Advertisement

Concrete Universals

  • Bo R. Meinertsen
Chapter
Part of the Philosophical Studies Series book series (PSSP, volume 136)

Abstract

As mentioned in Chap.  1, I am inclined to believe that naturalism is true. This metaphysical view requires that every existent be concrete (or non-abstract), i.e. spatially and/or temporally located.

References

  1. Armstrong, D. M. (1988). Can a naturalist believe in universals? In E. Ullmann-Margalit (Ed.), Science in reflection (pp. 103–115). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Butchvarov, P. (1979). Being qua being: A theory of identity, existence, and predication. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Ehring, D. (2002). Spatial relations between universals. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 80, 17–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Grossmann, R. (1992). The existence of the world: An introduction to ontology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Hoffman, J., & Rosenkrantz, G. (1997). Substance: Its nature and existence. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hoffman, R. (1972). On begging the question at any time. Analysis, 32, 51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Lowe, E. J. (1998). The possibility of metaphysics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  8. MacBride, F. (1998). Where are particulars and universals? Dialectica, 52, 203–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Magalhães, E. (2006). Armstrong on the spatio-temporality of universals. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 84, 301–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Moreland, J. P. (2001). Universals. Chesham: Acumen.Google Scholar
  11. Simons, P. (1987). Parts: A study in ontology. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  12. Simons, P. (2010). Relations and truthmaking. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume, 84, 199–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Simons, P. (2014). Relations and idealism: On some arguments of Hochberg against trope nominalism. Dialectica, 68, 305–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Strawson, P. F. (1959). Individuals. London: Methuen & Co.Google Scholar
  15. Tegtmeier, E. (1992). Grundzüge einer kategorialen Ontologie. München: Verlag Karl Alber Freiburg.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bo R. Meinertsen
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyTongji UniversityShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations