A Brief Review of Image Quality Enhancement Techniques Based Multi-modal Biometric Fusion Systems

  • Tajinder KumarEmail author
  • Shashi Bhushan
  • Surender Jangra
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 955)


An extensive amount of system needs reliable schemes for personal recognition to confirm the individual identity demanding the services. The aim of these schemes is the authentication of services that can be executed from the genuine user only. Tremendous growth has been seen from last few years in biometric recognition because of the increased requirement of consistent personal identification with the varied government and commercial applications. The biometric recognition is termed as automatic individual recognition on the basis of physiological or behavioural characteristics. This paper provides a brief outline of biometric field and sums up the biometric modalities, biometric framework, and biometric system classification with Image Quality Improvement Techniques. Work done by number of authors in the similar field has been analyzed and defined. The review has also shown the observation of different modalities for recognition accuracy with FAR and FRR.


Biometric recognition Biometric modalities Unimodal and multimodal biometric system Image Quality Improvement Techniques 


  1. 1.
    Leyvand, T., et al.: Biometric recognition. US Patent No. 9,539,500. US Patent and Trademark Office, Washington (2017)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Prabhakar, S., Ivanisov, A., Jain, A.: Biometric recognition: sensor characteristics and image quality. IEEE Instrum. Meas. Mag. 14(3), 10–16 (2011). Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jain, A.K., Ross, A., Prabhakar, S.: An introduction to biometric recognition. IEEE Trans. Circ. Syst. Video Technol. 14, 4–20 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Delac, K., Grgic, M.: A survey of biometric recognition methods. In: 46th International Symposium on Electronics in Marine, 2004 Proceedings Elmar, pp. 184–193 (2004)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Prabhakar, S., Pankanti, S., Jain, A.K.: Biometric recognition: security and privacy concerns. IEEE Secur. Priv. 2, 33–42 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ratha, N.K., Govindaraju, V. (eds.): Advances in Biometrics: Sensors Algorithms and Systems. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chauhan, S., Arora, A.S., Kaul, A.: A survey of emerging biometric modalities. Procedia Comput. Sci 2, 213–218 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Goudelis, G., Tefas, A., Pitas, I.: Emerging biometric modalities: a survey. J. Multimod. User Interfaces 2, 217 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kisku, D.R., Gupta, P., Sing, J.K.: Feature level fusion of biometrics cues: human identification with Doddington’s caricature. In: Ślęzak, D., Kim, T., Fang, W.C., Arnett, K.P. (eds.) SecTech 2009. CCIS, vol. 58, pp. 157–164. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zhang, D., Song, F., Xu, Y., Liang, Z.: Matching score level fusion. In: Advanced Pattern Recognition Technologies with Applications to Biometrics, pp. 305–327. IGI Global (2009)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zhang, D., Song, F., Xu, Y., Liang, Z.: Decision level fusion. In: Advanced Pattern Recognition Technologies with Applications to Biometrics, pp. 328–348. IGI Global (2009)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jain, A.K., Dass, S.C., Nandakumar, K.: Soft biometric traits for personal recognition systems. In: Zhang, D., Jain, A.K. (eds.) ICBA 2004. LNCS, vol. 3072, pp. 731–738. Springer, Heidelberg (2004). Scholar
  13. 13.
    Solayappan, N., Latifi, S.: A survey of unimodal biometric methods. In: Proceedings of the 2006 International Conference on Security and Management, pp. 1609–1618 (2006)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rodrigues, R.N., Ling, L.L., Govindaraju, V.: Robustness of multimodal biometric fusion methods against spoof attacks. J. Vis. Lang. Comput. 20, 169–179 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Conti, V., Militello, C., Sorbello, F., Vitabile, S.: A frequency-based approach for features fusion in fingerprint and iris multimodal biometric identification systems. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part C (Appl. Rev.) 40, 384–395 (2010)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kihal, N., Chitroub, S., Polette, A., Brunette, I., Meunier, J.: Efficient multimodal ocular biometric system for person authentication based on iris texture and corneal shape. IET Biomet. 6, 379–386 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zareen, F.J., Jabin, S.: Authentic mobile-biometric signature verification system. IET Biomet. 5, 13–19 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Yan, Z., Zhao, S.: A usable authentication system based on personal voice challenge. In: Advanced Cloud and Big Data (CBD), pp. 194–199 (2016)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Abdullah-Al-Wadud, M., Kabir, M., Akber Dewan, M., Chae, O.: A dynamic histogram equalization for image contrast enhancement. IEEE Trans. Consum. Electron. 53(2), 593–600 (2007).
  20. 20.
    Yadav, G., Maheshwari, S., Agarwal, A.: Contrast limited adaptive histogram equalization based enhancement for real time video system. In: 2014 International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communications and Informatics ICACCI, pp. 2392–2397 (2014)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gillespie, A.R.: Enhancement of multispectral thermal infrared images: decorrelation contrast stretching. Rem. Sens. Environ. 42, 147–155 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mustapha, A., Hussain, A., Samad, S.A.: A new approach for noise reduction in spine radiograph images using a non-linear contrast adjustment scheme based adaptive factor. Sci. Res. Essays 6, 4246–4258 (2011)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sarhan, S., Alhassan, S., Elmougy, S.: Multimodal biometric systems: a comparative study. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 42, 443–457 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tajinder Kumar
    • 1
    Email author
  • Shashi Bhushan
    • 2
  • Surender Jangra
    • 3
  1. 1.IKGPTUJalandharIndia
  2. 2.CGC, LandranMohaliIndia
  3. 3.GTBCBhawanigarhIndia

Personalised recommendations