Advertisement

Seamless Writing: How the Digitisation of Writing Transforms Thinking, Communication, and Student Learning

  • Otto Kruse
  • Christian RappEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Lecture Notes in Educational Technology book series (LNET)

Abstract

This chapter extends the scope of the term ‘seamless learning’ to include writing as one of the most prominent learning activities in education. The seamless learning concept is used to analyse the ongoing flow of digital innovation with respect to the changing instructional and intellectual positioning of writing in its various contexts. The term ‘seams’ is interpreted as frictions or barriers in the writer’s experience, and the concept of ‘seamlessness’ refers to coherence in the practice and learning of writing. In order to understand the impact of digitisation on writing, this chapter recaps on the major development steps of digital writing technology, before offering an example of an integrated learning platform for the writing of academic theses which intends to offer students a seamless writing experience. The results indicate that the term seamlessness in the context of writing should not be directly associated with mobile learning or to the ubiquitous learning opportunities which are qualities that writing technologies have already offered for some time. Other more recent technological changes have provided considerably greater impact on what the authors term as ‘seamless writing’.

Keywords

Writing technology Student writing Digitisation Thesis writing Research cycle Learning to write 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was conducted within the Seamless Learning Lab (www.seamless-learning.eu). IBH-Labs were created on the initiative of the International Lake Constance University (IBH) and the International Lake Constance Conference (IBK), and are funded by the “Alpenrhein-Bodensee-Hochrhein” Interreg V programme.

References

  1. Allen, L. K., Jacovina, M. E., & McNamara, D. S. (2015). Computer-based writing instruction. In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 316–329). New York: The Guildford Press.Google Scholar
  2. Berge, Z. L., & Muilenburg, L. (Eds.). (2013). Handbook of mobile learning. Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Chan, T.-W. (2015). Foreword: Removing seams by linking and blurring. In L. H. Wong, M. Milrad, & M. Specht (Eds.), Seamless learning in the age of mobile connectivity (pp. v–xiv). Singapore: Springer.Google Scholar
  4. Chan, T.-W., Roschelle, J., Hsi, S., Kinshuk, Sharples, M., Brown, T., … Hoppe, U. (2006). One-to-one technology-enhanced learning: An opportunity for global research collaboration. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 1(1), 3–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cotos, E. (2015). Automated writing analysis for writing pedagogy: From healthy tension to tangible prospects. Writing and Pedagogy, 7(2–3), 197–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  7. Emig, J. (1971). The composing process of twelfth graders. Urbana: National Council of Teachers of English.Google Scholar
  8. Gülbahar, Y., Rapp, C., Kilis, S., & Sitnikova, A. (2017). Enriching higher education with social media: Development and evaluation of a social media toolkit. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(1), 23–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kruse, O. (2016). Wissenschaftliches schreiben forschungsorientiert unterrichten. In A. Hirsch-Weber & S. Scherer (Eds.), Neue Herausforderungen der Schreibforschung (pp. 29–54). Wiesbaden: Springer Spektrum.Google Scholar
  10. Kuh, G. D. (1996). Guiding principles for creating seamless learning environments for undergraduates. College Student Development, 37(2), 135–148.Google Scholar
  11. Langer, J. A., & Applebee, A. N. (1987). How writing shapes thinking: A study of teaching and learning. Urbana, Ill: NCTE.Google Scholar
  12. Mahlow, C., & Dale, R. (2014). Production media: Writing as using tools in media convergent environments. In E.-M. Jakobs & D. Perrin (Eds.), Handbook of writing and text production (pp. 209–230). Berlin: DeGruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
  13. Nesi, H., & Gardner, S. (2012). Genres across the disciplines: Student writing in higher education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Ong, W. (1982/2002). Orality and literacy: The technologizing of the word. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Poe, M., Lerner, N., & Craig, J. (2010). Learning to communicate in science and engineering: Case studies. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  16. Rapp, C., & Kauf, P. (2018). Scaling academic writing instruction: Evaluation of a scaffolding tool (Thesis Writer). International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-017-0162-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Rapp, C., & Kruse, O. (2016). Thesis Writer (TW): Tapping scale effects in academic writing instruction (demonstration). In Proceedings of the Third (2016) ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale (pp. 325–326). New York, NY, USA: ACM.Google Scholar
  18. Rapp, C., Kruse, O., Erlemann, J., & Ott, J. (2015). Thesis Writer: A system for supporting academic writing. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference Companion on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (pp. 57–60). New York: ACM.  https://doi.org/10.1145/2685553.2702687.
  19. Richardson, W. (2010). Blogs, wikis, podcasts, and other powerful web tools for classrooms. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.Google Scholar
  20. Sharples, M. (2015). Seamless learning despite context. In L.-H. Wong,·M. Milrad, & M. Specht (Eds.), Seamless learning in the age of mobile connectivity (pp. 41–55). Singapore: Springer.Google Scholar
  21. Sharples, M., & Pemberton, L. (1990). Starting from the writer: Guidelines for the design of user-centred document processors. Computer Assisted Language Learning (CALL), 2(1), 37–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Walvoord, B. E. F., & McCarthy, L. P. (Eds.). (1990). Thinking and writing in college: A naturalistic study of students in four disciplines. Urbana: National Council of Teachers of English.Google Scholar
  23. Wong, L.-H. (2012). A learner-centric view of mobile seamless learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(1), E19–E23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Wong, L.-H. (2015). A brief history of mobile seamless learning. In L.-H. Wong,·M. Milrad, & M. Specht (Eds.), Seamless learning in the age of mobile connectivity (pp. 3–39). Singapore: Springer.Google Scholar
  25. Wong, L.-H., & Looi, C.-K. (2011). What seams do we remove in mobile assisted seamless learning? A critical review of the literature. Computers & Education, 57(4), 2364–2381.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2012.745424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Applied LinguisticsLanguage Competence Centre, Zurich University of Applied Sciences, ZHAWWinterthurSwitzerland
  2. 2.Department of Management and LawCenter for Innovative Teaching and Learning, Zurich University of Applied Sciences, ZHAW, SML, ZIDWinterthurSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations