Advertisement

Pitch Motion Studies of Barge Supporting 5-MW-NREL Offshore Floating Wind Turbine with Gyrostabilizer

  • P. ManmathakrishnanEmail author
  • R. Panneer Selvam
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering book series (LNCE, volume 23)

Abstract

The cyclic motion of a floating structure induces fatigue load on the floating wind turbine cause damage and trim the performance of the wind turbine. One has to minimize the pitch and roll angular motions to eradicate fatigue load and thereby mitigating the structural damage and increase the life time of the wind turbine. The ITI barge type floating wind turbine have highest fatigue load due to cyclic pitch motion in contrast with other basic types of floaters. For ITI barge the pitch motion is dominated over the roll for following and head sea, were roll is dominated for beam sea condition. A novel damping technique called gyroscopic motion counterpoise is used to reduce the pitch motion. Gyrostabilizer is used in various industries for motion stabilization, in ocean engineering it is used in ships and yachts for roll stabilization and in ocean energy converters for harvesting energy. For the first time the gyro-stabilizer is used in the floating wind turbine to damp the rotational motion. The numerical analysis is carried for ITI energy barge with gyrostabilizer supported 5-MW (National Renewable Energy Laboratory) NREL floating wind turbine. The results imply that the cyclic pitch rate is abated substantially by the gyrostabilizer.

Keywords

Offshore wind Pitch Fatigue Energy barge Beam sea Head sea Following sea Gyrostabilizer 

References

  1. 1.
    Matha D, Jonkman J (2009) Model development and loads analysis of an offshore wind turbine on a tension leg platform, with a comparison to other floating turbine concepts. NREL/SR-500-45891 February 2010Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sebastian T, Lackner M (2012) Analysis of the induction and wake evolution of an offshore floating wind turbine. Energies 5(4):968–1000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hall MTJ (2010) Mooring line modelling and design optimization of floating offshore wind turbines. MS Thesis, University of Victoria. https://dspace.library.uvic.ca/handle/1828/4636
  4. 4.
    Stewart GM (2012) Load reduction of floating wind turbines using tuned mass dampers. Master thesis, University of Massachusetts Amherst. http://scholarworks.umass.edu/theses/781/
  5. 5.
    Yang Z, Li Y (2013) Active vertical-vane control for roll motion of floating offshore wind turbine. In: 51st AIAA aerospace sciences meeting including the new horizons forum and aerospace exposition, aerospace sciences meetings, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Grapevine (Dallas/Ft. Worth Region), TexasGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Haghighi H, Jahed-Motlagh MR (2012) Ships roll stabilization via sliding mode control and gyrostabilizer. In: Proceedings of national maritime and shipping conference, vol 8, no 12, Fasc1Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zuo S, Song YD, Wang L, Song Q (2013) Computationally inexpensive approach for pitch control of offshore wind turbine on barge floating platform. Sci World J (Hindawi Publishing Corporation) 2013, Article ID 357849Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wrigley W, Hollister WM (1965) The gyroscope: theory and application. J Sci 149(3685)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sperry EA (1913) Engineering application of the gyroscopes. J Frankl Inst CLXXVGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Townsend NC, Murphy AJ, Shenoi RA (2017) A new active gyrostabiliser system for ride control of marine vehicles. J Ocean Eng 34(11–12):1607–1617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Boddiford A, Manion C, Kim KS, Radhakrishnan P, Sentis L (2013) Experiments to validate the use of a control moment gyroscope (CMG) to turn robots. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2013 international design engineering technical conferences and computers and information in engineering conference IDETC/CIE 2013, DETC2013-12285, pp V06BT07A051Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Perez T, Steinmann PD (2009) Analysis of ship rolls gyrostabilizer control. In: IFAC proceedings volumes-8th IFAC conference on manoeuvring and control of marine craft, vol 42, no 18, pp 310–315Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Perez T, Santos-Mujica M, Ruiz-Minguela JP (2009) Performance analysis and control design of a gyro-based wave energy converter. In: Proceedings of the European control conference 2009. IEE Proceedings, pp 3743–3748Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Townsend NC, Shenoi RA (2014) Control strategies for marine gyrostabilizers. IEEE J Ocean Eng 39(2):243–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fossen TI (2011) Handbook of marine craft hydrodynamics and motion control, 1st ed (Chap. 8). Wiley, 4435-36/7, Ansari road, Daryaganj, New delhi-110 002 India, pp 199–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Ocean EngineeringIndian Institute of Technology MadrasChennaiIndia

Personalised recommendations