External Representations and the Design of Seamless Learning Systems
- 234 Downloads
Current trends in technology-enhanced learning highlight the increasing importance of mobile digital tools in learning scenarios; seamless learning, or learning that spans contexts and activities within and without the classroom, is becoming mainstream. Despite the growing body of the literature in this area, this chapter highlights a general focus on technological issues and perspectives and a lack of theoretically driven discussion. We argue that theoretically/conceptually inspired literature reviews covering pedagogy and cognitive aspects of learning are currently needed to establish a grounded framework for future research in this area. This paper contributes one such analysis—it proposes and reflects on the issues raised when considering seamless learning from the perspective of the established literature on external representations (ERs), a core concept in distributed or embodied accounts of cognition. Core issues we discuss are: (a) what are the challenges facing seamless learning from an ERs perspective? (b) how can knowledge about ERs be applied to seamless learning systems?, and (c) what methodological challenges will emerge if seamless learning systems are studied from the perspective of ERs? This discussion is intended as a bridge between practical and applied work in seamless learning and theoretical or laboratory-based work in ERs—it seeks to drive the field of seamless learning forward by highlighting best practices from an established theoretical perspective. By elaborating on a theoretically grounded lens, we seek to empower researchers to identify promising approaches for the design and evaluation of next-generation high impact seamless learning solutions.
KeywordsSeamless learning Distributed cognition Embodied cognition External representations
- Ainsworth, S. (1999b). Designing effective multi-representational learning systems. Nottingham: Centre for Research in Development, Instruction and Training, School of Psychology, University of Nottingham.Google Scholar
- Ainsworth, S., Bibby, P. A., & Wood, D. (1998). Analysing the costs and benefits of multi-representational learning environments. In M. W. van Someren, P. Reimann, H. P. A. Boshuizen, & T. de Jon (Eds.), Learning with multiple representations (pp. 120–136). Amsterdam: Pergamon.Google Scholar
- Boucheix, J.-M., Lowe, R. K., Putri, D. K., & Groff, J. (2013). Cueing animations: Dynamic signaling aids information extraction and comprehension. Learning and Instruction, 25(C), 71–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.11.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Burigat, S., Chittaro, L., & Parlato, E. (2008). Map, diagram, and web page navigation on mobile devices: The effectiveness of zoomable user interfaces with overviews. Presented at the Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (pp. 147–156). ACM.Google Scholar
- Chan, T.-W., Roschelle, J., Hsi, S., Kinshuk, K., Sharples, M., Brown, T., … Milrad, M. (2006). One-to-one technology-enhanced learning: An opportunity for global research collaboration. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 1(1), 3–29. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793206806000032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Cheng, P. C. H. (1998). Law encoding diagrams as support for science learning. Z. Padagog. Psychol., 12(2–3), 100–111.Google Scholar
- Cox, R., & Brna, P. (1994). Analytical reasoning with external representations: Supporting the stages of selection, construction and use. University of Edinburgh Department of Artificial Intelligence.Google Scholar
- de Jong, T., Ainsworth, S., Dobson, M., van der Hulst, A., Levonen, J., Reimann, P., … Swaak, J. (1998). Acquiring knowledge in science and mathematics: The use of multiple representations in technology-based learning environments. In M. W. Van Someren, P. Reimann, H. P. A. Boshuizen, & T. de Jong (Eds.), Learning with multiple representations. Amsterdam: Pergamon.Google Scholar
- Dillenbourg, P., & Betrancourt, M. (2006). Collaborative load. In J. Elen & R. E. Clark (Eds.), Handling complexity in learning environments: Theory and research. Oxford, UK: Emerald Group Publishing.Google Scholar
- Harrison, S., & Dourish, P. (1996). Re-place-ing space: The roles of place and space in collaborative systems. In Proceedings of the 1996 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 67–76). Boston, MA, USA: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/240080.240193.
- Hollan, J., Hutchins, E., & Kirsh, D. (2002). Distributed cognition: Toward a new foundation for human-computer interaction research. In R. Shaw & J. Bransford (Eds.), Human-computer interaction in the new millenium (pp. 75–94). New York: ACM Press.Google Scholar
- Hornecker, E., & Buur, J. (2006). Getting a grip on tangible interaction: A framework on physical space and social interaction. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 437–446). New York, NY, USA: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1124772.1124838.
- Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Bradford: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Ishii, H., & Ullmer, B. (1997). Tangible bits: Towards seamless interfaces between people, bits and atoms. Presented at the Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 234–241). ACM.Google Scholar
- Kohen-Vacs, D., & Ronen, M. (2015). Fragmented yet seamless: System integration for supporting cross-context CSCL scripts. In L.-H Wong, M. Milrad & M. Specht (Eds.), Seamless learning in the age of mobile connectivity (pp. 439–452). Singapore: Springer.Google Scholar
- Marshall, P. (2007). Do tangible interfaces enhance learning? In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Tangible and Embedded Interaction (pp. 163–170). New York, NY, USA: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1226969.1227004.
- Otero, N., Rogers, Y., & Du Boulay, B. (2001). Is interactivity a good thing? Assessing its benefits for learning. In M. Smith & G. Salvendy (Eds.), Systems, social and internationalization design aspects of human-computer interaction (pp. 790–794). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Otero, N., Müller, M., Alissandrakis, A., & Milrad, M. (2013). Exploring video-based interactions around digital public displays to foster curiosity about science in schools. Presented at the Proceedings of ACM International Symposium on Pervasive Displays (pp. 4–5).Google Scholar
- Palmer, S. E. (1977). Fundamental aspects of cognitive representation. In E. Rosch & B. B. Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and categorization. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Rogers, Y., & Price, S. (2009). How mobile technologies are changing the way children learn. In A. Druin (Ed.), Mobile technology for children (pp. 3–22). San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.Google Scholar
- Rogers, Y., & Rodden, T. (2003). Configuring spaces and surfaces to support collaborative interactions. In Public and situated displays (pp. 45–79). Dordrecht: Springer. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-94-017-2813-3_3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rogers, Y., & Scaife, M. (1998). How can interactive multimedia facilitate learning? In J. Lee (Ed.), Intelligence and multimodality in multimedia interfaces: Research applications. Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press.Google Scholar
- Rossitto, C., & Eklundh, K. S. (2007). Managing work at several places: A case of project work in a nomadic group of students. In Proceedings of the 14th European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics: Invent! Explore! (pp. 45–51). New York, NY, USA: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1362550.1362562.
- Salomon, G. (1993a). Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Salomon, G. (1993b). No distribution without individuals’ cognition: A dynamical interactional view. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 111–138). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Sawyer, R. K., & Greeno, J. G. (2009). Situativity and learning. In P. Robbins & M. Aydede (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of situated cognition (pp. 347–367). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Sharples, M., Arnedillo-Sánchez, I., Milrad, M., & Vavoula, G. (2009). Mobile learning. In Technology-enhanced learning (pp. 233–249). Dordrecht: Springer. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-4020-9827-7_14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sharples, M., Milrad, M., Arnedillo-Sanchez, I., & Vavoula, G. (2009b). Mobile learning: Small devices, big issues. In N. Balacheff, S. Ludvigsen, T. de Jong, A. Lazonder, & S. Barnes (Eds.), Technology enhanced learning: Principles and products (pp. 233–249). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sollervall, H., Otero, N., Milrad, M., Johansson, D., & Vogel, B. (2012). Outdoor activities for the learning of mathematics: Designing with mobile technologies for transitions across learning contexts. In 2012 IEEE Seventh International Conference on Wireless, Mobile and Ubiquitous Technology in Education (WMUTE) (pp. 33–40). IEEE.Google Scholar
- Sung, Y.-T., Chang, K.-E., & Liu, T.-C. (2016). The effects of integrating mobile devices with teaching and learning on students’ learning performance: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. Computers & Education, 94(Suppl. C), 252–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wong, L.-H. (2015). A brief history of mobile seamless learning. In Seamless learning in the age of mobile connectivity (pp. 3–40). Singapore: Springer. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-981-287-113-8_1.Google Scholar