Revalidation of Surgeons in Practice
Revalidation of surgeons in practice continues to evolve rapidly. Articulating the overall aim of revalidation as adherence to safe standards of practice, this chapter explores common goals and nuanced differences in approaches to revalidation in various countries. The different approaches are a result of disparate regulatory systems and roles of professional organizations. After describing contemporary factors affecting revalidation as an important professional consideration, its relationship to continuing professional development is explored. The author describes two types of revalidation: “Global” and “Focused.” The latter relates to changes in the practices of individual surgeons and is illustrated through three case studies. Finally, strategies to support revalidation efforts are proposed.
KeywordsRevalidation Maintenance of certification Professional practice Regulatory body Medical board Continuing professional development Patient safety Practice-based learning and improvement Quality Recertification Reentry Focused Professional Practice Evaluations Ongoing Professional Practice Evaluations Quality framework CanMEDS Continuing medical education
The opinions expressed in this chapter are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the official position of the American College of Surgeons.
- 1.Shaw, K., Cassel, C. K., Black, C., & Levinson, W. (2009). Shared medical regulation in a time of increasing calls for accountability and transparency: Comparison of recertification in the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom. Journal of the American Medical Association, 302(18), 2008–2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Kohn, L. T., Corrigan, J. M., & Donaldson, M. S. (Eds.). (2000). To err is human: Building a safer health system. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
- 6.Committee on Quality of Health Care in America, Institute of Medicine. (2001). Crossing the quality chasm: A new health system for the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
- 7.Greiner, A. C., & Knebel, E. (Eds.). (2003). Health professions education: A bridge to quality. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
- 8.Hager, M., Russell, S., & Fletcher, S. W. (2008). Continuing education in the health professions: Improving healthcare through lifelong learning. New York: Josiah Macy, Jr. Foundation.Google Scholar
- 15.Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. Milestones annual report 2016. Available at http://www.acgme.org/Portals/0/PDFs/Milestones/MilestonesAnnualReport2016.pdf. Accessed 2 May 2019.
- 16.American Board of Medical Specialties. Based on core competencies. Available at http://www.abms.org/board-certification/a-trusted-credential/based-on-core-competencies/. Accessed 2 May 2019.
- 17.The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. About CanMEDS. Available at http://www.royalcollege.ca/rcsite/canmeds/about-canmeds-e. Accessed 2 May 2019.
- 19.American Board of Medical Specialties. Continuing board certification: Vision for the future final report. Available at http://www.abms.org/media/194956/commission_final_report_20190212.pdf. Accessed 2 May 2019.
- 20.American Board of Medical Specialties. CertLink delivers longitudinal assessment online. Available at http://www.abms.org/initiatives/certlink/. Accessed 2 May 2019.
- 21.American Board of Surgery. Continuous certification. Available at http://www.absurgery.org/default.jsp?exam-moc. Accessed 2 May 2019.
- 22.American College of Surgeons. CME state requirements. Available at https://www.facs.org/education/cme/state-mandates. Accessed 2 May 2019.
- 24.Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. A concise guide to maintenance of certification. Available at http://www.royalcollege.ca/rcsite/documents/continuing-professional-development/moc-short-guide-e.pdf. Accessed 3 May 2019.
- 25.Federation of Medical Regulatory Authorities of Canada. Position statement on professional revalidation of physicians. Available at http://fmrac.ca/professional-revalidation-of-physicians/. Accessed 2 May 2019.
- 30.Federation of Surgical Specialty Associations, The Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh, The Royal College of Surgeons of England, The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Glasgow. Revalidation: Guide for surgery. January 2014.Google Scholar
- 32.The Joint Commission. (2013). Standards BoosterPak™ for focused professional practice evaluation/ongoing professional practice evaluation (FPPE/OPPE). Oakbrook Terrace, IL: The Joint Commission.Google Scholar
- 36.Bass, B. L., Polk, H. C., Jones, R. S., Townsend, C. M., Whittemore, A. D., Pellegrini, C. A., et al. (2009). Surgical privileging and credentialing: A report of a discussion and study Group of the American Surgical Association. Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 209(3), 396–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 37.American Board of Surgery. Guidelines on re-entry to surgical practice. Available on http://www.absurgery.org/default.jsp?policypracticereentry. Accessed 2 May 2019.
- 41.American College of Surgeons. Accredited education institutes. Available on https://www.facs.org/education/accreditation/aei. Accessed 2 May 2019.