Advertisement

Biological Wastewater Treatment for Prevention of River Water Pollution and Reuse: Perspectives and Challenges

  • N. K. Singh
  • G. Gupta
  • A. K. Upadhyay
  • U. N. Rai
Chapter

Abstract

Wastewater discharge with high biological oxygen demand (BOD) and high nutrient levels (e.g., nitrate, phosphate) affects water quality and is a major reason for degradation of water bodies, including rivers. In addition, metals and other toxic elements are also concentrated in aquatic bodies due to the continuous disposal of wastewater that is treated or partially treated. In many developing countries, wastewater treatment facilities are not fully operational due to energy crises and improper maintenance. However, under the provisions of the Environmental Protection Act, maximum permissible limits have been established for the disposal of different pollutants into surface water bodies. Therefore, the appropriate treatment of wastewater containing various pollutants is mandatory before its disposal into a body of water. Conventional methods of wastewater treatment use sewage treatment plants; however, they may be unable to treat wastewater properly and completely due to their higher cost and maintenance requirements. In this case, green plant-based technologies such as phytoremediation, the development of constructed wetlands, and algal pond systems may perform key roles in treating wastewater by removing nutrients and toxic metals before their discharge into rivers. By implementing plant-based, low-cost, and eco-friendly technologies for the treatment of wastewater at the source of origin up to a permissible level of discharge, we can prevent the pollution of surface water bodies and recycle the treated water in agriculture for irrigation, gardening, and other purposes.

Keywords

Wastewater treatment Water pollution Reuse Plant Phytoremediation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The author is thankful to the Dean and Director of the School of Basic Sciences at Manipal University, Jaipur, India, for providing facilities.

References

  1. Abbasi SA, Ramasami EV (1999) Biotechnological methods of pollution control. University Press, HyderabadGoogle Scholar
  2. Al-Homaidan AA, Al-Ghanayem AA, Areej AH (2011) Int J Water Resour Arid Environ:1–10Google Scholar
  3. Arias CA, Bubba MD, Brix H (2001) Phosphorus removal by sands for use as media in sub-surface flow constructed reed beds. Water Res 35:1159–1168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Assunção AG, Schat H, Aarts MG (2003) Thlaspi caerulescens, an attractive model species to study heavy metal hyper accumulation in plants. New Phytol 159(2):351–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bahar MM, Megharaj M, Naidu R (2013) Toxicity transformation and accumulation of inorganic arsenic species in microalga Scendesmus sp. isolated from soil. J Appl Phycol 25:913–917CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Birol E, Das S (2010) Estimating the value of improved wastewater treatment: the case of River Ganga, India. J Environ Manag 91:2163–2171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Breen PF (1990) A mass balance method for assessing the potential of artificial wetlands for wastewater treatment. Wat Res 24:689–697CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Breitholtz M, Naslund M, Strae D, Borg H (2012) An evaluation of free water surface wetlands as tertiary sewage water treatment of micro-pollutants. Ecotoxi Environ Saf 78:63–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bursali EA, Cavas L, Seki Y, Bozkurt SS, Yurdakoc M (2009) Chem Eng J 150:385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carty A, Scholz M, Heal K, Gouriveau F, Mustafa A (2008) The universal design, operation and maintenance guidelines for farm constructed wetlands (FCW) in temperate climates. Bioresour Technol 99:6780–6792CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cherian S, Oliveira MM (2005) Transgenic plants in phytoremediation: recent advances and new possibilities. Environ Sci Technol 39(24):9377–9390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. CPCB (2005) Performance status of common effluent treatment plants in India. Central Pollution Control Board, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  13. CPCB (2007) Advance methods for treatment of textile industry effluents, Resource Recycling Series: RERES/&/2007. Central Pollution Control Board, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  14. CPCB (2009) Forth report on status of water supply, sewage generation and treatment series in India. Central Pollution Control Board, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  15. Craggs RJ, Adey WH, Jenson KR, St. John MS, Green GF, Oswald WJ (1996) Phosphorous removal from wastewater using and algal turf scrubber. Water Sci Technol 33:191–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ellis JB, Shutes RB, Revitt DM, Zhang TT (1994) Use of macrophytes for pollution treatment in urban wetlands. Resour Conserv Recycl 11:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. EPA, Environmental (Protection) Act, India (1986)Google Scholar
  18. Finlayson MC, Chick AJ (1983) Testing the significance of aquatic plants to treat abattoir effluent. Wat Res 17:15–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fritioff A, Greger M (2003) Aquatic and terrestrial plant species with potential to remove heavy metals from storm water. Int J Phytoremediation 5:211–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fulekar MH, Singh A, Bhaduri AM (2009) Genetic engineering strategies for enhancing phytoremediation of heavy metals. Afr J Biotechnol 8:1–4Google Scholar
  21. Gill LW, Ring P, Higgins NM, Johnston PM (2014) Accumulation of heavy metals in a constructed wetland treating road runoff. Ecol Eng 70:133–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Giorgetti L, Talouizte H, Merzouki M, Caltavuturo L, Geri C, Frassinetti S (2011) Genotoxicity evaluation of effluents from textile industries of the region Boulmane, Morocco: acase study. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 74:2275–2283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gochfeld M (2003) Cases of mercury exposure, bioavailability, and adsorption. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 56:174–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gray NF (2008) Drinking water quality: problems and solutions. Cambridge University Press. EPA, Environmental (Protection) Act, India, 1986Google Scholar
  25. Guittonny-Philippe A, Masotti V, Höhener P, Boudenne JL, Viglione J, Laffont-Schwob I (2014) Constructed wetlands to reduce metal pollution from industrial catchments in aquatic Mediterranean ecosystems: a review to overcome obstacles and suggest potential solutions. Environ Int 64:1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Guntensbergen GR, Stearns F, Kadlec JA (1989) Wetland vegetation. In: Hammer DA (ed) Constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment. Lewis publishers, Chelsea, pp 73–88Google Scholar
  27. Hadad HR, Maine MA, Bonetto CA (2006) Macrophytes growth in a pilot-scale constructed wetland for industrial wastewater treatment. Chemosphere 63:1744–1753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Howes BL, Teal JM (1994) Oxygen loss from Spartina alterniflora and its relation to salt marsh oxygen balance. Oecologia 97:431–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ibraheem IBM (1998) Utilization of certain algae in the treatment of wastewater. Ph.D. Thesis, Faculty of Science Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt, pp 197Google Scholar
  30. Jenssen PD, Maehlum T, Krogstad T (1993) Potential use of constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment in northern environments. Water Sci Technol 28:149–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kaplan D, Christiaen D, Arad S (1988) Binding of heavy metals by algal polysaccharides. In: Stadler T, Mollion J, Verdus MC, Karamanos Y, Morvan H, Christiaen D (eds) Algal biotechnology. Elsevier Applied Science, London, pp 179–187Google Scholar
  32. Kartal B, Kuenen JV, Van Loosdrecht MCM (2010) Sewage treatment with anammox. Science 328:702–703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lesage E, Mundia C, Rosseau DPL, Van de Moortel AMK, Du Laing G, Meers E, Tack FMG, De Pauw N, Verloo MG (2007) Sorption of Co, Cu, Ni, and Zn from industrial effluents by the submerged aquatic macrophyte Myriophyllum spicatum L. Ecol Eng 30:320–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lomax C, Liu WJ, Wu L, Xue K, Xiong J, Zhou J, McGrath SP, Meharg AA, Miller AJ, Zhao FJ (2011) Methylated arsenic species in plants originate from soil microorganisms. New Phytol 193:665–672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ma AN, Cheah SC, Chow MC (1990) Current status on treatment and utilization of palm oil industrial wasters in Malaysia. Special coordination meeting of the working group on environmental biotechnology, Kuala LumpurGoogle Scholar
  36. Markandya A, Murty MN (2004) Cost benefit analysis of cleaning the Ganges: some emerging environment and development issues. Environ Dev Econ, Cambridge University Press 9(01):61–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Masi F, Caffaz S, Ghrabi A (2013) Multi-stage constructed wetland systems for municipal wastewater treatment. Water Sci Technol 67:1590–1598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mehta SK, Gaur JP (2005) Use of algae for removing heavy metals ions from wasterwater, progress and prospects. Crit Rev Biotechnol 25:113–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mishra VK, Tripathi BD (2009) Accumulation of chromium and zinc from aqueous solutions using water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes). J Hazard Mater 164:1059–1063CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Oswald WJ (1988) Micro-algae and wastewater treatment. In: Borowitzka MA, Borowitzka LJ (eds) Micro-algal biotechnology. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 305–328Google Scholar
  41. Ovecka M, Takac T (2014) Managing heavy metal toxicity stress in plants: biological and biotechnological tools. Biotechnol Adv 32:73–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Peng KJ, Luo CL, Lou LQ, Li XD, Shen ZG (2008) Bioaccumulation of heavy metals by the aquatic plants Potamogeton pectinatus L. and Potamogeton malaianus Miq. and their potential use for contamination indicators and in wastewater treatment. Sci Total Environ 392:22–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Peterson SB, Teal JM (1996) The role of plants in ecologically engineered wastewater treatment systems. Ecol Eng 6:137–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Pilon M, Cohu CM, Ravet K, Abdel-Ghany SE, Gaymard F (2009) Essential transition metal homeostasis in plants. Curr Opin Plant Biol 12:347–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Purushothaman P, Chakrapani GJ (2007) Heavy metals fractionation in Ganga River sediments. India Environ Monit Assess Sep 132:475–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rai UN (2004) Plantation on the banks of river ganga. Gandhi, Ganga, Giriraj. Navjivan Publishing House, Ahmedabad, pp 1–20Google Scholar
  47. Rai UN, Singh NK, Shukla MK, Verma S, Prasad D, Khan SR (2010) Plant based Management of Ganga Water Pollution: constructed wetland for waste treatment and river front plantation. In: Pandey DD (ed) Environmental pollution: a threat to living world. Jaspal Prakashan, Patna, pp 1–9Google Scholar
  48. Rai UN, Singh NK, Verma S, Prasad D, Upadhyay AK (2011) Perspectives in plant based management of ganga water pollution: a negative carbon technique to rehabilitate river ecosystem. Appl Bot Abs 31:64–81Google Scholar
  49. Rai UN, Prasad D, Verma S, Upadhyay AK, Singh NK (2012) Bio monitoring of metals in ganga water at different Ghats of Haridwar: implications of constructed wetland for sewage detoxification. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 89:805–810CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rai UN, Tripathi RD, Singh NK, Upadhyay AK, Dwivedi S, Shukla MK, Mallick S, Singh SN, Nautiyal CS (2013) Constructed wetland as an Ecotechnological tool for pollution treatment for conservation of Ganga River. Bioresour Technol 148:535–541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Rai UN, Upadhyay AK, Singh NK, Dwivedi S, Tripathi RD (2015) Seasonal applicability of horizontal sub-surface flow constructed wetland for trace elements and nutrient removal from urban wastes to conserve Ganga River water quality at Haridwar, India. Ecol Eng 81:115–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Rascioa N, Navari-Izzo F (2011) Heavy metal hyperaccumulating plants: how and why do they do it? And what makes them so interesting? Plant Sci 180:169–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Raskin I (1996) Plant genetic engineering may help with environmental cleanup. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 93:3164–3166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Reed SC, Crites RW, Middlebrooks EJ (1995) Natural Systems for Waste Management and Treatment 2nded. McGraw Hill, New York, pp 173–284Google Scholar
  55. Rogers KH, Breen PF, Chick AJ (1991) Nitrogen removal in experimental wetland treatment systems: evidence for the role of aquatic plants. Res J Water Polit Control Fed 63:934–941Google Scholar
  56. Salt DE, Blaylock M, Kumar PBAN, Dushenkov V, Ensley BD, Chet I (1995) Phytoremediation: a novel strategy for removal of toxic metals from the environment using plant. Nat Biotechnol 13:468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Scholz M, Lee BH (2005) Constructed wetlands: a review. Int J Environ Stud 62(4):421–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Shelef G, Azov Y, Moraine R, Oron G (1980) In: Shelef G, Soeder CJ (eds) Algal mass production as an integral part of wastewater treatment and reclamation system in algal biomass. Elsevier, pp 163–190Google Scholar
  59. Sheoran AS, Sheoran V (2006) Heavy metal removal mechanism of acid mine drainage in wetlands: a critical review. Miner Eng 19(2):105–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Singh KP, Mohan D, Sinha S, Dalwani R (2004) Impact assessment of treated/untreated wastewater toxicants discharged by sewage treatment plants on health, agricultural, and environmental quality in the wastewater disposal area. Chemosphere 55:227–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Singh NK, Raghubanshi AS, Upadhyay AK, Rai UN (2016) Arsenic and other heavy metal accumulation in plants and algae growing naturally in contaminated area of West Bengal, India. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 130:224–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Stewart WDP (1966) Nitrogen fixation in plants. Athlene Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  63. Sune N, Sanchez G, Caffarattia S, Maine MA (2007) Cadmium and chromium removal kinetics from solution by two aquatic macrophytes. Environ Pollut 145:467–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Suresh B, Ravishankar GA (2004) Phytoremediation: a novel and promising approach for environmental cleanup. Crit Rev Biotechnol 24:97–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Talke IN, Hanikenne M, Krämer U (2006) Zinc-dependent global transcriptional control, transcriptional deregulation, and higher gene copy number for genes in metal homeostasis of the hyperaccumulator Arabidopsis halleri. Plant Physiol 142:148–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Tangahu BV, Abdullah SRS, Basri H, Idris M, Anuar N, Mukhlisin M (2011) A review on heavy metals (As, Pb, and Hg) uptake by plants through phytoremediation. Int J Chem Eng 2011:31.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/939161 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1993) Subsurface flow constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment. A Technology Assessment. Office of Water, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  68. Upadhyay AK, Singh NK, Rai UN (2014) Comparative metal accumulation potential of Potamogeton pectinatus and Potamogeton crispus: role of enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidants in tolerance and detoxification of metals. Aquat Bot 117:27–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Upadhyay AK, Singh NK, Singh R, Rai UN (2016) Amelioration of arsenic toxicity in rice: comparative effect of inoculation of Chlorella vulgaris and Nannochloropsis sp. on growth, biochemical changes and arsenic uptake. Ecoto Environ Saf 124:68–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Upadhyay AK, Singh NK, Bankoti NS, Rai UN (2017) Designing and construction of simulated constructed wetland for treatment of sewage containing metals. Environ Technol 38:2691–2699CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Wang NX, Li Y, Deng XH, Miao AJ, Ji R, Yang LY (2013) Toxicity and bioaccumulation kinetics of arsenate in two freshwater green algae under different phosphate regimes. Water Res 47:2497–2506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Wong CM, Williams CE, Pittock J, Collier U, Schelle P (2007) World’s top 10 rivers at risk. WWF International, GlandGoogle Scholar
  73. Wu H, Zhang J, Li P, Zhang J, Xie H, Zhang B (2011) Nutrient removal in constructed microcosm wetlands for treating polluted river water in northern China. Ecol Eng 37:560–568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Zhang DQ, Gersberg RM, Hua T, Zhu J, Tuan NA, Tan SK (2012) Pharmaceutical removal in tropical sub-surface flow constructed wetlands at varying hydraulic rates. Chemosphere 87:273–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • N. K. Singh
    • 1
  • G. Gupta
    • 1
  • A. K. Upadhyay
    • 2
  • U. N. Rai
    • 2
  1. 1.Environmental Science discipline, Department of ChemistryManipal University JaipurJaipurIndia
  2. 2.Plant Ecology and Environmental Science DivisionCSIR-National Botanical Research InstituteLucknowIndia

Personalised recommendations