Advertisement

Bare Particulars

  • Bo R. MeinertsenEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Philosophical Studies Series book series (PSSP, volume 136)

Abstract

States of affairs are complexes that are instantiations of properties or relations by particulars. The nature of these particulars in states of affairs qua constituents of states of affairs is the topic of this chapter.

References

  1. Alston, W. (1954). Particulars—Bare and qualified. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 15, 253–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Armstrong, D. M. (1978). Universals and scientific realism (2 vols.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Armstrong, D. M. (1988). Can a naturalist believe in universals? In E. Ullmann-Margalit (Ed.), Science in reflection (pp. 103–115). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Armstrong, D. M. (1989b). Universals: An opinionated introduction. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  5. Armstrong, D. M. (1997). A world of states of affairs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barker, R. (1967). Particulars: Bare, naked, and nude. Noûs, 1, 211–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bergmann, G. (1967). Realism: A critique of Brentano and Meinong. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  8. Black, M. (1952). The identity of indiscernibles. Mind, 61, 153–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Campbell, K. (1990). Abstract particulars. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  10. Davis, R. B. (2003). ‘Partially Clad’ bare particulars exposed. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 81, 534–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Denkel, A. (1992). The refutation of substrata. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 61, 421–429.Google Scholar
  12. Hochberg, H. (1965). Universals, particulars, and predication. Philosophical Review, 19, 87–101.Google Scholar
  13. Hoffman, R. (1972). On begging the question at any time. Analysis, 32, 51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. LaBossiere, M. C. (1994). Substances and substrata. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 72, 360–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Loux, M. J. (1978). Substance and attribute. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Loux, M. J. (1998). Metaphysics: A contemporary introduction. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Macdonald, C. (1998). Tropes and other things. In S. Laurence & C. Macdonald (Eds.), Contemporary readings in the foundations of metaphysics (pp. 329–350). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  18. Meinertsen, B. R. (2018b). Mellor’s question. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  19. Mertz, D. W. (1996). Moderate realism and its logic. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Mertz, D. W. (2001). Individuation and instance ontology. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 79, 45–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mertz, D. W. (2003). Against bare particulars: Response to Moreland and Pickavance. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 81, 14–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Moreland, J. P., & Pickavance, T. (2003). Bare particulars and individuation: A reply to Mertz. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 81, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. O’Leary-Hawthorne, J. (1995). The bundle theory of substance and the identity of indiscernibles. Analysis, 55, 191–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Perovic, K. (2017). Bare particulars laid bare. Acta Analytica, 32, 277–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Persson, J. (1997). Causal facts. Lund: Library of Theoria.Google Scholar
  26. Pickavance, T. (2009). In defence of ‘Partially Clad’ bare particulars. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 87, 155–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Robinson, R. (1971). Begging the question, 1971. Analysis, 31, 113–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Simons, P. (1994). Particulars in particular clothing: Three trope theories of substance. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 54, 553–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Vallicella, W. F. (1997a). Bundles and Indiscernability: A reply to O’Leary- Hawthorne’. Analysis, 57, 91–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Van Cleve, J. (1985). Three versions of the bundle theory. Philosophical Studies, 47, 95–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyTongji UniversityShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations