Advertisement

Conclusion

  • Tu Phuong Nguyen
Chapter
Part of the Critical Studies of the Asia-Pacific book series (CSAP)

Abstract

The conclusion to the book summarises its main argument, that is, the relationship between law and morality is fluid, and values derived from law and moral norms can complement and overlap with each other in workers’ claim-making. It situates the findings on Vietnamese workers within broader literature on labour resistance in post-socialist regimes and socio-legal scholarship on legal consciousness and social change. The findings of this book pave way for an analytical reframing of law in post-socialist societies. Despite many limitations in its enforcement, state law brings about social change through informing and shaping people’s expectations. This subtle effect of law does not always lead to overt actions or articulations to contest problematic practices, but is an important indication of increasing consciousness of fairness, justice, and rights.

References

  1. Chua, L. & Engel, D. (2015). State and Personhood in Southeast Asia: The Promise and Potential for Law and Society Research. Asian Journal of Law and Society, 2 (2), 211–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Diamant, N., Lubman, S. & O’Brien, K. (eds.) (2005). Engaging the Law in China: State, Society, and Possibilities for Justice. California: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Engel, D. (1998). How does Law Matter in the Constitution of Legal Consciousness?. In B. G. Garth & A. Sarat (eds.). How Does Law Matter?, Illinois: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Ewick, P. & Silbey, S. (1992). Conformity, Contestation and Resistance: An Account of Legal Consciousness. New England Law Review, 26, 731–749.Google Scholar
  5. Ewick, P. & Silbey, S. (1998). The Common Place of Law: Stories from Everyday Life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  6. Gillespie, J. & Nicholson, P. (eds.) (2005). Asian Socialism and Legal Change: The Dynamics of Vietnamese and Chinese Reform. Canberra: ANU E Press & Asia Pacific Press.Google Scholar
  7. Gillespie, J. (2011). Exploring the Limits of the Judicialization of Urban Land Disputes in Vietnam. Law and Society Review, 45 (2), 241–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. He, X. & Feng, Y. (2016). Mismatched Discourses in the Petition Offices of Chinese Courts. Law & Social Inquiry, 41 (1), 212–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. He, X., Wang, L. & Su, Y. (2013). Above the Roof, Beneath the Law: Perceived Justice behind Disruptive Tactics of Migrant Wage Claimants in China. Law & Society Review, 47 (4), 703–738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hsing, Y-T. (2010). The Great Urban Transformation: Politics of Land and Property in China. New York: Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kerkvliet, B. J. (2014). Protests over Land in Vietnam: Rightful Resistance and More. Journal of Vietnamese Studies, 9 (3), 19–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Koh, D. (2007). Modern Law, Traditional Ethics, and Contemporary Political Legitimacy in Vietnam. In S. Balmé & M. Sidel (eds.), Vietnam’s New Order: International Perspectives on the State and Reform in Vietnam. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  13. Labbé, D. (2011). Urban Destruction and Land Disputes in Periurban Hanoi During the Late-Socialist Period. Pacific Affairs, 84 (3), 435–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Li, L. (2010). Rights Consciousness and Rules Consciousness in Contemporary China. The China Journal, 64, 47–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Merry, S. E. (1990). Getting Justice and Getting Even: Legal Consciousness among Working-Class Americans. Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  16. O’Brien, K. & Li, L. (2006). Rightful Resistance in Rural China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Pei, M. (2010). Rights and resistance: The changing contexts of the dissident movement. In E. J. Perry & M. Selden (3rd ed.), Chinese Society: Change, Conflict and Resistance. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Perry, E. (2007). Studying Chinese Politics: Farewell to Revolution?. The China Journal, 57, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Pham, D. N. (2005). Confucianism and the Conception of the Law in Vietnam. In J. Gillespie & P. Nicholson (eds.). Asian Socialism and Legal Change: The Dynamics of Vietnamese and Chinese Reform. Canberra: ANU E Press & Asia Pacific Press.Google Scholar
  20. Pun, N. (2016). Migrant Labor in China: Post-Socialist Transformations. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  21. Sargeson, S. (2012). Villains, Victims and Aspiring Proprietors: Framing ‘land-losing villagers’ in China’s Strategies of Accumulation. Journal of Contemporary China, 21 (77), 757–777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Thireau, I. & Hua, L. (2003). The Moral Universe of Aggrieved Chinese Workers: Workers’ Appeals to Arbitration Committees and Letters and Visits Offices. The China Journal, 50, 83–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Yang, L. & van der Wal, Z. (2014). Rule of Morality vs. Rule of Law?. Public Integrity, 16 (2), 187–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tu Phuong Nguyen
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Governance and Public PolicyGriffith UniversityNathanAustralia

Personalised recommendations