• Craig Lambert


This chapter positions the book within the field of task-based language teaching and learning. Tasks are defined in terms of interactive, affective and societal need. Two possibilities for using tasks within second language instruction are then outlined, and the need for research on task design factors and their relationship to language development is discussed. The chapter concludes with a summary of the chapters that follow.


  1. Berman, R. (2008). The psycholinguistics of developing text construction. Journal of Child Language, 35, 775–771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bialystok, E. (1994). Analysis and control in the development of second language proficiency. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, 157–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bradshaw, J. (2013). A taxonomy of social need. In C. Cookson, S. Sainsbury, & C. Glendinning (Eds.), John Bradshaw on social policy (pp. 1–11). York, UK: University of York.Google Scholar
  4. Brown, G., & Yule, G. (1983). Teaching the spoken language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bybee, J. (2008). Usage-based grammar and second language acquisition. In P. Robinson & N. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 216–236). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. DeKeyser, R. (2007). Skill acquisition theory. In B. Van Patten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (pp. 97–113). Mahwah, NJ: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Dewey, J. (1913). Interest and effort in education. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  9. Ellis, N. (2002). Frequency effects in language processing: A review with implications for theories for implicit and explicit language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 143–188.Google Scholar
  10. Ellis, N. (2008). Usage-based and form-focused language acquisition: The associative learning of constructions, learned attention and the limited L2 endstate. In P. Robinson & E. Nick (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 372–405). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Ellis, R. (2009). Task-based language teaching: Sorting out the misunderstandings. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 19, 221–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ellis, R. (2018). Reflections on task-based language teaching. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ellis, R., & Shintani, N. (2014). Exploring language pedagogy through second language acquisition research. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Eskildsen, S. (2008). Constructing another language: Usage-based linguistics in second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 30, 335–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kormos, J. (2006). Speech production and second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Lambert, C. (2004). Reverse-engineering communication tasks. ELT Journal, 58, 18–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lambert, C. (2010). Task-based needs analysis: Putting principles into practice. Language Teaching Research, 14, 99–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lambert, C. (2017). Tasks, affect and second language performance. Language Teaching Research, 21, 657–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lambert, C. (2018). Tasks vs. exercises. In TESOL encyclopedia of English language teaching. Malden, MA: Wiley/Blackwell.Google Scholar
  21. Lambert, C., Philp, J., & Nakamura, S. (2017). Learner-generated content and engagement in L2 task performance. Language Teaching Research, 21, 665–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lambert, C., & Zhang, G. (2018). Engagement in the use of English and Chinese as second languages: The role of learner-generated content in instructional task design. Modern Language Journal.Google Scholar
  23. Levelt, W. (1989). Speaking from intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  24. Levelt, W. (1999). Producing the language: A blueprint of the speaker. In C. Brown & P. Hagoort (Eds.), The neurocognition of language (pp. 83–122). New York: Oxford Press.Google Scholar
  25. Long, M. (1985). A role for instruction in second language acquisition: Task-based language teaching. In K. Hyltenstam & M. Pienemann (Eds.), Modelling and assessing second language acquisition (pp. 77–99). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  26. Long, M. (2000). Focus on form in task-based language teaching. In R. Lambert & E. Shohamy (Eds.), Language policy and pedagogy (pp. 181–196). Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
  27. Long, M. (2015). Second language acquisition and task-based language teaching. Oxford, UK: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
  28. Long, M., & Crookes, G. (1993). Units of analysis in syllabus design: The case for the task. In G. Crookes & S. Gass (Eds.), Tasks in a pedagogical context (pp. 9–44). Cleveland, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  29. Long, M., & Robinson, P. (1998). Focus on form: Theory, research, and practice. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 15–41). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  30. MacWhinney, B. (2001). The competition model: The input, the context, and the brain. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 69–90). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. MacWhinney, B. (2008). A unified model. In P. Robinson & N. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 341–371). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  32. Maehr, M. (1984). Meaning and motivation: Toward a theory of personal investment. In R. Ames & C. Ames (Eds.), Motivation in education: Student motivation (Vol. 1, pp. 115–144). San Diego, CA: Academic.Google Scholar
  33. Paradis, M. (1994). Neurolinguistic aspects of implicit and explicit memory: Implications for bilingualism and SLA. In N. Ellis (Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languages (pp. 393–419). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  34. Paradis, M. (2004). A neurolinguistic theory of bilingualism. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Robinson, P. (2001). Task complexity, cognitive resources and second language syllabus design. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 287–318). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Robinson, P. (2011a). Task-based language learning: A review of the issues. Language Learning, 61(Suppl. 1), 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Robinson, P. (2011b). Second language task complexity, the cognition hypothesis, language learning and performance. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Second language task complexity: Researching the cognition hypothesis of language learning and performance (pp. 3–37). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sabet, P., & Zhang, G. (2015). Communicating through vague language: A comparative study of L1 and L2 speakers. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Schmid, M., Verspoor, M., & MacWhinney, B. (2011). Coding and extracting data. In M. Verspoor, K. de Bot, & W. Lowie (Eds.), A dynamic approach to second language development: Methods and techniques (pp. 39–54). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Shintani, N. (2016). Input-based tasks in foreign language instruction for young learners. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Skehan, P. (1996). A framework for the implementation of task-based learning. Applied Linguistics, 17, 38–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Skehan, P. (2009). Modeling second language performance: Integrating complexity, accuracy, fluency and lexis. Applied Linguistics, 30, 510–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Skehan, P. (2014). Processing perspectives on task performance. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Skehan, P., Xiaoyue, B., Qian, L., & Wang, Z. (2012). The task is not enough: Processing approaches to task-based performance. Language Teaching Research, 16, 170–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Suzuki, Y., & DeKeyser, R. (2015). Comparing elicited imitation and word monitoring as measures of implicit knowledge. Language Learning, 65, 860–895.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Tomasello, M. (2000a). First steps toward a usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cognitive Linguistics, 11, 61–82.Google Scholar
  47. Tomasello, M. (2000b). The item-based nature of children’s early syntactic development. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 156–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. White, R., & Robinson, P. (1995). Current approaches to syllabus design: A discussion with Ron White. Guidelines, 17, 93–101.Google Scholar
  49. Yule, G. (1997). Referential communication tasks. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Craig Lambert
    • 1
  1. 1.Curtin UniversityPerthAustralia

Personalised recommendations