Advertisement

Endoscopic Resection of Early Colorectal Cancer

  • Masayoshi Yamada
  • Yutaka SaitoEmail author
  • Stefano Sansone
  • Hiroyuki Takamaru
  • Taku Sakamoto
Chapter

Abstract

Endoscopic diagnosis and treatments have made considerable progress in recent years. Endoscopic diagnosis aims to predict oncological characteristics of a lesion based on endoscopic features and also differentiate between malignant and benign tumors. Detailed inspection of lesions is required in order to pursue an accurate endoscopic diagnosis. This can be achieved with image enhanced endoscopy.

Multiple strategies are available to achieve endoscopic resection of colorectal lesions, including polypectomy, endoscopic mucosal resection, endoscopic mucosal dissection, and full-thickness resection.

Each technique requires different skill-sets and has different frequency of complications. Selection of the appropriate endoscopic treatment is based on oncological indication and technical aspects of each strategy. All endoscopic procedures require expertise which is achieved through adequate training and the availability of appropriate equipment.

Keywords

Endoscopic resection Endoscopic submucosal dissection Colorectal cancer 

Notes

Acknowledgement

Funding: This paper partially funded by The National Cancer Center Research and Development Fund (25-A-12, 28-K-1 and 29-A-13) and the JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number 18K07925.

References

  1. 1.
    Tsuneoka K, Uchida T. Fibergastroscopic polypectomy with snare method and its significance developed in our department:-polyp resection and recovery instruments. Gastroenterol Endosc. 1969;11(2):174–84.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kudo S. Endoscopic mucosal resection of flat and depressed types of early colorectal cancer. Endoscopy. 1993;25(7):455–61.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kitajima K, et al. Correlations between lymph node metastasis and depth of submucosal invasion in submucosal invasive colorectal carcinoma: a Japanese Collaborative Study. J Gastroenterol. 2004;39(6):534–43.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tajiri H, Niwa H. Proposal for a consensus terminology in endoscopy: how should different endoscopic imaging techniques be grouped and defined? Endoscopy. 2008;40(9):775–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kudo S, et al. Colorectal tumours and pit pattern. J Clin Pathol. 1994;47(10):880–5.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fu KI, et al. Chromoendoscopy using indigo carmine dye spraying with magnifying observation is the most reliable method for differential diagnosis between non-neoplastic and neoplastic colorectal lesions: a prospective study. Endoscopy. 2004;36(12):1089–93.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Matsuda T, et al. Efficacy of the invasive/non-invasive pattern by magnifying chromoendoscopy to estimate the depth of invasion of early colorectal neoplasms. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008;103(11):2700–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sakamoto T, et al. Comparison of the diagnostic performance between magnifying chromoendoscopy and magnifying narrow-band imaging for superficial colorectal neoplasms: an online survey. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018;87(5):1318–23.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kudo S, et al. Diagnosis of colorectal tumorous lesions by magnifying endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 1996;44(1):8–14.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hewett DG, et al. Validation of a simple classification system for endoscopic diagnosis of small colorectal polyps using narrow-band imaging. Gastroenterology. 2012;143(3):599–607 e1.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sano Y, et al. Narrow-band imaging (NBI) magnifying endoscopic classification of colorectal tumors proposed by the Japan NBI Expert Team. Dig Endosc. 2016;28(5):526–33.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sano Y, et al. Meshed capillary vessels by use of narrow-band imaging for differential diagnosis of small colorectal polyps. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;69(2):278–83.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ikematsu H, et al. Efficacy of capillary pattern type IIIA/IIIB by magnifying narrow band imaging for estimating depth of invasion of early colorectal neoplasms. BMC Gastroenterol. 2010;10:33.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    McGill SK, et al. Narrow band imaging to differentiate neoplastic and non-neoplastic colorectal polyps in real time: a meta-analysis of diagnostic operating characteristics. Gut. 2013;62(12):1704–13.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kuiper T, et al. Accuracy for optical diagnosis of small colorectal polyps in nonacademic settings. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;10(9):1016–20; quiz e79.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ladabaum U, et al. Real-time optical biopsy of colon polyps with narrow band imaging in community practice does not yet meet key thresholds for clinical decisions. Gastroenterology. 2013;144(1):81–91.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Repici A, et al. Safety of cold polypectomy for <10mm polyps at colonoscopy: a prospective multicenter study. Endoscopy. 2012;44(1):27–31.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rex DK, et al. The American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy PIVI (Preservation and Incorporation of Valuable Endoscopic Innovations) on real-time endoscopic assessment of the histology of diminutive colorectal polyps. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;73(3):419–22.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yamada M, et al. Endoscopic predictors of deep submucosal invasion in colorectal laterally spreading tumors. Endoscopy. 2016;48(5):456–64.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Nakajima T, et al. Current status of endoscopic resection strategy for large, early colorectal neoplasia in Japan. Surg Endosc. 2013;27(9):3262–70.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Oka S, et al. Local recurrence after endoscopic resection for large colorectal neoplasia: a multicenter prospective study in Japan. Am J Gastroenterol. 2015;110(5):697–707.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Yamada M, et al. Long-term clinical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal neoplasms in 423 cases: a retrospective study. Endoscopy. 2017;49(3):233–42.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Shigita K, et al. Long-term outcomes after endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial colorectal tumors. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;85(3):546–53.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Fuccio L, et al. Clinical outcomes after endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal neoplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;86(1):74–86 e17.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Saito Y, Bhatt A, Matsuda T. Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection and its journey to the West. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;86(1):90–2.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Rajan E, Wong Kee Song LM. Endoscopic full thickness resection. Gastroenterology. 2018;154(7):1925–37.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hiki N, et al. Laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery for gastrointestinal stromal tumor dissection. Surg Endosc. 2008;22(7):1729–35.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hiki N, et al. Laparoscopic endoscopic cooperative surgery. Dig Endosc. 2015;27(2):197–204.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hayashi N, et al. Predictors of incomplete resection and perforation associated with endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumors. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014;79(3):427–35.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Takeuchi Y, et al. Factors associated with technical difficulties and adverse events of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: retrospective exploratory factor analysis of a multicenter prospective cohort. Int J Color Dis. 2014;29(10):1275–84.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Hori K, et al. Predictive factors for technically difficult endoscopic submucosal dissection in the colorectum. Endoscopy. 2014;46(10):862–70.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Sato K, et al. Factors affecting the technical difficulty and clinical outcome of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumors. Surg Endosc. 2014;28(10):2959–65.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kim ES, et al. Factors predictive of perforation during endoscopic submucosal dissection for the treatment of colorectal tumors. Endoscopy. 2011;43(7):573–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Puli SR, et al. Meta-analysis and systematic review of colorectal endoscopic mucosal resection. World J Gastroenterol. 2009;15(34):4273–7.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Buchner AM, Guarner-Argente C, Ginsberg GG. Outcomes of EMR of defiant colorectal lesions directed to an endoscopy referral center. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;76(2):255–63.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Moss A, et al. Long-term adenoma recurrence following wide-field endoscopic mucosal resection (WF-EMR) for advanced colonic mucosal neoplasia is infrequent: results and risk factors in 1000 cases from the Australian Colonic EMR (ACE) study. Gut. 2015;64(1):57–65.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Sakamoto T, et al. Predictive factors of local recurrence after endoscopic piecemeal mucosal resection. J Gastroenterol. 2012;47(6):635–40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Moss A, et al. Endoscopic mucosal resection outcomes and prediction of submucosal cancer from advanced colonic mucosal neoplasia. Gastroenterology. 2011;140(7):1909–18.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Zhang HP, et al. The efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection compared with endoscopic mucosal resection for colorectal tumors: a meta-analysis. Int J Color Dis. 2016;31(3):791–3.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Makazu M, et al. Relationship between indeterminate or positive lateral margin and local recurrence after endoscopic resection of colorectal polyps. Endosc Int Open. 2015;3(3):E252–7.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Shigita K, et al. Clinical significance and validity of the subclassification for colorectal laterally spreading tumor granular type. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;31(5):973–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Saito Y, et al. A prospective, multicenter study of 1111 colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissections (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;72(6):1217–25.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Rey JF, Marek TA. Endo-loop in the prevention of the post-polypectomy bleeding: preliminary results. Gastrointest Endosc. 1997;46(4):387–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Kouklakis G, et al. Endoscopic resection of large pedunculated colonic polyps and risk of postpolypectomy bleeding with adrenaline injection versus endoloop and hemoclip: a prospective, randomized study. Surg Endosc. 2009;23(12):2732–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Lee EJ, et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumors—1,000 colorectal ESD cases: one specialized institute’s experiences. Surg Endosc. 2013;27(1):31–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Iacopini F, et al. Stepwise training in rectal and colonic endoscopic submucosal dissection with differentiated learning curves. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;76(6):1188–96.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Repici A, et al. Efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal neoplasia: a systematic review. Endoscopy. 2012;44(2):137–50.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Fujiya M, et al. Efficacy and adverse events of EMR and endoscopic submucosal dissection for the treatment of colon neoplasms: a meta-analysis of studies comparing EMR and endoscopic submucosal dissection. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81(3):583–95.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Arezzo A, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of endoscopic submucosal dissection vs endoscopic mucosal resection for colorectal lesions. United European Gastroenterol J. 2016;4(1):18–29.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Cao Y, et al. Meta-analysis of endoscopic submucosal dissection versus endoscopic mucosal resection for tumors of the gastrointestinal tract. Endoscopy. 2009;41(9):751–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Takamaru H, et al. Clinical impact of endoscopic clip closure of perforations during endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumors. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016;84(3):494–502 e1.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Ritsuno H, et al. Prospective clinical trial of traction device-assisted endoscopic submucosal dissection of large superficial colorectal tumors using the S-O clip. Surg Endosc. 2014;28(11):3143–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Perez-Cuadrado Robles E. M. Yamada, and Y. Saito, Successful balloon overtube-guided colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection by a gastroscope. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2016;108(5):280–1.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Masayoshi Yamada
    • 1
  • Yutaka Saito
    • 1
    Email author
  • Stefano Sansone
    • 2
  • Hiroyuki Takamaru
    • 1
  • Taku Sakamoto
    • 1
  1. 1.Endoscopy DivisionNational Cancer Center HospitalTokyoJapan
  2. 2.NIHR Nottingham Digestive Diseases Biomedical Research UnitNottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust and University of NottinghamNottinghamUK

Personalised recommendations