Multiview Clustering

  • Shiliang SunEmail author
  • Liang Mao
  • Ziang Dong
  • Lidan Wu


This chapter introduces three kinds of multiview clustering methods. We begin with the multiview spectral clustering, where the clustering is carried out through the partition of a relationship graph of the data. It depends on the eigenvector of the adjacent matrix of the data. Then we consider the multiview subspace clustering, which aims at recovering the underlying subspace of the multiview data and performs clustering on it. Finally, we introduce distributed multiview clustering, which first learns the patterns from each view individually and then combines them together to learn optimal patterns for clustering, and multiview clustering ensemble. It combines the results of multiple clustering algorithms to obtain better performance. We also briefly introduce some other methods at the end of this chapter.


  1. Achlioptas D, McSherry F (2005) On spectral learning of mixtures of distributions. In: Proceedings of the 18th annual conference on learning theory. ACM, Berlin, pp 458–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bolte J, Sabach S, Teboulle M (2014) Proximal alternating linearized minimization or nonconvex and nonsmooth problems. Math Program 146(1–2):459–494MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cai X, Nie F, Huang H (2013) Multi-view k-means clustering on big dataGoogle Scholar
  4. Chaudhuri K, Kakade SM, Livescu K, Sridharan K (2009) Multi-view clustering via canonical correlation analysis. In: Proceedings of the 26th annual international conference on machine learning. ACM, pp 129–136Google Scholar
  5. Ding C, He X, Simon HD (2005) On the equivalence of nonnegative matrix factorization and spectral clustering. In: Proceedings of the 5th SIAM international conference on data mining, SIAM, pp 606–610Google Scholar
  6. Elhamifar E, Vidal R (2013) Sparse subspace clustering: algorithm, theory, and applications. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 35(11):2765–2781CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gao H, Nie F, Li X, Huang H (2015) Multi-view subspace clustering. In: 2015 IEEE international conference on computer vision, pp 4238–4246Google Scholar
  8. Kumar A, Daum H (2011) A co-training approach for multi-view spectral clustering. In: Proceedings of the 28th international conference on machine learning. ACM, pp 393–400Google Scholar
  9. Kumar A, Rai P, Daume H (2011) Co-regularized multi-view spectral clustering. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst 24:1413–1421Google Scholar
  10. Lee DD, Seung HS (1999) Learning the parts of objects by non-negative matrix factorization. Nature 401(6755):788CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Liu J, Wang C, Gao J, Han J (2013) Multi-view clustering via joint nonnegative matrix factorization. In: Proceedings of the 13th SIAM international conference on data mining, SIAM, pp 252–260Google Scholar
  12. Long B, Yu PS, Zhang ZM (2008) A general model for multiple view unsupervised learning. In: Proceedings of the 8th SIAM international conference on data mining, SIAM, pp 822–833Google Scholar
  13. Nie F, Zeng Z, Tsang IW, Xu D, Zhang C (2011) Spectral embedded clustering: a framework for in-sample and out-of-sample spectral clustering. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 22(11):1796–1808CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Salakhutdinov R, Roweis ST (2003) Adaptive overrelaxed bound optimization methods. In: Proceedings of the 20th international conference on machine learning, pp 664–671Google Scholar
  15. Sun J, Lu J, Xu T, Bi J (2015) Multi-view sparse co-clustering via proximal alternating linearized minimization. In: Proceedings of the 32th international conference on machine learning, pp 757–766Google Scholar
  16. Topchy A, Jain AK, Punch W (2005) Clustering ensembles: models of consensus and weak partitions. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 27(12):1866–1881CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Von Luxburg U (2007) A tutorial on spectral clustering. Stat Comput 17(4):395–416MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Wang H, Nie F, Huang H, Risacher SL, Saykin AJ, Shen L, Initiative ADN (2012) Identifying disease sensitive and quantitative trait-relevant biomarkers from multidimensional heterogeneous imaging genetics data via sparse multimodal multitask learning. Bioinformatics 28(12):i127–i136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Wang H, Nie F, Huang H (2013a) Multi-view clustering and feature learning via structured sparsity. In: Proceedings of the 30th international conference on machine learning, pp 352–360Google Scholar
  20. Wang H, Nie F, Huang H, Ding C (2013b) Heterogeneous visual features fusion via sparse multimodal machine. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp 3097–3102Google Scholar
  21. Xie X, Sun S (2013) Multi-view clustering ensembles. In: Proceedings of the 5th international conference on machine learning and cybernetics, vol 1, pp 51–56Google Scholar
  22. Zhou ZH, Tang W (2006) Clusterer ensemble. Knowl-Based Syst 19(1):77–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computer Science and TechnologyEast China Normal UniversityShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations