Advertisement

Measuring the Quality of Codes of Conduct in Greek Listed Companies

  • Michail NerantzidisEmail author
  • Anastasios Tsamis
Chapter
Part of the Accounting, Finance, Sustainability, Governance & Fraud: Theory and Application book series (AFSGFTA)

Abstract

Even though there has been an increasing interest by scholars regarding the importance of corporate codes of conduct (COC) over the last decades, there has also been a rarity of research examining the quality of these codes. This study develops a framework and evaluates the intrinsic quality of such codes in the Greek context. Using data on 22 Greek companies listed on Athens Stock Exchange and according to the COC collected from their Web sites, we found that the average “conduct” rating is 66.51% under the dichotomous method and 63.93% under the PC unweighted method, with this difference being statistically significant. Moreover, we present evidence that the quality is higher in larger companies regardless of the used method for items weighing. All in all, our findings have exciting implications for academics and practitioners.

Keywords

Index Score Rating Codes of conduct Code of ethics Dichotomous method PC unweighted method 

References

  1. Adams JS, Taschian A, Shore TH (2001) Codes of ethics as signals for ethical behavior. J Bus Ethics 29(3):199–211Google Scholar
  2. Aguilera RV, Desender KA (2012) Challenges in the measuring of comparative corporate governance: a review of the main indices. In: Wang CL, Ketchen DJ, Bergh DD (eds.), West meets East: building theoretical bridges (Research methodology in strategy and management), vol 8. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, UK, pp 289–322Google Scholar
  3. Allen J, Davis D (1993) Assessing some determinant effects of ethical consulting behavior: the case of personal and professional values. J Bus Ethics 12(6):449–458Google Scholar
  4. Association of Business Schools (ABS) (2015) Academic Journal Guide 2015. Available at: http://charteredabs.org/academic-journal-guide-2015/. Accessed 20 Sept 2015
  5. Beneish MD, Chatov R (1993) Corporate codes of conduct: economic determinants and legal implications for independent auditors. J Account Public Policy 12(1):3–35Google Scholar
  6. Black B (2001) The corporate governance behavior and market value of Russian firms. Emerg Markets Rev 2(2):89–108Google Scholar
  7. Bondy K, Matten D, Moon J (2004) The adoption of voluntary codes of conduct in MNCs: a three-country comparative study. Bus Soc Rev 109(4):449–477Google Scholar
  8. Callaghan M, Wood G, Payan JM, Singh J, Svensson G (2012) Code of ethics quality: an international comparison of corporate staff support and regulation in Australia, Canada, and the United States. Bus Ethics Eur Rev 21(1):15–30Google Scholar
  9. Callan VJ (1992) Predicting ethical values and training needs in ethics. J Bus Ethics 11(10):761–769Google Scholar
  10. Carasco EF, Singh JB (2003) The content and focus of the codes of ethics of the world’s largest transnational corporations. Bus Soc Rev 108(1):71–94Google Scholar
  11. Chatterjee C, Lefcovitch A (2009) Corporate social responsibility and banks. Amicus Curiae [online] 78:24–28. Available at: http://sas-space.sas.ac.uk/2304/1/Amicus78_ChatterjeeLefcovitch.pdf. Accessed 27 July 2015
  12. Cleek MA, Leonard SL (1998) Can corporate codes of ethics influence behavior? J Bus Ethics 17(6):619–630Google Scholar
  13. Costello KW (2000) Do codes of conduct achieve their objective? Electr J 13(2):55–66Google Scholar
  14. de Waegeneer ED, van de Sompele J, Willem A (2015) Ethical codes in sports organizations: classification framework, content analysis, and the influence of content on code effectiveness. J Bus Ethics (forthcoming)Google Scholar
  15. Donker H, Poff D, Zahir S (2008) Corporate values, codes of ethics, and firm performance: a look at the Canadian context. J Bus Ethics 82(3):527–537Google Scholar
  16. Erwin PM (2011) Corporate codes of conduct: the effects of code content and quality on a decent performance. J Bus Ethics 99(4):535–548Google Scholar
  17. Farrell BJ, Cobbin DM (1996) A content analysis of codes of ethics in Australian enterprises. J Manag Psychol 11(1):37–55Google Scholar
  18. Farrell BJ, Cobbin DM, Farrell HM (2002) Codes of ethics: their evolution, development and other controversies. J Manage Dev 21(2):152–163Google Scholar
  19. Florou A, Galarniotis A (2007) Benchmarking Greek corporate governance against different standards. Corp Governance Int Rev 15(5):979–998Google Scholar
  20. Frankel MS (1989) Professional codes: why, how, and with what impact? J Bus Ethics 8(2–3):109–115Google Scholar
  21. Garay U, González M (2008) Corporate governance and firm value: the case of Venezuela. Corp Governance Int Rev 16(3):194–209Google Scholar
  22. Garegnani GM, Merlotti EP, Russo A (2015a) Scoring firms’ codes of ethics: an explorative study of quality drivers. J Bus Ethics 126(4):541–557Google Scholar
  23. Garegnani GM, Merlotti EP, Russo A (2015b) Untangling the antecedents of codes of ethics quality: does corporate governance matter? Corp Governance Int J Bus Soc 15(5):607–622Google Scholar
  24. Gaumnitz BR, Lere JC (2002) Contents of codes of ethics of professional business organizations in the United States. J Bus Ethics 35(1):35–49Google Scholar
  25. Gavin TA, Roy RA, Sumners GE (1990) A corporate code of conduct: the internal auditor’s role. Manag Auditing J 5(2):32–41Google Scholar
  26. Graafland J, van den Ven B, Stoffele N (2003) Strategies and instruments for organizing CSR by small and large businesses in the Netherlands. J Bus Ethics 47(1):45–60Google Scholar
  27. Halff G (2010) Codes of conduct: managing the contradictions between local and corporate norms. J Commun Manag 14(4):356–367Google Scholar
  28. Harker D, Harker M (2000) The role of codes of conduct in the advertising self-regulatory framework. J Macro 20(2):155–166Google Scholar
  29. Healy M, Iles J (2002) The establishment and enforcement of codes. J Bus Ethics 39(1):117–124Google Scholar
  30. Hite RE, Bellizzi JA, Fraser C (1988) A content analysis of ethical policy statements regarding marketing activities. J Bus Ethics 7(10):771–776Google Scholar
  31. Kaptein M (2004) Business codes of multinational firms: what do they say? J Bus Ethics 50(1):13–31Google Scholar
  32. Kaptein M, Schwartz MS (2008) The effectiveness of business codes: a critical examination of existing studies and the development of an integrated research model. J Bus Ethics 77(2):111–127Google Scholar
  33. Ki EJ, Kim SY (2010) Ethics statements of public relations firms: what do they say? J Bus Ethics 91(2):223–236Google Scholar
  34. Klein P, Shapiro D, Young J (2005) Corporate governance, family ownership, and firm value: the Canadian evidence. Corp Governance Int Rev 13(6):769–784Google Scholar
  35. Kolk A, van Tulder R (2002) The effectiveness of self-regulation: corporate codes of conduct and child labor. Eur Manag J 20(3):260–271Google Scholar
  36. Langlois CC, Schlegelmilch BB (1990) Do corporate codes of ethics reflect national character? Evidence from Europe and the United States. J Int Bus Stud 21(4):519–539Google Scholar
  37. Leeper RV (1996) Moral objectivity, Jurgen Habermas’s discourse ethics, and public relations. Public Relat Rev 22(2):133–150Google Scholar
  38. Lefebvre M, Singh JB (1992) The content and focus of Canadian corporate codes of ethics. J Bus Ethics 11(10):799–808Google Scholar
  39. Lindsay RM, Lindsay LM, Irvine VB (1996) Instilling ethical behavior in organizations: a survey of Canadian companies. J Bus Ethics 15(4):393–407Google Scholar
  40. Long BS, Driscoll C (2008) Codes of ethics and the pursuit of organisational legitimacy: theoretical and empirical contributions. J Bus Ethics 77(2):173–189Google Scholar
  41. Maitland I (1985) The limits of business self-regulation. Calif Manag Rev 27(3):132–147Google Scholar
  42. Malloy DC, Fennell DA (1998) Codes of ethics and tourism: an exploratory content analysis. Tour Manag 19(5):453–461Google Scholar
  43. Marnburg E (2000) The behavioural effects of corporate ethical codes: empirical findings and discussion. Bus Ethics Europ Rev 9(3):200–210Google Scholar
  44. McKendall M, DeMarr B, Jones-Rikkers C (2002) Ethical compliance programs and corporate illegality: testing the assumptions of the corporate sentencing guidelines. J Bus Ethics 37(4):367–383Google Scholar
  45. McKinney JA, Emerson TL, Neubert MJ (2010) The effects of ethical codes on ethical perceptions of actions toward stakeholders. J Bus Ethics 97(4):505–516Google Scholar
  46. Melrose-Woodman J, Kverndal I (1976) Towards social responsibility: company codes of ethics and practice. British Institute of Management Survey Reports, No. 28Google Scholar
  47. Messikomer C, Cirka C (2010) Constructing a code of ethics: an experimental case of a national professional organisation. J Bus Ethics 95(1):55–71Google Scholar
  48. Murphy PE (2005) Developing, communicating and promoting corporate ethics statements: a longitudinal analysis. J Bus Ethics 62(2):183–189Google Scholar
  49. Nerantzidis M (2012) Delphic Hierarchy Process (DHP): a methodology for the resolution of the problems of the evaluation of Corporate Governance Quality. In: 10th European academic conference on “internal audit and corporate governance (Ph.D. Workshop): proceedings of a conference, Verona, Italy 2012Google Scholar
  50. Nerantzidis M (2015a) Measuring the quality of the “comply or explain” approach: evidence from the implementation of the Greek corporate governance code. Manag Auditing J 30(4/5):373–412Google Scholar
  51. Nerantzidis M (2015b) Comparing intellectual capital disclosure among the Greek listed companies: does sector and capitalisation matter? Int J Learn Intellect Capital 12(2):146–169Google Scholar
  52. Nerantzidis M, Filos J (2014) Recent corporate governance developments in Greece. Corp Gover 14(3):281–299Google Scholar
  53. O’Dwyer B, Madden G (2006) Ethical codes of conduct in Irish companies: a survey of code content and enforcement procedures. J Bus Ethics 63(3):217–236Google Scholar
  54. Pitt HL, Groskaufmanis KA (1990) Minimizing corporate civil and criminal liability: a second look at corporate codes of conduct. Georgetown Law J 78:1559–1654Google Scholar
  55. Raiborn CA, Payne D (1990) Corporate codes of conduct: a collective conscience and continuum. J Bus Ethics 9(11):879–889Google Scholar
  56. Schlegelmilch BB, Houston JE (1989) Corporate codes of ethics in large UK companies: an empirical investigation of use, content, and attitudes. Eur J Mark 23(6):7–24Google Scholar
  57. Schwartz M (2000) Why ethical codes constitute an unconscionable regression. J Bus Ethics 23(2):173–184Google Scholar
  58. Schwartz MS (2001) The nature of the relationship between codes of ethics and behaviour. J Bus Ethics 32(3):247–262Google Scholar
  59. Singh JB (2006) A comparison of the contents of the codes of ethics of Canada’s largest corporations in 1992 and 2003. J Bus Ethics 64(1):17–29Google Scholar
  60. Singh J, Carasco E, Svensson G, Wood G, Callaghan M (2005) A comparative study of corporate codes of ethics in Australia, Canada, and Sweden. J World Bus 40(1):91–109Google Scholar
  61. Snell RS, Herndon NC Jr (2004) Hong Kong’s code of ethics initiative: some differences between theory and practice. J Bus Ethics 51(1):75–89Google Scholar
  62. Somers MJ (2001) Ethical codes of conduct and organizational context: a study of the relationship between codes of conduct an employee behavior and organizational values. J Bus Ethics 30(2):185–195Google Scholar
  63. Spence LJ, Lozano JF (2000) Communicating about ethics with small firms: experiences from the U.K. and Spain. J Bus Ethics 27(1):43–53Google Scholar
  64. Spence LJ, Jeurissen R, Rutherfoord R (2000) Small business and the environment in the UK and the Netherlands: toward stakeholder cooperation. Bus Ethics Q 10(4):945–965Google Scholar
  65. Stevens B (1994) An analysis of corporate ethical code studies: “where do we go from here?”. J Bus Ethics 13(1):63–69Google Scholar
  66. Stevens B (1997) Hotel ethical codes: a content analysis. Int J Hospitality Manage 16(3):261–271Google Scholar
  67. Stevens B (1999) Communicating ethical values: a study of employee perceptions. J Bus Ethics 20(2):113–120Google Scholar
  68. Stevens B (2008) Corporate ethical codes: useful instruments for influencing behavior. J Bus Ethics 78(4):601–609Google Scholar
  69. Street D, Gray S (2001) Observance of international accounting standards: Factors explaining non-compliance. Research report 74. Association of Chartered Certified Accountants, LondonGoogle Scholar
  70. Striukova L, Unerman J, Guthrie J (2008) Corporate reporting of intellectual capital: evidence from UK companies. Br Account Rev 40(4):297–313Google Scholar
  71. Tilley F (2000) Small firm environmental ethics: how deep do they go? Bus Ethics Europ Rev 9(1):31–41Google Scholar
  72. Tsalavoutas I (2011) Transition to IFRS and compliance with mandatory disclosure requirements: what is the signal? Adv Account, incorporating Adv Int Account 27(2):390–405Google Scholar
  73. Tsalavoutas I, Evans L, Smith M (2010) Comparison of two methods for measuring compliance with IFRS mandatory disclosure requirements. J Appl Account Res 11(3):213–228Google Scholar
  74. Wallace RSO, Naser K (1995) Firm-specific determinants of comprehensiveness of mandatory disclosure in the corporate annual reports of firms listed on the stock exchange of Hong Kong. J Account Public Policy 14(4):311–368Google Scholar
  75. Weaver GR, Treviño LK, Cochran PL (1999) Corporate ethics practices in the Mid-1990’s: an empirical study of the Fortune 1000. J Bus Ethics 18(3):283–294Google Scholar
  76. Werner SB (1992) The movement for reforming American business ethics: a twenty-year perspective. J Bus Ethics 11(1):61–70Google Scholar
  77. White BJ, Montgomery BR (1980) Corporate codes of conduct. Calif Manag Rev 23(2):80–87Google Scholar
  78. Wood G (2000) A cross-cultural comparison of the contents of codes of ethics: USA, Canada, and Australia. J Bus Ethics 25(4):287–298Google Scholar
  79. Wright DK (1993) Enforcement dilemma: voluntary nature of public relations codes. Public Relat Rev 19(1):13–20Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Hellenic Open UniversityPatraGreece
  2. 2.Department of Public AdministrationPanteion University of Social and Political SciencesAthensGreece

Personalised recommendations