Advertisement

Performance Evaluation of Floating Two-Body Wave Energy Converter with Hydraulic Power Take-Off System

  • Sudharsan Kalidoss
  • Arindam Banerjee
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering book series (LNCE, volume 23)

Abstract

In the present work, the dynamic coupling between a self-reacting floating two-body wave-energy converter (WEC) and hydraulic power take-off (PTO) system is evaluated. The WEC is surface meshed; the hydrodynamic properties are calculated using WAMIT, a boundary element method code. The multi-body dynamics of the WEC was analyzed using the open-source code WEC-Sim. The hydraulic PTO system considered for the present analysis is a constant pressure system with valves which rectify the flow to high-pressure and low-pressure accumulators. The heave response amplitude operator of the WEC for varying wave period shows that the float and torus have different peak heave response which makes them oscillate with a phase difference. In the combined mode, the WEC exhibits a peak heave frequency which is less than the natural frequency of the float. Various parameters that include the shaft power, absorbed power, and usable electric power for varying hydraulic motor rpm and the area of the hydraulic piston is calculated. The most probable sea state condition that exists on the US East Coast (wave height = 5.5 m and wave period = 7 s) is used for analyzing the WEC. The absorbed power of WEC initially increases with an increase in the size of the hydraulic piston. Once the WEC reached maximum absorbed power, increasing the hydraulic piston diameter decreases the absorbed power. The increase in hydraulic piston area increases the pressure energy stored in accumulators. Since the volume flow rate to the hydraulic motor is constant, increase in the area reduces the limiting velocity of the PTO system. Therefore, hydraulic motor and hydraulic piston should be chosen such a way that the PTO system will work at maximum efficiency. The maximum RPM of a hydraulic motor is determined by the size of the hydraulic piston, smaller the size of hydraulic piston lower the limit of hydraulic motor RPM and vice versa.

Keywords

Wave energy converter Hydraulic PTO system Constant pressure hydraulic system Hydraulic motor RPM PTO efficiency 

Notes

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to acknowledge the U.S. National Science Foundation for financial support for this work through the CYBERSEES program (Award # 1442858 ) and the GOALI program (Award # 1400164).

References

  1. 1.
    Drew B, Plummer A, Sahinkaya MN (2009) A review of wave energy converter technology. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part A J Power Energy 223(8):887–902CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Falnes J (2007) A review of wave-energy extraction. Mar Struct 20(4):185–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Guedes Soares C, Bhattacharjee J, Karmakar D (2014) Overview and prospects for development of wave and offshore wind energy. Brodogradnja 65(2):87–109Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Knight C et al (2014) A review of ocean energy converters, with an Australian focus. AIMS Energy 2(3):295–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mehrangiz S et al (2013) Various technologies for producing energy from wave: a review. Int J Smart Grid Clean Energy 2(2)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Morim J et al (2014) A review of wave energy estimates for nearshore shelf waters off Australia. Int J Mar Energy 7:57–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    French M (2006) On the difficulty of inventing an economical sea wave energy converter: a personal view. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part M J Eng Marit Environ 220(3):149–155MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Muliawan M et al (2011) Analysis of a two-body floating wave energy converter with particular focus on the effect of mooring system on energy capture. In: 30th international conference on ocean, Offshore and Artic engineeringGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Babarit A et al (2012) Numerical benchmarking study of a selection of wave energy converters. Renew Energy 41:44–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Falcao A (2007) Modelling and control of oscillating-body wave energy converters with hydraulic power take-off and gas accumulator. Ocean Eng 34(14):2021–2032Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Henderson R (2006) Design, simulation, and testing of a novel hydraulic power take-off system for the Pelamis wave energy converter. Renew Energy 31(2):271–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Payne GS et al (2005) Potential of digital displacement hydraulics for wave energy conversion. In: Proceedings of the sixth European wave and tidal energy conference, GlasgowGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Plummer A, Schlotter M (2009) Investigating the performance of a hydraulic power take-off. In: Proceedings of the eight European wave and tidal energy conference, UppsalaGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ricci P et al (2011) Control strategies for a wave energy converter connected to a hydraulic power take-off. IET Renew Power Gener 5(3):234–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fan Y, Mu A, Ma T (2016) Design and control of a point absorber wave energy converter with an open loop hydraulic transmission. Energy Convers Manag 121:13–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Costello R, Ringwood J, Weber J (2011) Comparison of two alternative hydraulic PTO concepts for wave energy conversion. In: Proceedings of the 9th European wave and tidal energy conference (EWTEC). School of civil engineering and the environment, University of SouthamptonGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cargo CJ et al (2012) Determination of optimal parameters for a hydraulic power take-off unit of a wave energy converter in regular waves. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part A J Power Energy 226(1):98–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Liu C et al (2015) Maximum wave power absorption by a control strategy through combining hydraulic cylinders. In: 2015 international conference on fluid power and mechatronics (FPM). IEEEGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Liu C, Yang Q, Bao G (2017) Performance investigation of a two-raft-type wave energy converter with hydraulic power take-off unit. Appl Ocean Res 62:139–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    McCormick ME (2013) Ocean wave energy conversion. Courier CorporationGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    V7.1, WAMIT Users ManualGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Lehigh UniversityBethlehemUSA

Personalised recommendations