Advertisement

Surgical Education: A Historical Perspective

  • Roger KneeboneEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Innovation and Change in Professional Education book series (ICPE, volume 17)

Overview

This chapter considers how the landscape of surgical education has changed over the past century and how the educational certainties of an earlier generation have been supplanted by fluidity and instability. After outlining the establishment of open surgery in the first half of the twentieth century, the chapter uses the introduction of minimally invasive (keyhole) surgery in the 1980s as a lens for examining the educational implications of surgical innovation and the processes by which such innovation can trigger educational change. At the same time, the discussion charts the emergence of professionalism of surgical education, shaped by expert perspectives from outside medicine. This has led to a broadening of methodological approaches to the investigation of educational questions and the establishment of surgical education as a scholarly field with its own identity. The chapter concludes by reflecting on the continual process by which innovation becomes established as a ‘new normal’, only to be overtaken in its turn by continuing change.

Keywords

Minimally invasive surgery Innovation Educational change Professionalism Methodology Scholarship Alder Hey Children’s Hospital John Wickham Contemporary challenges Keyhole surgery Simulation-based training Harold Shipman Expertise Complexity Scientific surgery Flexner Motor skills Surgical firms Assessment Educationalist National Health Service Intercollegiate Surgical Curriculum Project World War II Apprenticeship 

References

  1. 1.
    Spary, E. C. (1999). The performance of surgery in enlightenment France. Endeavour, 23(4), 180–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Guerrini, A. (2006). Alexander Monro primus and the moral theatre of anatomy. The Eighteenth Century, 47(1), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Flexner, A. (1910). The Flexner report on medical education in the United States and Canada. New York: Carnegie Foundation.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Imber, G. (2010). Genius on the edge: The bizarre double life of Dr. William Stewart Halsted. New York: Kaplan Publishers.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    William, B. M. (1990). Osler: A life in medicine. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Harvey, B. M. (2005). Cushing: A life in surgery. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Schlich, T., & Tang, C. L. (2016). Patient choice and the history of minimally invasive surgery. The Lancet, 388(10052), 1369–1370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kneebone, R., & Woods, A. (2014). Recapturing the history of surgical practice through simulation- based re-enactment. Medical History, 58(1), 106–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kneebone, R., & Woods, A. (2012). Bringing surgical history to life. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed), 345, e8135.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Frampton, S., & Kneebone, R. (2017). John Wickham’s new surgery: ‘Minimally invasive therapy’, innovation, and approaches to medical practice in twentieth-century Britain. Social History of Medicine, 30(3), 544–566.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Becker, H., Geer, B., Hughes, E., & Strauss, A. (1961). Boys in white. New Brunswick: Transaction Books.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bosk, C. (1979). Forgive and remember: Managing medical failure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Brooks, J. V., & Bosk, C. L. (2012). Remaking surgical socialization: Work hour restrictions, rites of passage, and occupational identity. Social Science & Medicine, 75(9), 1625–1632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cope, A., Bezemer, J., Mavroveli, S., & Kneebone, R. (2017). What attitudes and values are incorporated into self as part of professional identity construction when becoming a surgeon? Academic Medicine, 92(4), 544–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bezemer, J., Cope, A., Kress, G., & Kneebone, R. (2013). Holding the scalpel: Achieving surgical care in a learning environment. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 43(1), 38–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bezemer, J., Cope, A., Kress, G., & Kneebone, R. (2011). ‘Can I have a Johann, please?’: Changing social and cultural contexts for professional communication. Applied Linguistics Review., 2, 313–334.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bezemer, J., Kress, G., Cope, A., & Kneebone, R. (2011). Learning in the operating theatre: A social semiotic perspective. In V. Cook, C. Daly, & M. Newman (Eds.), Innovative approaches to exploring learning in and through clinical practice (pp. 125–141). Abingdon: Radcliffe.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Francis, R. (2013). Report of the mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust public inquiry. London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Surgery and CancerImperial College LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations