Advertisement

Treatment of Wastewater Using Vermifiltration Technology

  • M. M. Manyuchi
  • N. Mupoperi
  • C. Mbohwa
  • E. Muzenda
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter focuses on an alternative biological method for wastewater treatment using the vermifiltration system. The vermifiltration system must meet the desired process and design parameters for optimum wastewater treatment. A case study for swine wastewater treatment using a 3-stage vermifiltration process was used. Three vermifilters with media which is comprised of Eisenia fetida earthworms, garden soil, sand and quartz stones were used as the filtration media. The swine wastewater chemical oxygen demand (COD), biological oxygen demand (BOD5), total suspended solids (TSS), total dissolved solids (TDS), electrical conductivity (EC) and dissolved oxygen (DO) values were measured before and after treatment with the vermifiltration at each stage. The parameters were measured using standard methods. Treatment using a 3-stage vermifilter connected in series resulted in 99.2% reduction in COD, 99.4% in BOD5, 99.2% in TSS, 80.2% in TDS and 86.9% in EC. The DO concentration increased by >345.5%. Application of the vermifiltration technology in swine wastewater treatment allows for effective biological contaminants, and the technology is easily adoptable in developing countries due to its simplicity and treats water to acceptable standards.

Keywords

Earthworms Vermifiltration Vermicompost Wastewater treatment 

References

  1. Adugna AT (2016) Concentrated greywater treatment by vermifiltration for Sub-Saharan urban poor. International Institute for Water and Environmental Engineering Thesis for the grade of: doctor in sciences and Technologies of Water, Energy and Environment Specialty: WaterGoogle Scholar
  2. APHA (2005) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 21st edn. America Public Health Association, American Water Works, Association, Water Environment Federation, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  3. Bartlett MD, Briones MJI, Neilson R, Schmidt O, Spurgeon D, Creamer RE (2010) A critical review of current methods in earthworm ecology: from individuals to populations. Eur J Soil Biol 46(2):67–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baumgartner R (2013) Developing a testing protocol for Vermifiltration-based Onsite Wastewater Treatment Systems (VOWTS), pp 1–60Google Scholar
  5. Chan K-Y, Munro K (2001) Evaluating mustard extracts for earthworm sampling. Pedobiologia 45(3):272–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Čoja T, Zehetner K, Bruckner A, Watzinger A, Meyer E (2008) Efficacy and side effects of five sampling methods for soil earthworms (Annelida, Lumbricidae). Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 71(2):552–565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Deng L, Zheng P, Chen Z, Mamood Q (2008) Improvement in post-treatment of digested piggery wastewater. Bioresour Technol 99(8):3136–3145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Edwards CA, Fletcher KE (1988) Interactions between earthworms and micro-organisms in organic-matter breakdown. Agric Ecosyst Environ 24:235–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ghatnekar SD, Kavian MF, Sharma SM, Ghatnekar GS, Ghatnekar AV (2010) Application of vermifilter based effluent treatment plant (pilot scale) for bio-management of liquid effluents for the gelatin industry. Dyn Soil Dyn Plant 4(1):83–88Google Scholar
  10. Jiménez JJ, Lavelle P, Decaens T (2006) The efficiency of soil hand-sorting in assessing the abundance and biomass of earthworm communities. Its usefulness in population dynamics and cohort analysis studies. Eur J Soil Biol 42(1):S225–S230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kharwade AM, Khedikar IP (2011) Laboratory scale studies on domestic grey water through vermifilter and non-vermifilter. J Eng Res Stud 2(4):35–39Google Scholar
  12. Malek TEBUA, Ismali SA, Ibrahim MH (2013) A study on hydraulic loading rate and worm density in vermifiltration of palm oil mill effluent. J Ind Res Technol 3(1):1–5Google Scholar
  13. Meiyan X, Xiaowei L, Yang L (2010) Treatment performance of small-scales vermifilter for domestic wastewater and its relationship to earthworm growth, reproduction and enzymatic activity. Afr J Biotechnol 9(44):7513–7520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Neuhauser EF, Loehr RC, Malecki MR (1988) The potential of earthworms for managing sewage sludge. In: Edward CA, Neuhauser EF (eds) Earthworms in waste and environmental management. SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague ISBN:90-5103-017-7Google Scholar
  15. Sinha RK, Bharambe G, Chaudhari U (2008) Sewage treatment by vermifiltration with synchronous treatment of sludge by earthworms: a low-cost sustainable technology over conventional systems with potential for decentralization, vol 28. Springer Science, pp 409–420Google Scholar
  16. Sinha RK, Herat S, Bharambe G, Patil S, Bapat PS, Chauhan K, Valani D (2009) Vermiculture biotechnology: the emerging cost-effective and sustainable technology of the 21st century for multiple uses from waste and land management to safe and sustained food production. Environ Res J. NOVA Science Publishers, Hauppauge 3(1):41–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Suthar S (2012) Vermistabilization of wastewater sludge from milk processing industry. Ecol Eng 47:115–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Tchobanoglous G, Burton FL, Stensel HD (1981) Wastewater engineering: treatment and reuse. Metcalf and Eddy, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Xing M, Xiaowei L, Jian Y (2010) Treatment performance of small scale vermifilter for domestic wastewater and its relationship to earthworms’ growth, reproduction and enzymatic activity. Afr J Biotechnol 9(44):7513–7520CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. M. Manyuchi
    • 1
    • 2
  • N. Mupoperi
    • 3
  • C. Mbohwa
    • 1
  • E. Muzenda
    • 1
    • 4
  1. 1.BioEnergy and Environmental Technology Centre, Department of Quality and Operations Management, Faculty of EngineeringUniversity of JohannesburgJohannesburgSouth Africa
  2. 2.Department of Chemical and Processing Engineering, Faculty of EngineeringManicaland State University of Applied SciencesMutareZimbabwe
  3. 3.Department of Chemical and Process Systems EngineeringHarare Institute of TechnologyHarareZimbabwe
  4. 4.Department of Chemical, Materials and Metallurgical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and TechnologyBotswana International University of Science and TechnologyPalapyeBotswana

Personalised recommendations