the internal audit effectiveness: a survey of the Saudi public sector. J Int Acc Audit Tax 23:74–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ardts J, Jansen P, Van Der Velde M (2001) The breaking in of new employees: effectiveness of socialization tactics and personnel instruments. J Manag Dev 20(2):159–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arena M, Azzone G (2009) Identifying organizational drivers of internal audit effectiveness. Int J Audit 13(1):43–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Böhm F, Bollen LH, Hassink HF (2013) Spotlight on the design of European audit committees: a comparative descriptive study. Int J Audit 17(2):138–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Burnaby P, Howe M, Muehlmann BW (2009) Detecting fraud in the organization: an internal audit perspective. J Forensic Invest Acc 3(1):195–233Google Scholar
  8. Byrne BM (2001) Structural equation modeling with AMOS. Basic concepts, applications and programming. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  9. Byrne BM (2010) Structural equation modelling with AMOS, basic concepts, applications, and programming, 2nd edn. Taylor & Francis GroupGoogle Scholar
  10. Dittenhofer M (2001) Internal auditing effectiveness: an expansion of present methods. Manag Audit J 16:443–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Domingo GM (2005) Trust and dialogue: theoretical approaches to ethics auditing. J Bus Ethics 57:209–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ferell OC, Fraedrick J, Ferell L (2011) Business ethics: ethical decision making and cases. South-Western - Cengage Learning, MasonGoogle Scholar
  13. Francis R, Armstrong A (2003). Ethics as a risk management strategy: the Australian experience. J Bus Ethics 45(4):375–385Google Scholar
  14. García-Marzá D (2005) Trust and dialogue: theoretical approaches to ethics auditing. J Bus Ethics 57(3)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. García-Marzá D (2017) From ethical codes to ethical auditing: an ethical infrastructure for social responsibility communication. Prof Inf 26(2):268–276. http://www.elprofesionaldelainformacion.com/contenidos/2017/mar/13_esp.pdfCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Goodwin J (2004) A comparison of internal audit in the private and public sectors. Manag Audit J 1:640–650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Goodwin J, Teck YY (2001) Two factors affecting internal audit independence and objectivity: evidence from Singapore. Int J Audit 5:107–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Halbouni SS (2015) The role of auditors in preventing, detecting, and reporting fraud: the case of the United Arab Emirates (UAE). Int J Audit 19(2):117–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hu L-T, Bentler PM (1998) Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychol Methods 3:424–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hu L-T, Bentler PM (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Model 6:1–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Institute of Internal Auditors-IIA (2011) Imperatives for change: the IIA global internal audit survey in action. Institute of Internal Auditors Research Foundation, Altamonte SpringsGoogle Scholar
  22. Institute of Internal Auditors-IIA (2014) The IIA’s global internal audit competency framework—career map alignment. The Institute of Internal Auditors Inc.Google Scholar
  23. Institute of Internal Auditors-IIA (2016) Standards for the professional practice of internal auditing (Standards)Google Scholar
  24. Kaptein M (1998) Ethics management: auditing and developing the ethical content of organization. Kluwer AcademicGoogle Scholar
  25. MacCallum RC, Austin JT (2000) Applications of structural equation modeling in psychological research. Ann Rev Psychol 51:201–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. MacCallum RC, Browne MW, Sugawara HM (1996) Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychol Methods 1:130–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mackenzie C (1998) Ethical auditing and ethical knowledge. J Bus Ethics 17(13):1395–1402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Melé D (2012) Management ethics: placing ethics at the core of good management (Iese Business Collection). Palgrave Macmillian, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Michael M, Dalton DR, Hill JW (1993) The organization of ethics and the ethics of organizations: the case for expanded organizational ethics audits. Bus Ethics Q 3(1):27–43Google Scholar
  30. Morland MP (2008) Business ethics as practice: ethics as the everyday business of business. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  31. Nagy AL, Cenker WJ (2002) An assessment of the newly defined internal audit function. Manag Audit J 17(3):130–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sawyer LB (1988) Sawyerˈs internal auditing. Institute of Internal Auditors, Altamonte SpringsGoogle Scholar
  33. Sawyer LB, Dittenhofer MA (1996) Sawyerˈs internal auditing: the practice of modern internal auditing, 4th edn. The Institute of Internal Auditors, Altamonte SpringsGoogle Scholar
  34. Schneider A (1984) Modeling external auditors’ evaluations of internal auditing. J Acc Res 22:657–678CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Selznick P (1984) Leadership in administration—a sociological interpretation. University of California Press. ISBN 9780520049949Google Scholar
  36. Spraakman G (1997) Transaction cost economics: a theory of internal audit. Manag Audit J 17(7):323–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Steiger JH, Lind JC (1980) Statistically based tests for the number of standard factors. Paper presented at the Psychometric Society annual meeting, Iowa City, IAGoogle Scholar
  38. Stern GM (1994) 15 ways internal auditing departments are adding value. Intern Audit 51(2):30–33Google Scholar
  39. Sutton SG (1993) Toward an understanding of the factors affecting the quality of the audit process. Decis Sci 24(1):88–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Thompson AA, Strickland AJ (2001) Strategic management: concepts and cases, International edition. McGraw Hill, BostonGoogle Scholar
  41. Trevino LK, Weaver GR (2003) Managing ethics in organizations: a social-scientific perspective on business ethics. Stanford University Press, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  42. Vallance E (1995) Business ethics at work. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Van Gansberghe CN (2005) Internal auditing in the public sector: a consultative forum in Nairobi, Kenya, shores up best practices for government audit professionals in developing nations. Intern Audit 62(4):69–73Google Scholar
  44. van Montfort P, de Haan I, Hogendoorn R, Vermeeren B (2010) Measuring the effectiveness of integrity management: a study comparing the effectiveness of value-based and compliance based approaches of integrity in Dutch public sector organizations by measuring employee perceptions. https://www.law.kuleuven.be/integriteit/egpa/egpa2010/de-haan-et-al_measuring-effectiveness-integrity.pdf
  45. Victor B, Cullen JB (1987) A theory and measure of ethical climate in organizations. In: Frederick WC (ed) Research in corporate social performance. JAI Press, Greenwich, pp 57–71Google Scholar
  46. Weaver GR, Trevino LK, Cochran PL (1999) Corporate ethics programs as control systems: influences of executive commitment and environmental factors. Acad Manag J 42(1):41–58Google Scholar
  47. White AW (1976) The essentials for the effective internal audit department. Intern Audit, 30–33Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sezer Bozkuş Kahyaoglu
    • 2
  • Bulent Balkan
    • 1
  • Ozlem Balkan
    • 1
  1. 1.SMM BilişimIstanbulTurkey
  2. 2.Izmir Bakircay UniversityIzmirTurkey

Personalised recommendations