Advertisement

Intersphincteric Resection for Rectal Adenocarcinoma Near the Anus

  • Yoshito AkagiEmail author
  • Fumihiko Fujita
Chapter

Abstract

Abdominoperineal resection (APR) is commonly performed as radical surgical treatment for low rectal cancer near the anus. To improve the postoperative quality of life (QOL), various sphincter-saving operations have been developed. In particular, intersphincteric resection (ISR) was devised as a new concept of sphincter-saving operation. Current protocols now focus on ISR, which differs from conventional hand-sewn coloanal anastomosis (CAA) after ultimate low anterior resection (LAR). However, the efficacy of ISR remains unclear. In this report, the surgical, oncological, and functional outcomes after ISR are reviewed. This review of the literature was conducted by searching the PubMed online database. Articles focusing on conventional hand-sewn CAA were excluded from this study. The mean mortality rate was <2%, and the mean morbidity rate ranged from 7.5 to 38.3%. The mean local recurrence rate has varied widely from 0 to 22.7%. The mean disease-free survival rate was 69–86 months, and the overall 5-year survival rate was 76–97 months. The functional outcomes have not been excellent but were generally acceptable, although the resting pressure gradually recovered with time. An accurate evaluation of the outcomes is extremely difficult due to the difference among individuals and the absence of any unified appraisal methods. ISR appears to be surgically, oncologically, and functionally acceptable. However, more experience and knowledge of the oncology, anal physiology, and pelvic anatomy are necessary to achieve successful outcomes without complications, and to improve patient survival.

Keywords

Intersphincteric resection (ISR) Intersphincteric space (ISS) Coloanal anastomosis (CAA) Low rectal cancer 

References

  1. 1.
    Parks AG. Transanal technique in low rectal anastomosis. Proc R Soc Med. 1972;65:975–6.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Schiessel R, Karner-Hanusch J, Herbst F, Teleky B, Wunderlich M. Intersphincteric resection for low rectal tumors. Br J Surg. 1994;81:1376–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rullier E, Zerbib F, Laurent C, Bonnel C, Caudry M, Saric J, et al. Intersphincteric resection with excision of internal anal sphincter for conservative treatment of very low rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 1999;42:1168–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Shirouzu K, Ogata Y, Araki Y, Kishimoto Y, Sato Y. A new ultimate anus-preserving operation for extremely low rectal cancer and for anal canal cancer. Tech Coloproctol. 2003;7:203–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Saito N, Ono M, Sugito M, Ito M, Morihiro M, Kosugi C, et al. Early results of intersphincteric resection for patients with very low rectal cancer: an active approach to avoid a permanent colostomy. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004;47:459–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lyttle JA, Parks AG. Intersphincteric excision of the rectum. Br J Surg. 1977;64:413–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yamada K, Ogata S, Saiki Y, Fukunaga M, Tsuji Y, Takano M. Functional results of intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2007;94:1272–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Heald RJ, Husband EM, Ryall RD. Mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery: the clue to pelvic recurrence. Br J Surg. 1982;69:613–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Köhler A, Athanasiadis S, Ommer A, Psarakis E. Long-term results of low anterior resection with intersphincteric anastomosis in carcinoma of the lower one-third of the rectum. Dis Colon Rectum. 2000;43:843–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schiessel R, Novi G, Holzer B, Rosen HR, Renner K, Hölbling N, et al. Technique and long-term results of intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2005;48:1858–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Saito N, Moriya Y, Shirouzu K, Maeda K, Mochizuki H, Koda K, et al. Intersphincteric resection in patients with very low rectal cancer: a review of the Japanese experience. Dis Colon Rectum. 2006;49:S13–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chin CC, Yeh CY, Huang WS, Wang JY. Clinical outcome of intersphincteric resection for ultra-low rectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2006;12:640–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chamlou R, Parc Y, Simon T, Bennis M, Dehni N, Park R, et al. Long-term results of intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer. Ann Surg. 2007;246:916–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Krand O, Yalti T, Tellioglu G, Kara M, Berber I, Titiz MI. Use of smooth muscle plasty after intersphincteric rectal resection to replace a partially resected internal anal sphincter: long-term follow-up. Dis Colon Rectum. 2009;52:1895–901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Han JG, Wei GH, Gao ZG, Zheng Y, Wang ZJ. Intersphincteric resection with direct coloanal anastomosis for ultralow rectal cancer: the experience of People’s Republic of China. Dis Colon Rectum. 2009;52:950–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Vorobiev GI, Odaryuk TS, Tsarkov PV, Talalakin AI, Rybakov EG. Resection of the rectum and total excision of the internal anal sphincter with smooth muscle plasty and colonic pouch for treatment of ultralow rectal carcinoma. Br J Surg. 2004;91(11):1506–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Saito N, Ito M, Kobayashi A, Nishizawa Y, Kojima M, Nishizawa Y, Sugito M. Long-term outcomes after intersphincteric resection for low-lying rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21(11):3608–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Renner K, Rosen H, Novi G, Hölbling N, Schiessel R. Quality of life after surgery for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 1999;42:1160–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Barisic G, Markovic V, Popovic M, Dimitrijevic I, Gavrilovic P, Krivokapic Z. Function after intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer and its influence on quality of life. Colorectal Dis. 2011;13:638–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Matzel KE, Bittorf B, Günther K, Stadelmaier U, Hohenberger W. Rectal resection with low anastomosis: functional outcome. Colorectal Dis. 2003;5:458–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ito M, Saito N, Sugito M, Kobayashi A, Nishizawa Y, Tsunoda Y. Analysis of clinical factors associated with anal function after intersphincteric resection for very low rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2009;52:64–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Denost Q, Laurent C, Capdepont M, Zerbib F, Rullier E. Risk factors for fecal incontinence after intersphincteric resection for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2011;54:963–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rullier E, Laurent C, Bretagnol F, Rullier A, Vendrely V, Zerbib F. Sphincter-saving resection for all rectal carcinomas: the end of the 2 cm distal rule. Ann Surg. 2005;241:465–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hohenberger W, Merkel S, Matzel K, Bittorf B, Papadopoulos T, Gohl J. The influence of abdomino-perianal (intersphincteric) resection of lower third rectal carcinoma on the rates of sphincter preservation and locoregional recurrence. Colorectal Dis. 2006;8:23–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Portier G, Ghouti L, Kirzin S, Guimbaud R, Rives M, Lazorthes F. Oncological outcome of ultra-low coloanal anastomosis with and without intersphincteric resection for low rectal adenocarcinoma. Br J Surg. 2007;94:341–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Saito N, Sugito M, Ito M, Kobayashi A, Nishizawa Y, Yoneyama Y, et al. Oncologic outcome of intersphincteric resection for very low rectal cancer. World J Surg. 2009;33:1750–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Akagi Y, Kinugasa T, Shirouzu K. Intersphincteric resection for very low rectal cancer: a systematic review. Surg Today. 2013;43(8):838–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kanso F, Maggiori L, Debove C, Chau A, Ferron M, Panis Y. Perineal or abdominal approach first during intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: which is the best strategy? Dis Colon Rectum. 2015;58(7):637–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Beets-Tan RG, Lettinga T, Beets GL. Pre-operative imaging of rectal cancer and its impact on surgical performance and treatment outcome. Eur. J Surg Oncol. 2005;31:681–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Rullier E, Laurent C, Carles J, Saric J, Michel P, Parneix M. Local recurrence of low rectal cancer after abdominoperineal and anterior resection. Br J Surg. 1997;84:525–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Nagamatsu Y, Shirouzu K, Isomoto H, Ogata Y, Tsuchida I, Akagi Y. Surgical treatment of lower rectal cancer with sphincter preservation using handsewn coloanal anastomosis. Surg Today. 1998;28:696–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Guillem JG, Chessin DB, Shia J, Suriawinata A, Riedel E, Moore HG, et al. A prospective pathologic analysis using whole-mount sections of rectal cancer following preoperative combined modality therapy: implications for sphincter preservation. Ann Surg. 2007;245:88–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    McArdle CS, McMillan DC, Hole DJ. Impact of anastomotic leakage on long-term survival of patients undergoing curative resection for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2005;92(9):1150–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Ortiz H, Armendariz P. Anterior resection: do the patients perceive any clinical benefit? Int J Colorectal Dis. 1996;11:191–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kakodkar R, Gupta S, Nundy S. Low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: functional assessment and factors affecting outcome. Colorectal Dis. 2006;8:650–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Kirwan WO, Turnbull RB Jr, Fazio VW, Weakley FL. Pullthrough operation with delayed anastomosis for rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 1978;65:695–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Jorge JM, Wexner SD. Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 1993;36:77–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Beersiek F, Parks AG, Swash M. Pathogenesis of ano-rectal incontinence. A histometric study of the anal sphincter musculature. J Neurol Sci. 1979;42:111–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Nicholls RJ, Lubowski DZ, Donaldson DR. Comparison of colonic reservoir and straight colo-anal reconstruction after rectal excision. Br J Surg. 1988;75:318–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Parks AG, et al. Resection and sutured colo-anal anastomosis for rectal carcinoma. Br J Surg. 1982;69:301–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Hallböök O, Påhlman L, Krog M, Wexner SD, Sjödahl R. Randomized comparison of straight and colonic J pouch anastomosis after low anterior resection. Ann Surg. 1996;224:58–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Tilney HS, Tekkis PP. Extending the horizons of restorative rectal surgery: intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis. 2008;10:3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Lewis WG, Holdsworth PJ, Stephenson BM, Finan PJ, Johnston D. Role of the rectum in the physiological and clinical results of coloanal and colorectal anastomosis after anterior resection for rectal carcinoma. Br J Surg. 1992;79:1082–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Vernava AM III, Moran M, Rothenberger DA, Wong WD. A prospective evaluation of distal margins in carcinoma of the rectum. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1992;175:333–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Shirouzu K, Isomoto H, Kakegawa T. Distal spread of rectal cancer and optimal distal margin of resection for sphincter-preserving surgery. Cancer. 1995;76:388–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Andreola S, Leo E, Belli F, Lavarino C, Bufalino R, Tomasic G, et al. Distal intramural spread in adenocarcinoma of the lower third of the rectum treated with total rectal resection and coloanal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum. 1997;40:25–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Moore HG, Riedel E, Minsky BD, Saltz L, Paty P, Wong D, et al. Adequacy of 1-cm distal margin after restorative rectal cancer resection with sharp mesorectal excision and preoperative combined-modality therapy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2003;10:80–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Kuvshinoff B, Maghfoor I, Miedema B, Bryer M, Westgate S, Wilkes J, et al. Distal margin requirements after preoperative chemoradiotherapy for distal rectal carcinomas: are < or = 1 cm distal margins sufficient? Ann Surg Oncol. 2001;8:163–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Nagtegaal ID, Quirke P. What is the role for the circumferential margin in the modern treatment of rectal cancer? J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:303–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Salerno G, Daniels IR, Brown G, Norman AR, Moran BJ, Heald RJ. Variations in pelvic dimensions do not predict the risk of circumferential resection margin (CRM) involvement in rectal cancer. World J Surg. 2007;31(6):1313–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Dent OF, Chapuis PH, Haboubi N, Bokey L. Magnetic resonance imaging cannot predict histological tumour involvement of a circumferential surgical margin in rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis. 2011;13:974–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Tsukasa H, Hiroki Y. Laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: review of published literature 2000–2009. Surg Today. 2011;41:1583–159138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Kim CH, Lee SY, Kim HR, Kim YJ. Factors associated with oncologic outcomes following abdominoperineal or intersphincteric resection in patients treated with preoperative chemotherapy. A propensity score analysis. Medicine. 2015;94:e2060–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Chen H, Ma B, Gao P, Wang H, Song Y, Tong L, Li P, Wang Z. Laparoscopic intersphincteric resection versus an open approach for low rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. World J Surg Oncol. 2017;15(1):229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Weiser MR, Quah HM, Shia J, Guillem JG, Paty PB, Temple LK, et al. Sphincter preservation in low rectal cancer is facilitated by preoperative chemoradiation and intersphincteric dissection. Ann Surg. 2009;249:236–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SurgeryKurume University School of MedicineKurumeJapan

Personalised recommendations